Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Hilbert-polynomial, hyperplane, global-generation and base-change suppliers cited below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field) and let X be projective over k in the fixed-embedding convention of Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme: i:X↪Pkn is a closed immersion for some n≥0 (Closed immersions of schemes, Relative projective space from standard charts, so X is projective in the H-projective convention Projective morphisms before Proj), OX(1)=i∗OPkn(1) and G(m)=G⊗OXOX(1)⊗m (Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf).

Let F be a coherent OX-module (Coherent module sheaves) with Hilbert polynomial PF∈Q[t] characterized by PF(m)=χ(X,F(m)) for every m∈Z (Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). Then deg⁡PF=dim⁡Supp⁡F, where the degree of the zero polynomial is −∞ and the dimension of the empty set is −∞ (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Support of a module sheaf): for F≠0 this says that P has exact degree dim⁡Supp⁡F with nonzero leading coefficient, and for F=0 both sides are −∞.

The empty scheme X=∅ (forcing F=0), the zero sheaf, the case n=0, finite and infinite base fields k, and X of dimension zero are included. No positivity of F and no effectivity are asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice as inherited, a field k, a closed immersion i:X↪Pkn, the invertible sheaf OX(1)=i∗O(1) with its twists, and a coherent OX-module F.

[F1]

The Hilbert polynomial: for every coherent G on X there is a unique PG∈Q[t] with PG(m)=χ(X,G(m)) for every m∈Z; there is m0 with PG(m)=hG(m)=dim⁡kH0(X,G(m)) for all m≥m0; and PG=0 when G=0. (Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections)

[F2]

Support and dimension: for a coherent G on X the support Supp⁡G is closed in X (Support of a module sheaf), and X is a Noetherian topological space whose closed subsets have a well-defined chain dimension with dim⁡∅=−∞, so Supp⁡G has a nonnegative dimension when G≠0. The charts of Pkn are spectra of the Noetherian rings k[xℓ(i)] (Relative projective space from standard charts, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, If R is Noetherian then R[x1,…,xn] is Noetherian for every n∈N, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets, Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention)

[F3]

Additivity of χ in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper k-scheme X (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences, Exact sequences of sheaves).

[F4]

The hyperplane lemma: if k is infinite and G≠0 is coherent with d:=dim⁡Supp⁡G, there is a linear form ℓ such that for every m the map ⋅ℓ:G(m−1)→G(m) is injective with coherent cokernel G′(m) satisfying Supp⁡G′(m)=Supp⁡G∩V(ℓ); if d≥1 then dim⁡Supp⁡G′(m)=d−1 for every m, and if d=0 then G′(m)=0 for every m. (Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction)

[F5]

Exactness and the fixed cokernel: tensoring by the invertible sheaf OX(1) is exact, twists of coherent modules are coherent, and for the sheaves of [F4] the twist of the exact sequence 0→G(−1)→G→G′(0)→0 by OX(1)⊗m is canonically 0→G(m−1)→G(m)→G′(m)→0, so that G′(m)≅G′(0)⊗OX(1)⊗m and χ(X,G(m))−χ(X,G(m−1))=χ(X,G′(0)(m)) by [F3]. (Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks, Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf)

[F6]

Positive sections at large twists: let k be any field and G≠0 coherent on X. The pushforward i∗G is a nonzero coherent module on the locally Noetherian Pkn, and O(1) is ample on Pkn because the identity is a closed immersion over the affine base Spec⁡k pulling O(1) back to itself. Hence Eventual generation of coherent projective twists gives m1 with (i∗G)(m) globally generated (Global generation by the evaluation map) for every m≥m1; such a nonzero globally generated module has a nonzero global section, because it is the image of a direct sum of copies of O indexed by its global sections and hence is zero if all of them vanish. Finally H0(Pkn,(i∗G)(m))≅H0(Pkn,i∗(G(m)))≅H0(X,G(m)) for every m≥0, using the projection identity i∗(G⊗i∗H)≅(i∗G)⊗H of a closed immersion (checked on affine charts) and the invariance of cohomology under i∗. Consequently there exist arbitrarily large m with hG(m)>0. (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Relative projective space from standard charts, Coherent module sheaves, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections)

[F7]

Base change to an infinite field: for a field extension K/k with base change g:XK→X and GK=g∗G, one has dim⁡Supp⁡GK=dim⁡Supp⁡G for every coherent G (Support dimension under field extension) and χ(XK,HK)=χ(X,H) for every coherent H (Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology); moreover pullback of quasi-coherent modules is monoidal and g∗OX(1)≅OXK(1), so g∗(H(m))≅HK(m) for every m∈Z, exactly as in the base-change step of Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial (where the compatibility of the twisting sheaf with base change and the monoidality of pullback are likewise recorded as proof obligations). The rational function field K=k(t) is an infinite field extension of k (For a field F, F(t)=Frac⁡(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular R(t)=Frac⁡(R[t]), The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain, Scheme pullback preserves quasi-coherence, Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules, Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces)

[F8]

