How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Direct sums of projectives are projective, and module categories have enough projectives
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. An arbitrary direct sum of projective left -modules is projective, and every left -module is the quotient in a short exact sequence with projective. Thus the category of left -modules has enough projectives.
For a finite direct sum, finite choice suffices; the empty direct sum is the zero module and is projective. The arbitrary free cover uses the full choice boundary recorded for free modules.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A family of projective left -modules and a left -module .
A family of component maps determines a unique map from the direct sum (Universal property of a direct sum of modules).
Under AC every free module is projective; a finite basis needs only finite choice (Free modules are projective, with the exact choice boundary).
The canonical map is surjective (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
AC chooses one element from each member of an arbitrary family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
A listed finite family of nonempty sets has a choice function in ZF (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values).
Proof
Given a surjection and a homomorphism , each component has a nonempty set of lifts because is projective.
By [L3], is a canonical surjection. Under AC, [L2] makes projective, so with one obtains the asserted short exact sequence.
Use [F1] to choose a lift for every ; for finite , [L4] suffices, and for the family is empty.
By [L1], the assemble uniquely into , and equality on every summand gives . Thus the direct sum is projective.
Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 prove closure under arbitrary direct sums with the stated choice cost, and step 1.2 gives enough projectives.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 30 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)