Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A global section of the quotient that does not lift, and its nonzero connecting class

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let S1=R/Z be the circle with quotient map p (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0]), let C be the sheaf of continuous real-valued functions on S1, let Z‾ be the subsheaf of locally constant integer-valued functions, that is the constant sheaf with value Z (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions), and let Q be the sheafification of the presheaf quotient V↦C(V)/Z‾(V), so that the induced map of sheaves C→Q is an epimorphism. The claim that the induced map on global sections Γ(S1,C)⟶Γ(S1,Q) is surjective is refuted. The refutation exhibits a global section q∈Γ(S1,Q) with no preimage, glued from the two angle branches over the arcs U0=p((−1/2,1/2)) and U1=p((0,1)), and shows that its connecting class ∂(q)∈H1(S1,Z‾) in the long exact sequence of the short exact sequence 0→Z‾→C→Q→0 is nonzero; in particular H1(S1,Z‾)≠0, so the degree one cohomology of the constant sheaf Z on the circle does not vanish.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

A short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on X gives a natural long exact sequence ⋯→Hq(X,F′)→Hq(X,F)→Hq(X,F′′)→∂qHq+1(X,F′)→⋯ (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).

[F3]

H0(X,F) is canonically isomorphic to the global sections Γ(X,F), naturally in F (Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections).

[F4]

A sequence of sheaves is exact at a term when the image sheaf of the incoming morphism equals the kernel sheaf of the outgoing one (Exact sequences of sheaves).

[F5]

A sequence of sheaves of abelian groups is exact if and only if all of its stalk sequences are exact (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).

[F6]

Sheafification induces a bijection on every stalk, ηF,x:Fx→(aF)x (Sheafification preserves stalks, Sheafification of a presheaf).

[F7]

The filtered colimit functor on abelian groups is exact, so the colimit of a filtered diagram of short exact sequences of abelian groups is short exact (Filtered colimits of abelian groups are exact).

[F8]

The constant sheaf with value Z is the sheaf of locally constant Z-valued functions, Z‾(U)={f:U→Z locally constant} (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).

[F9]

The circle is S1=R/Z with the quotient topology induced by p(x)=[x] (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0]), so a subset of S1 is open exactly when its preimage under p is open in R (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection).

[F11]

X is connected exactly when it admits no separation, that is, no pair of open, nonempty, disjoint subsets with union X (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).

[F12]

For a sheaf of abelian groups on X the sequence of sheaves 0→F′→F→F′′→0 is exact exactly when every stalk sequence 0→Fx′→Fx→Fx′′→0 is exact, since exactness of a sequence of sheaves is tested stalkwise [F5]; the last map is an epimorphism when it is stalkwise surjective, the cokernel sheaf being the sheafification of the presheaf cokernel (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).

[F13]

In ZF the Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Counterexample

Given: The circle S1=R/Z with quotient map p, the sheaves C, Z‾ and Q of the statement, the two arcs U0=p((−1/2,1/2)) and U1=p((0,1)), and the sections θi inverse to p over the corresponding intervals.

1.1

The sequence 0→Z‾→C→Q→0 is short exact, where the first map is the inclusion of locally constant integer-valued functions and the second is induced by the presheaf quotient maps C(V)→C(V)/Z‾(V) followed by sheafification. The kernel of the second map is Z‾: its stalk at x is computed from the stalk of Q, which is the colimit of the groups C(V)/Z‾(V) over the filtered neighbourhood system of x by [F6], and this colimit is Cx/Z‾x because filtered colimits of abelian groups are exact [F7]; hence the stalk of the kernel is Z‾x for every x, and kernels of sheaf morphisms are computed stalkwise [F12]. The second map is an epimorphism with the same stalkwise computation, its stalk at x being the surjection Cx→Cx/Z‾x; by [F5] and [F4] the displayed sequence is short exact.

