How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A complex is zero in the derived category exactly when it is acyclic
Statement
A complex becomes a zero object in if and only if for every integer .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex becomes a zero object in if and only if for every integer .
Every quasi-isomorphism becomes invertible in the derived category (The localization functor sends quasi isomorphisms to isomorphisms).
Cohomology factors through the derived category (Cohomology factors through the derived category).
Proof
First is a zero object: a roof represents the ordinary zero map, because its numerator is the composite ; dually a right roof out of is zero. Hence both Hom sets involving are singletons. If is acyclic, is a quasi-isomorphism, so .
Conversely, if is a zero object it is isomorphic to . The factored cohomology functors take this isomorphism to for every . Thus is acyclic.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 13.11.1–13.11.6 (standard reference, not scraped)