How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An end is the equalizer of two products, and a coend the coequalizer of two coproducts
Statement
Let be a small category (Small, locally small, and large categories) and let be a functor. Suppose the two products
exist in (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations), and write for the two morphisms between them determined by and for , where and are the projections of the first and second product.
Then an end is the equalizer of two products (Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair, The end and the coend of a functor ): has an end exactly when have an equalizer, and then
Dually, if the coproducts and exist, a coend is the coequalizer of two maps between coproducts: the two morphisms determined on the -summand by and have a coequalizer exactly when has a coend, and then the coend is that coequalizer. Note that the -summand of the second coproduct is , with the domain and codomain of interchanged.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A small category , a functor on , and the displayed products and coproducts wherever they are assumed to exist.
A wedge from to is a dinatural transformation from a constant functor to : a family with for every ; a cowedge from to is a family with ; a morphism of wedges is a morphism of the vertices commuting with every component (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
A product of is an object with projections such that every family has a unique pairing , and dually a coproduct has injections with unique copairings (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations).
A category is small when both and are sets. (Small, locally small, and large categories).
An equalizer of is a morphism satisfying such that, whenever satisfies , there is a unique with ; a coequalizer is the dual (Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair).
A limit of is a terminal cone: explicitly, for every cone there exists a unique morphism such that for every (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).
An end of is a terminal object of the category of wedges over and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under ; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge (The end and the coend of a functor ).
Proof
Because is small, and are sets, so the two displayed families are set-indexed and the products named in the hypothesis are products of set-indexed families; no product over a proper class is formed anywhere below. The morphisms and exist and are unique because a morphism into a product is determined by its components.
For an object , the pairing of [F2] is a bijection between morphisms and families , given by . Under it, holds exactly when for every , that is exactly when for every , which is the wedge equation. So the equalising morphisms correspond exactly to the wedges with vertex , in both directions.
The correspondence of step 2.1 is compatible with precomposition: for the family attached to is . So a morphism of wedges is exactly a morphism with , and a terminal wedge is exactly a universal equalising morphism. By [F3] and [F4] that says has an end exactly when have an equalizer, and then the end is the equalizer, with ; the same statement read through [F6] identifies both with the limit of the parallel pair.
Dually, the copairing of [F2] is a bijection between morphisms and families , and holds exactly when for every , which is the cowedge equation; the same compatibility with postcomposition then makes an initial cowedge exactly a coequalizer of . The indexing is written out rather than left to duality because the -summand of the second coproduct is and not .
Remarks
The two index sets are the objects and the morphisms of , and they are not the objects and morphisms of ; this formula is therefore not an instance of the general construction of a limit from products and equalizers applied to An end is a limit over the twisted arrow category, and a coend is a colimit over its opposite, and it is proved here from the wedge universal property directly.
The identity morphisms of contribute components to the second product, and they cost nothing: at the equalising condition of step 2.1 reads . Restricting the second product to the non-identity morphisms would give the same equalizer, but the unrestricted indexing is what makes the two morphisms and definable by a single formula.
Depends on
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form
- Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations
- Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair
- Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties
- Small, locally small, and large categories
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. M. Kelly, Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory (TAC Reprints 10), (2.2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Remark 1.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)