Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, let X be a topological space, and let Hq(X,−) be sheaf cohomology computed from the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I on Ab(X) (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections). Then for every abelian sheaf F on X there is a canonical isomorphism H0(X,F)→ ∼ Γ(X,F), natural in F; it identifies H0(X,F) with the kernel of Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F)).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

H0(X,F)=RI0Γ(X,F) is the zeroth right derived object of Γ(X,−) relative to the supplied datum I, and H0(X,−):=RI0Γ(X,−) is functorial in F (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

[F2]

For an additive left exact functor F and a supplied injective resolution datum I on a class D, every A∈D carries a canonical isomorphism RI0F(A)→F(A), natural in A (The zero-th right derived functor of a left exact functor recovers the functor).

[F3]

Γ(X,−) is additive and left exact (Global sections of an abelian sheaf).

[F4]
[F5]

I assigns to every abelian sheaf on X a specific injective resolution, and Ab(X) has enough injectives (Enough injective abelian sheaves).

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a topological space X and an abelian sheaf F on X.

1.1

By [F4] the Axiom of Choice gives the Axiom of Dependent Choice in ZF, which is the hypothesis under which [F2] and the comparison theorems for right derived functors are stated.

F4given
1.2

By [F3] the functor Γ(X,−) is additive and left exact, and by [F5] the supplied datum I assigns a specific injective resolution to every abelian sheaf on X, so F lies in the domain of I. Hence the hypotheses of [F2] are met by F=Γ(X,−), the datum I and the object F.

F3F5
2.1

Applying [F2] gives a canonical isomorphism H0(X,F)=RI0Γ(X,F)→∼Γ(X,F), using the identification H0=RI0Γ of [F1]; the isomorphism is natural in F because [F2] provides a natural isomorphism of functors. [F1, F2, step 1.2]

F1F2
3.1

Spelling out the derived object, H0(X,F) is the zeroth cohomology of the complex Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F))→⋯ [F1], that is the kernel of Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F)); the isomorphism of step 2.1 is the composite of the canonical map Γ(X,F)→ker⁡(Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F))) coming from the exactness of 0→Γ(X,F)→Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F)) with its inverse, so the identification with the kernel is the canonical one. [F1, F3, step 2.1] ∎

F1F3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources