How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products in Set are Cartesian products and coproducts are tagged disjoint unions
Example
For a set-indexed family in , the categorical product is the Cartesian product , and the categorical coproduct is the tagged disjoint union .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set-indexed family .
A product represents families , and a coproduct represents families (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations).
Morphisms of are functions (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Verification
Coordinate evaluation gives functions . Given , define . Then , and these equations determine every value of , proving existence and uniqueness in [F1].
If , the product consists of the single empty function, so there is exactly one function from every to it. Thus the same verification covers the nullary product.
Let the th injection send to . Given , define . This is the unique function whose composite with the th injection is for all , so [F1] proves the coproduct property. For , the tagged union is empty and has exactly one function to every set.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Examples 3.1.10 and 3.1.14 (standard reference, not scraped)