Finite differences of polynomials: for Q∈Q[t] of degree e≥0 with leading coefficient a≠0 and R∈Q[t] with R(m)−R(m−1)=Q(m) for all m, the polynomial R has degree e+1 with leading coefficient a/(e+1); if R≠0 has degree f≥1 then R(m)−R(m−1) has degree f−1 and leading coefficient f times the leading coefficient of R, while if R is constant then R(m)−R(m−1)=0. Consequently a polynomial identity R(m)−R(m−1)=Q(m) with Q of exact degree e≥0 forces deg⁡R=e+1. [algebra]

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice is the choice principle named in the statement, inherited from the suppliers cited in [F1], [F4], [F6] and [F7]. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct: after a base change to an infinite field, induct on the dimension of the support using the regular-hyperplane sequence, whose cokernel has support of dimension one less; the finite-difference operator turns the polynomial identity $P_{\mathcal G}(m)-P_{\mathcal G}(m-1)=P_{\mathcal G'}(m)$ into a degree computation, with the degree-zero case settled by exhibiting a positive value of the constant polynomial through global generation at a large twist
1.1F1F2

Setup and the zero sheaf. By [F1] the polynomial PF exists and is unique for every coherent F, and by [F2] the dimension of Supp⁡F is defined, with dim⁡∅=−∞. If F=0 then PF=0 and Supp⁡F=∅, so both sides of deg⁡PF=dim⁡Supp⁡F are −∞ by the conventions of the statement. Assume henceforth that F≠0 and, until 1.5, that k is infinite.

1.2F2algebra

The induction claim. For d≥0 let Ψ(d) be: every nonzero coherent G on X with dim⁡Supp⁡G=d satisfies deg⁡PG=d. We prove Ψ(d) for all d by induction; the required dimensions are finite for the following additional reason. Each support intersects a standard projective chart in a closed subset of Spec⁡k[t1,…,tn]. By A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point, its irreducible closed chains correspond to prime chains in that polynomial ring, whose lengths are at most n by A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n. By Dimension can be computed on an open cover, dimension of the support is the maximum of these chart dimensions, hence lies in {0,…,n} for nonzero modules. This is the finite-dimensionality needed for induction, beyond Noetherianity in [F2].

1.3F1F3F4F5F6F8

Base case d=0. Let G≠0 be coherent with dim⁡Supp⁡G=0. By [F4] there is ℓ with cokernel G′(m)=0 for every m; then G(m−1)→G(m) is an isomorphism for every m, so [F5] and [F3] give PG(m)−PG(m−1)=χ(X,G′(0)(m))=0 for every m, and PG is constant by [F8]. By [F6] choose m1 with hG(m1)>0 and, using [F1], enlarge m1 if necessary so that also PG(m1)=hG(m1); then PG is the nonzero constant hG(m1)>0, so deg⁡PG=0.

1.4F3F4F5F8

Induction step d≥1. Let G≠0 be coherent with d=dim⁡Supp⁡G≥1. Apply [F4] to obtain ℓ, and put G′=G′(0), the cokernel of ⋅ℓ:G(−1)→G(0); by [F4] the module G′ is coherent, Supp⁡G′=Supp⁡G∩V(ℓ) and dim⁡Supp⁡G′=d−1≥0, so G′≠0 and the induction hypothesis Ψ(d−1) gives deg⁡PG′=d−1, in particular PG′ is nonzero of exact degree d−1≥0. By [F5] and [F3], for every m, PG(m)−PG(m−1)=χ(X,G(m))−χ(X,G(m−1))=χ(X,G′(0)(m))=PG′(m). By [F8] applied to this identity with Q=PG′ of exact degree d−1, the polynomial PG has degree (d−1)+1=d; hence Ψ(d) holds.

1.51.11.21.31.4

Conclusion for infinite k. By 1.2-1.4 every nonzero coherent G on X satisfies deg⁡PG=dim⁡Supp⁡G, and with 1.1 the identity also holds for G=0 in the extended conventions. This proves the theorem when k is infinite.

1.6F71.5

Arbitrary base field. Let k be arbitrary and let K=k(t), an infinite field extension of k by [F7]; put XK=X×Spec⁡kSpec⁡K with projection g and FK=g∗F. By [F7] the module FK is the pullback of a coherent module and dim⁡Supp⁡FK=dim⁡Supp⁡F≥0, so FK≠0 and steps 1.1-1.5 applied to the projective pair XK/K with the coherent module FK give deg⁡PFK=dim⁡Supp⁡FK. For every m∈Z, [F7] applied to the coherent module F(m) gives PFK(m)=χ(XK,FK(m))=χ(XK,(F(m))K)=χ(X,F(m))=PF(m), so PFK=PF as polynomials; hence deg⁡PF=deg⁡PFK=dim⁡Supp⁡FK=dim⁡Supp⁡F.

2.1F1F4F6F7F91.11.6∎

Boundaries and choice. The empty scheme X=∅ forces F=0 and is covered by 1.1 with both sides −∞; the zero sheaf is the case F=0; the case n=0 has X either empty or Spec⁡k, and all steps apply with the single chart. The base case d=0 includes nonzero sheaves of finite nonempty support, and the induction step covers every d≥1; the finite base field is reduced to the infinite field k(t) in 1.6, and no positivity of F beyond nonzero is used. The Axiom of Choice is consumed exactly through the Hilbert polynomial theorem and its suppliers [F1], the hyperplane lemma [F4], the global-generation route to a positive h0 [F6] and the base-change comparison [F7]; the field k(t) is constructed, not selected.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

226 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources