How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coherent module sheaves
Definition
Let be a scheme and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme) that is of finite type (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves). Then is coherent if for every open and every morphism the kernel sheaf is of finite type (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).
Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the associated-sheaf existence theorem at the sheaf-kernel identification below, the following affine test is equivalent to the definition. Since the conditions are local, it suffices to test affine opens on which for a finitely generated -module : then a morphism is given by an -linear map (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves) and, as localisation is exact (Localisation of modules is exact), the kernel sheaf has , so it is the associated sheaf of the finitely generated module precisely when that kernel is finitely generated (The associated module sheaf exists).
Finite presentation does not imply coherence under the same AC assumption. Over a general base the kernel condition is a genuine additional hypothesis. Let be a field and let the classes of form a -basis of , so as a -module, and multiplication by , viewed as an -linear map , has kernel , which is not finitely generated as an -module. The module is finitely presented, even free of rank one, but the associated sheaf on receives the morphism corresponding to (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, The associated module sheaf exists) whose kernel is the associated sheaf of and is not of finite type. Hence is not coherent on this ; finite presentation, and even local freeness of finite rank, do not by themselves imply coherence over an arbitrary base. The identification of coherent with finite type is a theorem about locally Noetherian schemes, proved on this page; over a locally Noetherian scheme finite locally free sheaves are therefore coherent.
Immediate consequences. Coherence is local on and invariant under isomorphism; a coherent module is of finite type by definition; restrictions of coherent modules to open subschemes are coherent; and the zero module is coherent. On a locally Noetherian scheme the kernel condition is automatic for finite-type quasi-coherent modules, and the theorem on this page proves the converse direction: there, finite type and coherent coincide (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). Over a non-Noetherian ring the two notions differ, as the example above shows, and the relation-kernel condition must be checked; the remark on this page records that warning.
Depends on
Used by
- Deformation cohomology of a smooth scheme: tangent, obstruction and automorphism spaces Corollary
- Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve Corollary
- Euler characteristic in a proper flat family is locally constant Corollary
- Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field Corollary
- Global functions on geometrically connected and geometrically reduced proper schemes Corollary
- Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions Corollary
- h0 differs from the Euler characteristic before vanishing Counterexample
- Proper cohomology need not be finite for noncoherent sheaves Counterexample
- The intersection product needs Cartier or complementary-dimension hypotheses Counterexample
- Base points and base-point-free linear systems Definition
- Cohomology and base-change map Definition
- Complete linear system Definition
- Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme Definition
- Delta invariant of a curve singularity Definition
- Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal Definition
- Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf Definition
- Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve Definition
- Grothendieck groups of coherent sheaves and of vector bundles on a scheme Definition
- Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme Definition
- Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface Definition
- Marked ideals and their support Definition
- Normalization defect delta of a reduced curve Definition
- Order of an ideal sheaf at a point Definition
- The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D) Definition
- All twists on the projective line Example
- Hilbert polynomial of projective space Example
- A vector bundle on the projective line has a line subbundle of maximal degree Lemma
- Addition and multiplication of marked ideals Lemma
- Arithmetic genus, geometric genus and delta invariants Lemma
- Blowing up a non-regular point strictly increases the finite normalization subalgebra Lemma
- Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward Lemma
- Cycles of coherent sheaves and of closed subschemes, with flat pullback Lemma
- Etale pullback commutes with derivative ideals Lemma
- Euler characteristic and normalization defect under a point blowup Lemma
- Euler characteristic changes by the residue degree Lemma
- Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences Lemma
- Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist Lemma
- Euler characteristic of line bundles on a projective line over a finite field extension Lemma
- Eventual generation of coherent projective twists Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
…and 48 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, §§26.5, 26.7, 26.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Chapters 6, 14, 17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes §30.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Properties of Schemes, §§28.20, 28.26 (standard reference, not scraped)