Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the finiteness and long-exactness suppliers cited below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field), let X be a scheme proper over k (Proper morphisms), and let 0⟶F′→ α F→ β F′′⟶0 be a short exact sequence of OX-modules (Exact sequences of sheaves, Modules on a ringed space) in which the three terms F′, F and F′′ are coherent (Coherent module sheaves). Then χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′), where χ is the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf.

The empty source X=∅, the zero sheaf in any of the three positions, the degenerate cases in which one of the outer maps is an isomorphism and every field k are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k, a scheme X proper over k, and a short exact sequence 0→F′→αF→βF′′→0 of coherent OX-modules.

[F1]

The Euler characteristic: for a field k, a scheme X proper over k and a coherent OX-module G, the cohomology groups Hq(X,G) are k-vector spaces, only finitely many of them are nonzero, and χ(X,G)=∑q≥0(−1)qdim⁡kHq(X,G) is a well-defined integer; if X=∅ or G=0 then Hq(X,G)=0 in every degree and χ(X,G)=0. (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf)

[F2]

Finite-dimensionality and eventual vanishing: for a field k, a scheme X proper over k and a coherent OX-module G, every group Hq(X,G) is a finite-dimensional k-vector space and Hq(X,G)=0 for all sufficiently large q. (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field)

[F3]

The long exact sequence, with its k-linearity: a short exact sequence of OX-modules induces a long exact sequence of k-vector spaces ⋯→Hq(X,F′)→ αq Hq(X,F)→ βq Hq(X,F′′)→ δq Hq+1(X,F′)→⋯ , natural in the short exact sequence, with αq=Hq(X,α), βq=Hq(X,β) and δq the connecting map, and with Hq(X,−)=0 for q<0. All maps displayed are k-linear: scalar multiplication by λ∈k on an OX-module is a morphism mλ of OX-modules, naturality of the sequence with respect to the morphism of short exact sequences induced by mλ identifies the scalar action on each Hq with Hq(X,mλ) and makes αq, βq and δq commute with scalar multiplication. The groups carry the k-vector space structure of [F1] and [F2]. (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, Modules on a ringed space, Exact sequences of sheaves, Vector space over a field, Finite coherent cohomology for proper schemes, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field)

[F4]

Rank-nullity: for a k-linear map T:V→W of k-vector spaces with V finite-dimensional, dim⁡kV=dim⁡kker⁡T+dim⁡kim⁡T, and for a surjective T the target satisfies dim⁡kW=dim⁡kV−dim⁡kker⁡T. (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T, Rank and nullity of a linear map with finite-dimensional domain, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis)

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is the choice principle named in the statement. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct: write the Euler characteristics as finite alternating sums of dimensions using the finiteness corollary, form the long exact cohomology sequence of the short exact sequence, apply rank-nullity at each degree to express the dimensions of the middle and outer groups through the images of the three families of maps, and sum with alternating signs so that the connecting-map contributions telescope to zero
1.1F1F2F3

Setup and finiteness. By [F1] and [F2] applied to each of the coherent modules F′, F and F′′, every group appearing below is a finite-dimensional k-vector space, the three Euler characteristics χ(X,F′), χ(X,F) and χ(X,F′′) are well-defined integers, and there is an integer M≥0 with Hq(X,G)=0 for every q>M and each G∈{F′,F,F′′}; moreover Hq(X,G)=0 for every q<0 by [F3]. Consequently each of the three sums defining χ is a finite sum over the finitely many degrees q=0,1,…,M in which a nonzero group can occur.

1.2F3

The long exact sequence. Applying [F3] to the short exact sequence of the statement gives the long exact sequence ⋯→Hq−1(X,F′′)→ δq−1 Hq(X,F′)→ αq Hq(X,F)→ βq Hq(X,F′′)→ δq Hq+1(X,F′)→⋯ , exact at every term, with all maps k-linear. Exactness gives im⁡αq=ker⁡βq,im⁡βq=ker⁡δq,im⁡δq−1=ker⁡αq for every q∈Z.

1.3F41.2

Dimension identities. Put aq=dim⁡kHq(X,F′), bq=dim⁡kHq(X,F) and cq=dim⁡kHq(X,F′′), finite numbers by 1.1. By [F4] applied to the k-linear maps βq, αq and δq, using the exactness identifications of 1.2, bq=dim⁡kim⁡αq+dim⁡kim⁡βq,aq=dim⁡kim⁡δq−1+dim⁡kim⁡αq,cq=dim⁡kim⁡βq+dim⁡kim⁡δq. Indeed, for βq the kernel is im⁡αq; for αq the kernel is im⁡δq−1; for δq the kernel is im⁡βq.

1.41.11.3algebra

Alternating sum. Multiplying the three identities of 1.3 by (−1)q and summing over q∈Z, a finite sum by 1.1, and using the linearity of the sum, ∑q(−1)qbq=∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡αq+∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡βq, while ∑q(−1)qaq+∑q(−1)qcq=∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡αq+∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡βq+∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡δq−1+∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡δq. The two connecting-map sums cancel: the index shift q↦q−1 gives ∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡δq−1=−∑q(−1)qdim⁡kim⁡δq, the q=0 term of the first sum being dim⁡kim⁡δ−1=0 because H−1=0 by 1.1 and the finite range 0,…,M makes the shift legitimate. Hence ∑q(−1)qaq+∑q(−1)qcq=∑q(−1)qbq.

1.5F11.11.4

Conclusion. Restricting the sums of 1.4 to the degrees q=0,…,M on which the groups can be nonzero and replacing the dimension sums by the Euler characteristics through [F1] gives χ(X,F)=∑q≥0(−1)qbq=∑q≥0(−1)qaq+∑q≥0(−1)qcq=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′), which is the asserted additivity.

2.1F1F2F3F51.1∎

Boundaries and choice. If X=∅ then every OX-module is zero, so F′=F=F′′=0, all cohomology vanishes and the identity reads 0=0+0 by [F1]. If F=0 then β is the zero map and F′′=im⁡β=0, while α is injective with image ker⁡β=0, so F′=0, and again the identity reduces to 0=0+0; the same argument applies when any one of the three terms is zero, the sequence then exhibiting an isomorphism between the other two and reducing the identity to the tautology χ(X,G)=χ(X,G)+0. Since k is a field it is not the zero ring, and the trivial short exact sequence 0→F→F→0→0 is included with χ(X,F)=χ(X,F)+0. The endpoint degrees are covered by 1.1 and 1.4: the sums are finite, the degree q=0 is included, and the terms with q<0 and q>M vanish on both sides. The Axiom of Choice [F5] is inherited through the finiteness corollary of [F2], which uses it to produce the finite-dimensionality and the vanishing bound, and through the long exact sequence of [F3], which uses it to supply the injective resolutions defining sheaf cohomology and the connecting maps; no further selection is made, the data of the statement and the integer M being fixed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources