How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Acyclic open cover for a sheaf
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, let be a topological space and let be a sheaf of abelian groups on , with sheaf cohomology of an open subspace as in Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections and acyclicity over an open subspace as in Gamma-acyclic abelian sheaf; the Axiom of Choice is assumed because these groups are formed from the supplied injective resolutions (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be an open cover of indexed by a linearly ordered set, with ordered Čech cochains (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover). The cover is -acyclic, or a Leray cover for , when for every nonempty finite set of indices the sheaf is -acyclic on the open subspace , that is, when where is the restriction of to the open subspace (Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace, Gamma-acyclic abelian sheaf).
Equivalently: is -acyclic for every open set that is a finite nonempty intersection of members of . The single member case is included, so every member is required to be such a , and the condition involves only the open sets occurring in and not the chosen linear order of the index set: reindexing , or passing to a cover with the same members, does not change whether is -acyclic. An intersection that happens to be empty contributes no condition: the space is then empty and every sheaf on it is the zero sheaf, because is a singleton (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set), so is the zero functor, which is exact, and its positive derived functors vanish (An exact functor has vanishing positive derived functors).
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiahui Gao and Shuwu Zhang, Lectures on Algebraic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)