How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The localization functor sends quasi isomorphisms to isomorphisms
Statement
For every quasi-isomorphism , is invertible in the derived category, with inverse represented by the roof .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For every quasi-isomorphism , is invertible in the derived category, with inverse represented by the roof .
The derived category is the roof localization of the homotopy category at quasi-isomorphisms (Derived category of an abelian category).
Proof
The derived category is the localization at quasi-isomorphisms, so the proposed inverse is the allowed roof . This includes at the zero complex.
Composing the roof with gives the identity roof of in one order and in the other. The latter refines via and , so both products are identities.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 13.11.1–13.11.6 (standard reference, not scraped)