How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The graded horseshoe lemma for finite graded projective resolutions
Statement
Fix and let be the abelian category of finite generated graded left -modules and degree-zero maps of Finite graded A_m-modules, internal shifts and the vertex projectives. Let be degreewise exact in , so that is injective, is surjective and degreewise, and suppose that admits a finite graded projective resolution of length at most and one of length at most , in the sense that the resolutions consist of finitely generated graded projective modules with for and for . Then admits a finite graded projective resolution of length at most , that is, there is an exact sequence of finitely generated graded projectives with for .
In particular, writing for the least such length (so that exactly when is finite graded projective, and the zero module has ), every degreewise extension of two objects of finite projective dimension has finite projective dimension with . The argument is a horseshoe construction carried out on elements of graded modules and selects only finitely many lifts; it uses no choice principle and no arbitrary-abelian-category element chase.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the abelian category over the algebra , and a degreewise short exact sequence in it.
is the abelian category of finitely generated graded left -modules and degree-zero maps; kernels, cokernels and finite biproducts are computed degreewise and a sequence is exact precisely when it is exact degreewise; each vertex projective is a finite graded projective left -module (Finite graded A_m-modules, internal shifts and the vertex projectives).
is free of rank as a graded abelian group with basis the displayed vertex, arrow and return classes, so its underlying -module is free of finite rank (The 4m+1 path basis).
Every principal ideal domain is Noetherian; is a principal ideal domain (Every principal ideal domain is Noetherian).
Every finitely generated left module over a left Noetherian ring is Noetherian (Finitely generated modules over a left Noetherian ring are Noetherian).
A unital ring is left Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian, and unqualified "Noetherian ring" means left Noetherian (Left and right Noetherian rings).
A left -module is Noetherian when every submodule of is finitely generated (Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated).
A graded left -module is graded projective when every degree-zero epimorphism and every degree-zero admit a degree-zero lift with , and is finite graded projective when in addition it is generated by finitely many homogeneous elements; the zero module is finite graded projective (Finite graded projective modules).
A graded left -module is finite graded projective if and only if it is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum of internal shifts (Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands).
A projective resolution of an object of an abelian category is an augmented chain complex with every projective that is exact at every displayed term (Projective resolutions in an abelian category).
For an -linear degree-zero map of graded left -modules, the kernel and the image are graded submodules of and and are computed degreewise; a map is a monomorphism exactly when it is injective and an epimorphism exactly when it is surjective (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).
Proof
is left Noetherian. By [L2] the underlying -module of is free of finite rank, hence finitely generated, and is Noetherian by [F3]; so is a Noetherian -module by [L4], which by [L6] means that every -submodule of is finitely generated as a -module. A left ideal of is a -submodule, so every left ideal is finitely generated as a -module and hence as a left ideal; since the submodules of the left regular module are exactly the left ideals, the regular module is Noetherian and [F5] makes left Noetherian.
The lift and the comparison map . For the augmentation of [F9] and the epimorphism , the module is finite graded projective and is a degree-zero epimorphism, so the lifting property of [F7] produces a degree-zero with . Let be the degree-zero map ; both summands lie in , and is -linear because , and are.
Projectivity of the prepended term. The direct sum is a finite graded projective left -module: by [L8] the modules and are degree-zero direct summands of finite direct sums of shifts of , and the direct sum of two such summands, with the summand inclusions and projections added componentwise, is a degree-zero direct summand of the direct sum of the two finite direct sums of shifts, which is again a finite direct sum of shifts of ; so [L8] applies to .
The horseshoe recursion. We prove by induction on the statement : for every degreewise short exact sequence in and all integers with such that has a finite graded projective resolution of length at most and one of length at most , the module has a finite graded projective resolution of length at most .
Submodules of finitely generated graded modules are finitely generated. Let be a finitely generated graded left -module and a submodule. Then is a finitely generated left module over the left Noetherian ring of step 1.1, so [L4] makes Noetherian, and by [L6] the submodule is finitely generated over . Applied to a graded submodule, this gives a finite -generating family of , which by the homogeneous-component rewriting recorded in [F7] may be taken homogeneous; in particular the kernel of any degree-zero map of finitely generated graded left -modules is again an object of .
is an epimorphism. Let . Since is surjective by [F9], there is with ; then , so for some , and surjectivity of gives with . Thus , so is surjective and hence an epimorphism by [F10].
The kernel stays finitely generated. Let . The module is finite graded projective, in particular finitely generated, and so is ; hence is finitely generated as a graded left -module, and by step 2.1 the submodule is finitely generated, so is an object of .
The syzygy sequence is degreewise short exact. Put and . The projection , , lands in : if , then . The inclusion , , has image exactly , since means , equivalently because is injective. The map is surjective: given , one has , so for some ; choose with , possible because is surjective. Then , and maps to . These are degree-zero module maps, and [L1] makes degreewise exact in ; are finite graded modules by step 3.1 and step 2.1.
Base case . Here , so the resolutions and are exact, so and are isomorphisms and . By step 4.1 the sequence is degreewise exact, so ; by steps 1.2 and 2.2 the map is an epimorphism with zero kernel, hence an isomorphism by [F10], and is finite graded projective by step 1.3. So is a finite graded projective resolution of of length , and holds.
Inductive step. Assume and , and let with be given. If , the base-case argument already proves the claim. Suppose . If , set ; if , set . Then in both cases, because gives and gives as . Define from in the same way, so as well. First syzygies have resolutions of these lengths: if , the exactness of the resolution of [F9] at and the vanishing show that is a finite graded projective resolution of of length ; if , then and the zero complex is a finite graded projective resolution of of length , the zero module being finite graded projective by [F7]; the same alternative holds for with . By step 4.1 the sequence is degreewise short exact in , so applies to it with the bounds and yields a finite graded projective resolution of of length at most . Prepending the epimorphism of step 1.2, with kernel the finitely generated module of step 3.1, produces with finite graded projective by step 1.3 and all higher terms those of the resolution of , so has a finite graded projective resolution of length at most , and holds.
Every step of the recursion is a single application of the lifting property of [F7] and finitely many element choices inside a fixed module, and the induction hypothesis is applied to finitely many sequences; no family indexed by an infinite set is selected. [step 1.2, step 2.2, step 3.1, step 4.1, step 1.3, F7, F9, F10]
Conclusion. Applying of step 1.4 with proves the first claim: a degreewise short exact sequence in whose outer terms carry finite graded projective resolutions of lengths at most and makes carry one of length at most ; taking and gives , and the construction never selects more than finitely many lifts, so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
- Finite graded A_m-modules, internal shifts and the vertex projectives
- Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category
- Projective resolutions in an abelian category
- Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands
- Finite graded projective modules
- The 4m+1 path basis
- Every principal ideal domain is Noetherian
- Finitely generated modules over a left Noetherian ring are Noetherian
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, ch. 2 §2.2, pp. 36-38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mikhail Khovanov and Paul Seidel, Quivers, Floer Cohomology, and Braid Group Actions, §2a, printed pp. 9-11 (standard reference, not scraped)