Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every functor on Cop×C has an end

Statement

False claim: every functor T:Cop×C→D has an end (The end and the coend of a functor Cop×C→D).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The discrete category C on the set N of natural numbers, the full subcategory D of Set whose objects are the finite sets, and the functor T with T(c,c′)={0,1} for every pair of objects.

[F4]

Sets as objects and functions as morphisms form a large locally small category Set (Sets and functions form the large locally small category Set).

[F3]

A subcategory has a subclass of the objects and, for each pair, a subclass of the morphisms; The subcategory is full when A(A,B)=C(A,B) for every pair of its objects (Subcategory and full subcategory).

[F6]

A category is small when both Ob⁡(C) and Mor⁡(C) are sets. (Small, locally small, and large categories).

[F8]

A wedge from d to T is a family ωc:d→T(c,c) with T(1c,f)∘ωc=T(f,1c′)∘ωc′ for every f:c→c′ (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).

[F1]

An end of T is a terminal object of the category of wedges over T and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under T; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge, so an end is a wedge through which every wedge factors by exactly one morphism (The end and the coend of a functor Cop×C→D).

[L1]

For small C and a target where the displayed objects exist, an end is the equalizer of two products, the first indexed by the objects of C and the second by its morphisms (An end is the equalizer of two products, and a coend the coequalizer of two coproducts).

[F2]

A product of (Ai)i∈I is an object P with projections pi such that every family fi:X→Ai has a unique pairing ⟨fi⟩i∈I:X→P,pi⟨fi⟩=fi(i∈I) (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations).

[F5]

A set A is finite when A≈n for some n∈N, and then ∣A∣ is that unique n (The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set).

[L2]

For every n∈N there is no injection σ(n)→n (The pigeonhole principle on N).

[F7]

A category is complete when it has all small limits; Completeness and cocompleteness do not assert the existence of limits or colimits of large diagrams (Finite, small, and large limits and colimits; complete and cocomplete categories).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1F3F4F6givenconstruct

Let C be discrete on N, so its only morphisms are identities and it is small by [F6]; let D be the full subcategory of Set on the finite sets, which is a category by [F3] and [F4]; and let T send every pair of objects to the two-element set {0,1} and every morphism to an identity, which is a functor because every morphism of Cop×C is an identity. The index category is deliberately small, so that smallness of the index is not what is at issue.

2.1F2F8L1step 1.1

A wedge over T with vertex X is an unconstrained family: by [F8] the wedge equation is imposed only at morphisms of C, and all of those are identities, at which it reads ωc=ωc. So a wedge with vertex X is exactly a family of functions X→{0,1} indexed by N, and by [L1] and [F2] an end of T is exactly a product of the diagonal values in D.

3.1F1F2F5L2step 2.1

No object of D has that property. Suppose E were an end, with ∣E∣=n by [F5]. Take the vertex to be a one-element set, which is an object of D; the wedges with that vertex are the families (ϵc)c∈N with ϵc∈{0,1}, and the σ(n) families that are 1 at exactly one of the numbers 0,…,n and 0 elsewhere are pairwise distinct. By [F1] each factors through E by exactly one morphism from a one-element set, that is by exactly one element of E, and distinct wedges give distinct elements; this is an injection σ(n)→E, hence an injection σ(n)→n, which [L2] forbids. So T has no end and the claim is false.

4.1F7step 3.1∎

A large index category is a second and independent way for an end to fail, since the equalizer description of [L1] would then ask for a product over a proper class, and [F7] records that completeness asserts nothing about diagrams that are not small. The refutation above does not use that route: its index category is small, and what fails is the target.

Remarks

The witness turns on the target, not on the index. Taking D to be all of Set would make the end exist, since the required product is then available; taking the diagonal values to be one-element sets would also make it exist, since the product of one-element sets is a one-element set. It is the combination of infinitely many two-element values with a target closed under nothing infinite that removes the end.

The correct sufficient condition is on this page: Ends exist over a small index category in a complete target, and coends in a cocomplete one asks for a small index category and a complete target, and the witness above has the first without the second.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources