How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
fs-the-derived-category-is-the-same-category-as-the-homotopy-category.md
Statement
For every abelian category, is an equivalence of categories.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For every abelian category, is an equivalence of categories.
A complex is zero in the derived category iff it is acyclic (A complex is zero in the derived category exactly when it is acyclic).
Refutation
In abelian groups take , , , with , reduction modulo two, and other terms zero. The first map is monic, its image is the kernel of the second, and the second is epic. Thus is acyclic and .
A contraction would satisfy , giving a section . Every such homomorphism is zero because has no nonzero element killed by two. Thus in , whereas in . The functor is not faithful and cannot be an equivalence. This is a direct verification of the familiar acyclic-but-not-contractible obstruction.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Boundary check against the licensed construction (standard reference, not scraped)