How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Derived category of an abelian category
Definition
Let be an abelian category. We use cochains as in Cochain complex in an abelian category, with and . Thus . The cochain category is the reindexed published homotopy category. Put
Likewise initially mean the localizations of the termwise bounded variants of Bounded, bounded below, and bounded above complexes. Roof morphisms exist by Quasi isomorphisms admit the roof calculus in the homotopy category and The calculus of fractions constructs the localization under its standing size hypothesis: a small category of complexes, or supplied small cofinal denominator families. Every assertion of Hom sets is under that hypothesis. In the bounded module models, supplied replacements will separately exhibit those Hom sets. No general local-smallness theorem for unbounded is asserted.
The cone convention is , , and its triangle ends in .
Depends on
Used by
- Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves Definition
- Cup product in sheaf cohomology Definition
- Derived operations on analytic field sheaves Definition
- Dualizing complexes and the normalized dualizing sheaf on a projective CM scheme Definition
- Equivariant constructible derived category of complex varieties Definition
- Grothendieck group of an essentially small triangulated category Definition
- Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version Definition
- The cotangent complex of a morphism of schemes Definition
- Dualizing and support shifts on the complex line Example
- Euler class of a two-term mapping cone Example
- Hard Lefschetz splitting for a three-degree complex Example
- Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations Lemma
- Acyclic product fibers stabilize bounded constructible pullback Hom Lemma
- Analytic field sheaves have injective derived models Lemma
- Cartesian simplicial sheaves model actual equivariant derived Hom Lemma
- Complex algebraic constructible complexes have finite conical cochain models Lemma
- Derived comparisons give unique normalized homotopy maps Lemma
- Derived tensor product of abelian sheaves Lemma
- Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves Lemma
- Euler class of a bounded projective complex is derived invariant and triangle additive Lemma
- Finite poset diagrams have bounded finite bar models Lemma
- Finite simplicial constructible sheaves have an actual derived incidence model Lemma
- General linear Stiefel approximations stabilize bounded constructible Hom Lemma
- General linear Stiefel perverse normalization is exact and conservative Lemma
- Independence of the cotangent complex from the chosen simplicial resolution Lemma
- K-flat sheaf complexes preserve quasi-isomorphisms Lemma
- Koszul coherence of derived sheaf tensor Lemma
- Localized cone triangles satisfy tr one through tr three Lemma
- Locally split Cech nerves give actual derived Cartesian sheaf descent Lemma
- Perfect complexes form an essentially small triangulated subcategory Lemma
- Rouquier generator complexes have canonical derived graph models Lemma
- Sheaf cohomology classes as derived morphisms Lemma
- Shifted smooth complex pullback is exact for the middle perverse t structure Lemma
- Support localization, base change, projection and trace calculus Lemma
- The bounded projective comparison for the derived category Lemma
- Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully Proposition
- Cohomology factors through the derived category Proposition
- Morphisms from a homotopically projective complex need no roof Proposition
- Morphisms into a homotopically injective complex need no roof Proposition
- The localization functor sends quasi isomorphisms to isomorphisms Proposition
…and 13 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 13.11.1–13.11.6 (standard reference, not scraped)