Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The one-member cover of the circle has no Čech H1, but the sheaf H1 is nonzero

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let X be a topological space, F a sheaf of abelian groups on X and U an open cover of X indexed by a linearly ordered set. The claim that the Čech-to-sheaf comparison map (Canonical map from fixed-cover Čech to sheaf cohomology) φUp:Hˇp(U,F)⟶Hp(X,F) is an isomorphism for every p≥0 is refuted. The refutation takes X=S1 the circle (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0]), F=Z‾ the constant sheaf with value Z on it, identified with the sheaf of locally constant Z-valued functions (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions), and the one-member cover U=({S1}): then Hˇ0(U,Z‾)≅Γ(S1,Z‾),Hˇ1(U,Z‾)=0, while the sheaf cohomology does not vanish in degree one, H1(S1,Z‾)≠0, a nonzero class being the connecting class of a global section of the quotient sheaf Q of continuous real functions by locally constant integer functions (A global section of the quotient that does not lift, and its nonzero connecting class). Consequently φU1 is the zero homomorphism from the zero group into the nonzero group H1(S1,Z‾): it is not surjective and not an isomorphism. The cover is not Z‾-acyclic, so the acyclicity hypothesis of the Leray comparison theorem (Leray acyclic-cover comparison) is genuinely needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For an open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set, Cp(U,F)=∏i0<⋯<ipF(Ui0∩⋯∩Uip), and when the index set has no increasing (p+1)-tuple the product is empty and Cp(U,F)=0 (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover).

[F2]

The fixed-cover Čech cohomology is Hˇp(U,F)=ker⁡δp/im⁡δp−1 (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology).

[F3]

For every open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set the comparison map φUp:Hˇp(U,F)→Hp(X,F) is defined, assuming the Axiom of Choice, via the Godement resolution (Canonical map from fixed-cover Čech to sheaf cohomology).

[F4]

On the circle there is a global section of the quotient sheaf Q whose connecting class in H1(S1,Z‾) is nonzero; in particular H1(S1,Z‾)≠0 for the constant sheaf with value Z (A global section of the quotient that does not lift, and its nonzero connecting class).

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F6]

A cover U is F-acyclic exactly when Hq(W,F∣W)=0 for every q>0 and every nonempty finite intersection W of members of U (Acyclic open cover for a sheaf).

[F7]

If U is F-acyclic then the comparison map is an isomorphism in every degree (Leray acyclic-cover comparison).

[F8]

The constant sheaf with value A is canonically isomorphic to the sheaf of locally constant A-valued functions, θ:AX≅A‾loc (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).

[F9]

The circle is S1=R/Z with quotient topology induced by p(x)=[x] (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0]).

Counterexample

Given: The circle S1 with quotient map p, the constant sheaf Z‾ with value Z on S1, the one-member cover U=(U0) with U0:=S1, and the sheaf cohomology H∙(S1,−) formed from the supplied injective resolution datum.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1

Take X=S1 the circle with quotient map p [F9], the index set I={0} with its unique linear order and U0:=S1; the circle is open in itself, so U=(U0) is a cover of X=S1 by open subsets. The increasing tuples in I are the single 0-tuple (0) in degree 0, and there is no increasing (p+1)-tuple for p≥1; hence by [F1] C0(U,Z‾)=Z‾(U0)=Z‾(S1),Cp(U,Z‾)=0(p≥1). So the differential δ0:C0→C1 has target 0 and is the zero map, and all higher differentials vanish as well. By [F2] the cohomology of the complex C0→0→⋯ is Hˇ0(U,Z‾)=ker⁡δ0=C0=Z‾(S1) and Hˇp(U,Z‾)=ker⁡δp/im⁡δp−1=0/0=0 for every p≥1; in particular Hˇ1(U,Z‾)=0.

F1F2F9
2.1

By [F4] there is a global section q of the quotient sheaf Q on S1 — the sheafification of the presheaf quotient of the continuous real-valued functions by the locally constant integer-valued functions — whose connecting class ∂(q)∈H1(S1,Z‾) is nonzero; hence H1(S1,Z‾)≠0. The coefficient sheaf there is the constant sheaf with value Z on S1, identified with the subsheaf of locally constant integer-valued functions [F8], which is the same sheaf Z‾ used in [step 1.1]; the two occurrences of H1(S1,Z‾) denote the same group, formed from the same fixed injective resolution datum.

F4F8
3.1

By [F3], under the Axiom of Choice, the comparison map for the cover U of [step 1.1] is defined: φU1:Hˇ1(U,Z‾)⟶H1(S1,Z‾). Its source is the zero group by [step 1.1], so φU1 is the zero homomorphism, while its target is nonzero by [step 2.1]. A homomorphism whose target is nonzero and whose source is the zero group has image 0≠H1(S1,Z‾), so it is not surjective and in particular not an isomorphism.

F3step 2.1step 1.1
4.1

The cover U is not Z‾-acyclic. Indeed, by [F6] U is Z‾-acyclic exactly when Hq(W,Z‾∣W)=0 for every q>0 and every nonempty finite intersection W of members of U; the only member is U0=S1, so the only such W is S1 itself, whose restriction of Z‾ is Z‾, and H1(S1,Z‾)≠0 by [step 2.1]. Hence the hypothesis of the Leray comparison theorem [F7] fails for this cover, and no contradiction with that theorem arises from [step 3.1]: the theorem gives an isomorphism only for F-acyclic covers, and the one-member cover of the circle is not one.

F6F7step 2.1
5.1

Assembling the pieces for the circle, the constant sheaf Z‾ and the one-member cover {S1}: Hˇ1(U,Z‾)=0 by [step 1.1], the comparison map φU1 is the zero map out of the zero group by [step 3.1], the sheaf cohomology H1(S1,Z‾) is nonzero by [step 2.1], and the cover fails acyclicity by [step 4.1]. Therefore the assertion that the comparison map φUp is an isomorphism in every degree for every cover is false, with degree p=1 and this cover as the witness; on the other hand φU0 is an isomorphism for every cover, since it is the identity of the global sections up to the canonical identifications, so degree zero provides no obstruction. The Axiom of Choice of [F5] enters exactly twice: in [step 3.1] through the construction of the comparison map, which uses the Godement resolution of [F3], and in [step 2.1] through the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology of [F4], whose connecting homomorphism is formed from injective resolutions; no other selection is used, the cochains of [step 1.1] being a single section group. ∎

F3F4F5step 4.1step 3.1step 2.1step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources