How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Refinement-colimit Čech cohomology
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a topological space and let be a sheaf of abelian groups on . The topology is a set of open subsets. Fix a well-order of using the Axiom of Choice, and let consist of all subsets whose union is , each indexed by its distinct members in the inherited well-order. This is a set of ordered covers. An arbitrary indexed open cover is represented by its distinct-member cover: under Choice, one may choose an index for each distinct member, so the two cover presentations refine one another and yield canonically isomorphic Čech cohomology under refinement independence. For write for its fixed-cover Čech cohomology (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology).
Say that , or that refines , when there is a refinement function from to , that is, a map from the index set of to the index set of with for every (Refinement map of ordered open covers). This relation is a preorder: it is reflexive through the identity map, and it is transitive because a composite of refinement functions is a refinement function. It is directed: for covers the set of distinct intersections is another member of , indexed by the same inherited well-order, and covers . For each , choose the least and the least with ; the resulting maps refine to both covers. Repeating this construction stays within the same set .
The Axiom of Choice is used to fix transition data: for every pair choose one refinement function from to . By Refinement choices induce the same Čech map any two refinement functions from to induce the same homomorphism in every degree, so the chosen data give well-defined maps and these maps are compatible with composition and with identities: the composite of the chosen refinement functions along is again a refinement function from to and hence induces the composite of the two induced maps, while the identity is a refinement function of a cover to itself and induces the identity. Thus is a functor from the directed preorder to the category of abelian groups.
The Čech cohomology of with values in is the filtered colimit taken in the category of abelian groups, of that functor (Filtered categories and filtered colimits). A class of is represented by a pair with and , and two such pairs represent the same class exactly when the two classes agree after refinement to a common cover. A morphism of abelian sheaves induces the maps on fixed covers, which commute with the refinement maps because the cochain maps of Refinement map of ordered open covers are defined componentwise from the values of the cochains; these maps pass to the filtered colimit and give so that is a functor on the abelian sheaves on with for .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiahui Gao and Shuwu Zhang, Lectures on Algebraic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)