How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The derived category is the verdier quotient by acyclic complexes
Statement
Let be the thick full subcategory of acyclic complexes. Define its Verdier quotient here by inverting maps whose cones are acyclic. Under the standing size assumption this quotient is . An exact functor annihilating acyclic complexes factors uniquely through an exact functor ; conversely any such factorization annihilates acyclics. The kernel of is exactly .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Let be the thick full subcategory of acyclic complexes. Define its Verdier quotient here by inverting maps whose cones are acyclic. Under the standing size assumption this quotient is . An exact functor annihilating acyclic complexes factors uniquely through an exact functor ; conversely any such factorization annihilates acyclics. The kernel of is exactly .
The acyclic complexes form a thick full subcategory of the homotopy category (The full subcategory of acyclic complexes is thick in the homotopy category).
A map is a quasi-isomorphism exactly when its cone is acyclic (A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism exactly when its cone is acyclic).
The derived category is triangulated and its localization functor is exact (The derived category inherits a triangulated structure).
A complex is zero in the derived category exactly when it is acyclic (A complex is zero in the derived category exactly when it is acyclic).
Both representable Hom sequences of a distinguished triangle are exact (Long exact Hom sequences of a distinguished triangle).
Proof
The acyclic subcategory is thick, and a map has acyclic cone exactly when it is a quasi-isomorphism. Thus the indicated quotient inverts precisely the denominators used to construct , with its proved triangulation. Its kernel is precisely the complexes with zero cohomology, including the zero complex.
If exact kills acyclics, a denominator triangle becomes . Hom exactness implies is bijective for every . Taking supplies a right inverse; injectivity at shows it is also a left inverse. Thus is invertible and localization gives a unique factorization.
Its additivity follows from the common-denominator sum formula and additivity of . The shift comparison descends by naturality for inverse denominators. Each distinguished triangle is an isomorphic image of a triangle, so its image under is distinguished because is exact. Conversely any exact factor through takes an acyclic to the image of a zero object, hence to zero.
Depends on
- The derived category inherits a triangulated structure
- A complex is zero in the derived category exactly when it is acyclic
- A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism exactly when its cone is acyclic
- The full subcategory of acyclic complexes is thick in the homotopy category
- Long exact Hom sequences of a distinguished triangle
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Definition 13.6.7, specialized to acyclic complexes (standard reference, not scraped)