Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let 0→F′→F→F′′→0 be a short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on a topological space X, and let Hq(X,−) be sheaf cohomology computed from the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I on Ab(X) (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections). Then there is a natural long exact sequence ⋯→Hq(X,F′)→Hq(X,F)→Hq(X,F′′)→∂qHq+1(X,F′)→Hq+1(X,F)→⋯ , natural in the short exact sequence and independent of the choice of injective resolutions used to assemble it.

The derived categories and right derived functor here are taken under the standing smallness or supplied cofinal-denominator hypothesis of Derived category of an abelian category.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Γ(X,−) is additive and left exact (Global sections of an abelian sheaf).

[F2]

The supplied injective resolution datum defines RIΓ:D+(Ab(X))→D+(Ab), and Hq(X,F) is the cohomology of RIΓ(F) for a sheaf in degree zero (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, Existence of the bounded below right total derived functor).

[F3]

The derived category has its cone triangulation and every distinguished triangle induces a natural long exact cohomology sequence (The derived category inherits a triangulated structure).

[F4]

The bounded-below right total derived functor of an additive functor sends distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles (Total derived functors send distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles).

[F5]

For a cochain map f:A∙→B∙, its cone has terms Bn⊕An+1 and differential (b,a)↦(dBb+f(a),−dAa); a quasi-isomorphism is a map inducing isomorphisms on all cohomology groups (The mapping cone of a chain map, Quasi-isomorphism).

[F6]

The bounded-below right total derived functor is independent of the supplied injective replacement system up to the unique natural isomorphism compatible with coaugmentations; on cohomology this gives the canonical isomorphisms of right derived functors (Existence of the bounded below right total derived functor, Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors).

[F7]

For a K-injective complex J, localization gives a bijection Hom⁡K(K,J)→Hom⁡D(K,J); therefore maps into an injective replacement are uniquely determined up to homotopy by their derived morphisms (Morphisms into a homotopically injective complex need no roof).

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a topological space X, and a short exact sequence 0→F1→iF2→pF3→0 of abelian sheaves on X.

1.1

Regard the three sheaves as cochain complexes concentrated in degree zero. The mapping cone of i has F1 in degree −1, F2 in degree 0, and differential i. Its only possibly nonzero cohomology is H0(Cone⁡(i))=coker⁡(i)≅F3, since i is a monomorphism and the original sequence is short exact. The map Cone⁡(i)→F3 induced by p in degree zero and zero in degree −1 is therefore a quasi-isomorphism [F5]. By the cone triangulation and localization at quasi-isomorphisms, the short exact sequence determines the distinguished triangle F1→F2→F3→F1[1] in the bounded-below derived category [F3, F5].

F3F5
2.1

The bounded-below right derived functor RIΓ exists for the supplied resolution datum [F2], and Γ(X,−) is additive [F1]. It is exact as a functor of triangulated categories [F4], so applying it to the triangle of [step 1.1] gives a distinguished triangle RIΓ(F1)→RIΓ(F2)→RIΓ(F3)→RIΓ(F1)[1]. The induced maps on cohomology in the first two positions are the maps Hq(X,i) and Hq(X,p) because the derived functor is formed from the same supplied datum I that defines sheaf cohomology [F2].

F1F2F4step 1.1
3.1

The long exact cohomology sequence of the distinguished triangle of [step 2.1] exists and is natural [F3]. By [F2], its terms are exactly Hq(X,F1), Hq(X,F2) and Hq(X,F3), and its connecting map gives ∂q:Hq(X,F3)→Hq+1(X,F1). This is the asserted long exact sequence.

F2F3step 2.1
4.1

A morphism of short exact sequences gives a commutative morphism between their mapping-cone triangles in [step 1.1]. The functor RIΓ and the long exact sequence construction of [F3] preserve this morphism, so all maps, including ∂q, are natural in the short exact sequence. If a different supplied injective resolution datum is used, [F6] gives the canonical natural isomorphism of right total derived functors compatible with coaugmentations. Write jK:K→IK and j′K:K→JK for the two replacements. The comparison class cK:IK→JK is characterized by Q(cK)=Q(j′K)Q(jK)−1, uniquely in the homotopy category by [F7]. Let tI:IK[1]→IK[1] and tJ:JK[1]→JK[1] be the shift comparison classes characterized in the same way by jK[1] and j′K[1]. The two classes cK[1]tI and tJcK[1] from IK[1] to JK[1] have the same image under Q, namely Q(j′K[1])Q(jK[1])−1. The target is again K-injective, so [F7] identifies them in the homotopy category. Applying the additive functor Γ preserves that homotopy equality. These are exactly the transported shift comparisons of [F4], so the natural comparison commutes with shifts and hence with the connecting arrow. Therefore it identifies the resulting long exact sequences, proving independence of the resolutions used. ∎

F2F3F4F6F7step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources