Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coherent module sheaves

Definition

Let X be a scheme and let F be a quasi-coherent OX-module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme) that is of finite type (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves). Then F is coherent if for every open U⊆X and every morphism OU n⟶F∣U,n≥0 finite, the kernel sheaf ker⁡φ is of finite type (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).

Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the associated-sheaf existence theorem at the sheaf-kernel identification below, the following affine test is equivalent to the definition. Since the conditions are local, it suffices to test affine opens U=Spec⁡A on which F∣U≅M~ for a finitely generated A-module M: then a morphism OUn→M~ is given by an A-linear map ψ:An→M (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves) and, as localisation is exact (Localisation of modules is exact), the kernel sheaf has ker⁡φ(D(f))=ker⁡(ψ)⊗AAf=ker⁡(ψ)f, so it is the associated sheaf of the finitely generated module ker⁡ψ precisely when that kernel is finitely generated (The associated module sheaf exists).

Finite presentation does not imply coherence under the same AC assumption. Over a general base the kernel condition is a genuine additional hypothesis. Let k be a field and let A=k[x,y1,y2,… ]/(xyi, yiyj : i,j≥1); the classes of 1,x,x2,…,y1,y2,… form a k-basis of A, so A=k[x]⊕⨁i≥1k[x]yi as a k[x]-module, and multiplication by x, viewed as an A-linear map ψ:A→A, has kernel ker⁡ψ=Ann⁡A(x)=⨁i≥1k[x]yi, which is not finitely generated as an A-module. The module A is finitely presented, even free of rank one, but the associated sheaf A~=OX on X=Spec⁡A receives the morphism OX→OX corresponding to ψ (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, The associated module sheaf exists) whose kernel is the associated sheaf of Ann⁡A(x) and is not of finite type. Hence OX is not coherent on this X; finite presentation, and even local freeness of finite rank, do not by themselves imply coherence over an arbitrary base. The identification of coherent with finite type is a theorem about locally Noetherian schemes, proved on this page; over a locally Noetherian scheme finite locally free sheaves are therefore coherent.

Immediate consequences. Coherence is local on X and invariant under isomorphism; a coherent module is of finite type by definition; restrictions of coherent modules to open subschemes are coherent; and the zero module is coherent. On a locally Noetherian scheme the kernel condition is automatic for finite-type quasi-coherent modules, and the theorem on this page proves the converse direction: there, finite type and coherent coincide (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). Over a non-Noetherian ring the two notions differ, as the A=OX example above shows, and the relation-kernel condition must be checked; the remark on this page records that warning.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources