How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Hilbert-polynomial, hyperplane, global-generation and base-change suppliers cited below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (Field) and let be projective over in the fixed-embedding convention of Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme: is a closed immersion for some (Closed immersions of schemes, Relative projective space from standard charts, so is projective in the H-projective convention Projective morphisms before Proj), and (Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf).
Let be a coherent -module (Coherent module sheaves) with Hilbert polynomial characterized by for every (Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). Then where the degree of the zero polynomial is and the dimension of the empty set is (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Support of a module sheaf): for this says that has exact degree with nonzero leading coefficient, and for both sides are .
The empty scheme (forcing ), the zero sheaf, the case , finite and infinite base fields , and of dimension zero are included. No positivity of and no effectivity are asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice as inherited, a field , a closed immersion , the invertible sheaf with its twists, and a coherent -module .
The Hilbert polynomial: for every coherent on there is a unique with for every ; there is with for all ; and when . (Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections)
Support and dimension: for a coherent on the support is closed in (Support of a module sheaf), and is a Noetherian topological space whose closed subsets have a well-defined chain dimension with , so has a nonnegative dimension when . The charts of are spectra of the Noetherian rings (Relative projective space from standard charts, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every , Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets, Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention)
Additivity of in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper -scheme (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences, Exact sequences of sheaves).
The hyperplane lemma: if is infinite and is coherent with , there is a linear form such that for every the map is injective with coherent cokernel satisfying ; if then for every , and if then for every . (Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction)
Exactness and the fixed cokernel: tensoring by the invertible sheaf is exact, twists of coherent modules are coherent, and for the sheaves of [F4] the twist of the exact sequence by is canonically , so that and by [F3]. (Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks, Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf)
Positive sections at large twists: let be any field and coherent on . The pushforward is a nonzero coherent module on the locally Noetherian , and is ample on because the identity is a closed immersion over the affine base pulling back to itself. Hence Eventual generation of coherent projective twists gives with globally generated (Global generation by the evaluation map) for every ; such a nonzero globally generated module has a nonzero global section, because it is the image of a direct sum of copies of indexed by its global sections and hence is zero if all of them vanish. Finally for every , using the projection identity of a closed immersion (checked on affine charts) and the invariance of cohomology under . Consequently there exist arbitrarily large with . (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Relative projective space from standard charts, Coherent module sheaves, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections)
Base change to an infinite field: for a field extension with base change and , one has for every coherent (Support dimension under field extension) and for every coherent (Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology); moreover pullback of quasi-coherent modules is monoidal and , so for every , exactly as in the base-change step of Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial (where the compatibility of the twisting sheaf with base change and the monoidality of pullback are likewise recorded as proof obligations). The rational function field is an infinite field extension of (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular , The field of fractions of an integral domain, Scheme pullback preserves quasi-coherence, Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules, Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces)
Finite differences of polynomials: for of degree with leading coefficient and with for all , the polynomial has degree with leading coefficient ; if has degree then has degree and leading coefficient times the leading coefficient of , while if is constant then . Consequently a polynomial identity with of exact degree forces . [algebra]
The Axiom of Choice is the choice principle named in the statement, inherited from the suppliers cited in [F1], [F4], [F6] and [F7]. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Setup and the zero sheaf. By [F1] the polynomial exists and is unique for every coherent , and by [F2] the dimension of is defined, with . If then and , so both sides of are by the conventions of the statement. Assume henceforth that and, until 1.5, that is infinite.
The induction claim. For let be: every nonzero coherent on with satisfies . We prove for all by induction; the required dimensions are finite for the following additional reason. Each support intersects a standard projective chart in a closed subset of . By A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point, its irreducible closed chains correspond to prime chains in that polynomial ring, whose lengths are at most by A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n. By Dimension can be computed on an open cover, dimension of the support is the maximum of these chart dimensions, hence lies in for nonzero modules. This is the finite-dimensionality needed for induction, beyond Noetherianity in [F2].
Base case . Let be coherent with . By [F4] there is with cokernel for every ; then is an isomorphism for every , so [F5] and [F3] give for every , and is constant by [F8]. By [F6] choose with and, using [F1], enlarge if necessary so that also ; then is the nonzero constant , so .
Induction step . Let be coherent with . Apply [F4] to obtain , and put , the cokernel of ; by [F4] the module is coherent, and , so and the induction hypothesis gives , in particular is nonzero of exact degree . By [F5] and [F3], for every , By [F8] applied to this identity with of exact degree , the polynomial has degree ; hence holds.
Conclusion for infinite . By 1.2-1.4 every nonzero coherent on satisfies , and with 1.1 the identity also holds for in the extended conventions. This proves the theorem when is infinite.
Arbitrary base field. Let be arbitrary and let , an infinite field extension of by [F7]; put with projection and . By [F7] the module is the pullback of a coherent module and , so and steps 1.1-1.5 applied to the projective pair with the coherent module give . For every , [F7] applied to the coherent module gives , so as polynomials; hence .
Boundaries and choice. The empty scheme forces and is covered by 1.1 with both sides ; the zero sheaf is the case ; the case has either empty or , and all steps apply with the single chart. The base case includes nonzero sheaves of finite nonempty support, and the induction step covers every ; the finite base field is reduced to the infinite field in 1.6, and no positivity of beyond nonzero is used. The Axiom of Choice is consumed exactly through the Hilbert polynomial theorem and its suppliers [F1], the hyperplane lemma [F4], the global-generation route to a positive [F6] and the base-change comparison [F7]; the field is constructed, not selected.
Depends on
- A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n
- Dimension can be computed on an open cover
- A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point
- If $R$ is Noetherian then $R[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ is Noetherian for every $n\in\mathbb N$
- Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat
- For a field $F$, $F(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(F[t])$ is its rational function field; in particular $\mathbb R(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(\mathbb R[t])$
- Absolute ampleness by affine section opens
- The Axiom of Choice
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Coherent module sheaves
- Chain dimension and the empty-space convention
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- Field
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Global generation by the evaluation map
- Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme
- Invertible sheaves
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets
- Projective morphisms before Proj
- Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Support of a module sheaf
- Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf
- Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change
- Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward
- Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences
- Eventual generation of coherent projective twists
- A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian
- Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets
- Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology
- Scheme pullback preserves quasi-coherence
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction
- The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks
- Support dimension under field extension
- Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness
- Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules
- A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk
- Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
226 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)