F4F5F6F7F12
1.2

Put A:=(−1/2,1/2) and B:=(0,1) and U0:=p(A), U1:=p(B). Both are open in S1, because p−1(U0)=A+Z and p−1(U1)=B+Z are unions of open intervals, hence open in R [F9]. Both are connected, being continuous images under p of the intervals A and B [F10]. Their union is S1: every real number is congruent modulo Z to a point of A∪B=(−1/2,1), so every class in S1 lies in U0∪U1. Their intersection is p(A∩(B+Z))=p((−1/2,0)∪(0,1/2))=p((1/2,1))∪p((0,1/2)), a union of two disjoint nonempty open connected subsets, so U0∩U1 has exactly these two connected components; neither of them meets the other since they are disjoint and open, so every connected subset of the intersection lies in one of them [F11].

F9F10F11
2.1

On a connected open subset of S1 every locally constant Z-valued function is constant: its fibres are open, pairwise disjoint and cover the set, and two nonempty fibres would exhibit a separation [F11]; so by [F8] the sections of Z‾ over U0 and over U1 are the constant integer functions, Z‾(U0)≅Z and Z‾(U1)≅Z, while over the two-component intersection Z‾(U0∩U1)≅Z×Z, a locally constant function on the intersection being determined by, and arbitrary on, the two components of [step 1.2].

F8F11step 1.2
2.2

Let θ0:U0→A and θ1:U1→B be the inverses of the bijections induced by p on A and B; they are continuous because p is a quotient map and these are homeomorphisms onto their images [F9]. On U0∩U1 the difference θ1−θ0 is a continuous integer-valued function: the two lifts of a point of the intersection differ by an integer, and on p((0,1/2)) both lifts lie in (0,1/2), giving the value 0, while on p((1/2,1)) the lift in B is the lift in A shifted by 1, giving the value 1. Hence θ0 and θ1 have the same image in Q(U0∩U1), since their difference lies in Z‾(U0∩U1), and the sheaf axiom for Q over the cover S1=U0∪U1 glues them to a global section q∈Γ(S1,Q),q∣U0=[θ0],q∣U1=[θ1].

F9step 1.2
3.1

There is no g∈Γ(S1,C) with image q. Suppose there were. Then on each Ui the difference g∣Ui−θi has zero image in Q(Ui), hence has locally constant integer values; being continuous with values in the discrete set Z, it is locally constant and therefore constant on the connected set Ui [step 1.2], say g∣Ui−θi=ni with ni∈Z by [step 2.1]. On the first component p((0,1/2)) of the intersection the difference θ1−θ0 vanishes, so n1−n0=(θ0−θ1)∣=0; on the second component p((1/2,1)) the same difference equals 1, so n1−n0=−1. This is impossible, so q is not in the image of Γ(S1,C)→Γ(S1,Q).

step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

By [F2] applied to the short exact sequence of [step 1.1] the sequence Γ(S1,C)⟶Γ(S1,Q)→ ∂ H1(S1,Z‾) is exact, the first group being H0(S1,C) and the middle one H0(S1,Q) by [F3]; exactness at the middle group [F4] says that the image of the first map is the kernel of ∂. By [step 3.1] the element q is not in that image, so ∂(q)≠0 and H1(S1,Z‾)≠0; the section q is thus an explicit witness for the failure of surjectivity asserted in the statement, and its obstruction is detected by the degree one connecting class. The Axiom of Choice enters exactly through the long exact sequence [F2], whose construction uses the supplied injective resolution datum and the Dependent Choice it requires [F13]; the computations of [step 1.2], [step 2.1], [step 2.2] and [step 3.1] use no choice principle. ∎

F2F3F4F13step 3.1step 1.1

Remarks

The failure of right exactness of the global-sections functor that the published counterexample Global sections need not preserve surjections records is reproved here on the circle, together with the additional positive information that the connecting class of the non-liftable section is a nonzero class in H1(S1,Z‾).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

102 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources