Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lifting a morphism from an exact complex into an injective resolution

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let 0→A→ η J0→ d0 J1→ d1 ⋯ be a coaugmented cochain complex in an abelian category that is exact at every displayed term, and let 0→B→ η′ I0→ δ0 I1→ δ1 ⋯ be a coaugmented cochain complex whose terms In are all injective (Injective object, Cochain complex in an abelian category).

Then for every morphism u:A→B there is a coaugmentation-preserving cochain map φ∙:J∙→I∙, that is φ0∘η=η′∘u and δn∘φn=φn+1∘dn for all n≥0 (Chain map, A graded morphism of chain complexes); and any two such cochain maps are cochain-homotopic (A chain homotopy).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

An object I is injective when every morphism M→I out of a subobject extends over the inclusion M↣E (Injective object).

[F2]

In an abelian category, the canonical map coim⁡(d)=coker⁡(ker⁡d)→im⁡(d) is an isomorphism. Consequently, if g vanishes on ker⁡d, the cokernel universal property factors g uniquely through coim⁡(d) and hence through im⁡(d) (Abelian category).

[F3]

A cochain map is a family of morphisms commuting with the differentials, and a cochain homotopy s:f≃g satisfies fn−gn=δn−1sn+sn+1dn in the cochain indexing (Chain map, A chain homotopy, Cochain complex in an abelian category).

[F4]

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Dependent Choice, the two coaugmented complexes, and a morphism u:A→B.

1.1

By exactness at A the map η:A→J0 has zero kernel, so it is a monomorphism; the composite η′∘u:A→I0 is a morphism out of that subobject into the injective object I0, so by [F1] there is φ0:J0→I0 with φ0∘η=η′∘u. This starts a recursion in degree 0.

F1construct
2.1

Suppose φn:Jn→In has been constructed with δn−1φn−1=φndn−1 for n≥1 (for n=0 take the coaugmentation identity of step 1.1). The composite g:=δn∘φn:Jn→In+1 kills the kernel of dn, which by exactness at Jn is the image of dn−1; hence g factors as Jn↠im⁡(dn)→ gˉ In+1 through the image of dn by [F2]. By exactness at Jn+1 the image of dn is the kernel of dn+1, so the inclusion im⁡(dn)↣Jn+1 is a monomorphism; since In+1 is injective, [F1] extends gˉ to φn+1:Jn+1→In+1, and φn+1∘dn=g=δn∘φn because both sides agree on the quotient Jn↠im⁡(dn). [F1, F2, step 1.1, construct]

F1F2construct
3.1

By step 2.1 one may choose an extension φn+1 for every n≥0; the recursion produces a coaugmentation-preserving cochain map φ∙, since the identities of step 1.1 and step 2.1 are exactly φ0η=η′u and δnφn=φn+1dn. The construction makes one choice of extension in each degree n∈N, and the assumed DC, also implied by AC via [F4], ensures that an infinite sequence of nonempty choices of this recursive shape exists; hence the lift exists. [F3, F4, step 2.1]

F3F4
4.1

For the uniqueness, let φ∙,ψ∙:J∙→I∙ be coaugmentation-preserving cochain maps and put hn:=φn−ψn, so that h is a cochain map with h0∘η=0. I claim inductively that there are morphisms sn:Jn→In−1 for n≥1, with sn=0 for n≤0, satisfying hn=δn−1sn+sn+1dn: for n=0 this says h0=s1d0, and since h0 kills the kernel of d0 (which equals the image of η) it factors through the image of d0 by [F2], and that factorization extends to J1→I0 by injectivity of I0 [F1]; given sn, one computes that hn−δn−1sn kills the image of dn−1 (using the displayed identity in degree n−1 and the cochain identity for h), hence factors through the image of dn, and again [F1] extends it over the inclusion im⁡(dn)↣Jn+1, giving sn+1. [F1, F2, F3, step 3.1]

F1F2F3
5.1

The homotopy identities produced in step 4.1 require one choice in each degree, which the assumed DC provides; the sequence sn is a cochain homotopy from φ∙ to ψ∙ in the sense of [F3], so any two coaugmentation-preserving lifts are cochain-homotopic. [F3, F4, step 4.1] ∎

F3F4∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources