How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sections of a sheaf flat over the base are flat over affine opens
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the zero criterion cited below (The Axiom of Choice, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, local criteria for zero modules and for injective, surjective, and bijective maps). Let be a morphism of schemes and let be a quasi-coherent -module that is flat over , meaning that for every the stalk is a flat module over the local ring (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms). Let and be affine opens with . Then is a flat -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a morphism of schemes , a quasi-coherent -module with flat over for every , and affine opens , with .
Restrictions of quasi-coherent modules to open subschemes are quasi-coherent; on an affine scheme a quasi-coherent module is canonically the associated sheaf of its global sections, so with , and the stalk of at is . (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme, Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Module sheaf on an affine scheme, The stalk of an associated sheaf is the localisation)
The affine open inclusions correspond to a ring map under the anti-equivalence of affine schemes with rings, a point has image in , and . (The map of affine spectra induced by a ring homomorphism, The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p)
Flatness hypothesis: for every prime with , the stalk is a flat -module.
Flatness criterion: an -module is flat if and only if for every finitely generated ideal the multiplication map is injective; in particular if is flat then is injective for every ideal . (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms)
Localization is exact, localizes kernels and cokernels, and is computed by tensoring with the localized ring: for a multiplicative set there is a natural isomorphism ; tensor products of modules may be regrouped. (Localisation of modules is exact, Localisation of modules is extension of scalars, Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels, Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules)
A module is zero if and only if for every maximal ideal ; every maximal ideal is prime; and an element has zero image in if and only if for some . (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, local criteria for zero modules and for injective, surjective, and bijective maps, Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime, A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator)
The Axiom of Choice is assumed, and it is exactly what the zero criterion of the previous paragraph consumes. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Set . By [F1] the restriction is quasi-coherent and is isomorphic to , and for every prime the stalk of at is .
We prove that is flat over . Let be a finitely generated ideal and let be the kernel of the multiplication map , so that is a -submodule. Suppose . By the zero criterion of [F6] applied to the -module there is a maximal ideal with ; by [F6] the maximal ideal is prime, and we put .
Let be a prime and put . By [F2] the point lies in with and . Hypothesis [F3] therefore states that is a flat -module.
Localizing the exact sequence of -modules at , the module is the kernel of the localized multiplication map . By the localizations and regroupings of [F5], where is the extension of to , and under these isomorphisms the localized map is the multiplication map .
By step 2.1 applied to the prime the module is flat over , so by the ideal criterion [F4] the map is injective. By step 2.2 its kernel is , hence , contradicting the choice of in step 1.2. Therefore for every finitely generated ideal .
Since every finitely generated ideal gives an injective multiplication map , the criterion [F4] shows that is a flat -module.
Boundary and choice accounting. If then and , the zero module being flat over ; if then ; if then also , and if or there is no nonempty affine open to consider. By [F7] the Axiom of Choice is available exactly as the zero criterion [F6] consumes it, namely to supply the maximal ideal of step 1.2; the localizations used are those of [F1], [F2] and [F5], and no further selection is made. The assertion of the statement is exactly the flatness of over established in step 4.1, so the lemma is proved.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules
- Module sheaf on an affine scheme
- The stalk of an associated sheaf is the localisation
- The map of affine spectra induced by a ring homomorphism
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p
- Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms
- Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests
- Localisation of modules is exact
- Localisation of modules is extension of scalars
- Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules
- Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, local criteria for zero modules and for injective, surjective, and bijective maps
- A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator
- Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.26.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.39.18 (standard reference, not scraped)