Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix a topological space X, let Γ(X,−):Ab(X)→Ab be the additive left exact global-sections functor (Global sections of an abelian sheaf), and let I be the supplied functorial injective resolution datum on Ab(X) of Enough injective abelian sheaves: it assigns to every abelian sheaf F one specific injective resolution 0→F→I∙(F) (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data).

For every q≥0 and every abelian sheaf F on X define the q-th sheaf cohomology group of F to be the right derived object of Γ(X,−) relative to I: Hq(X,F):=RIqΓ(X,F)=Hq(Γ(X,I∙(F)del)), the cohomology object of the complex Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F))→⋯ of abelian groups obtained from the deleted resolution (Deleted resolutions, Cohomology object of a cochain complex). We also set Hq(X,F):=0 for q<0.

Because I is a fixed supplied datum, the group Hq(X,F) is a specific group for each pair (X,F), and for a morphism φ:F→G of abelian sheaves we write Hq(X,φ):=RIqΓ(X,φ) for the induced map; it is the map on cohomology induced by Γ(X,−) applied to the cochain maps supplied with the datum, and it is additive in φ.

If J is another supplied injective resolution datum on Ab(X) then RIqΓ(X,−) and RJqΓ(X,−) are naturally isomorphic, so the Hq(X,F) computed from J agree with the ones above up to a canonical natural isomorphism; the Axiom of Dependent Choice needed for that comparison follows from AC (Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors, AC implies DC implies countable choice). The notation Hq(X,F) therefore does not depend on the datum used, up to this canonical isomorphism, and we call q the cohomological degree.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources