How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Extension-by-zero generators detect sheaf-cohomology vanishing
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian topological space (Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets) with for an integer (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention), and assume that for every open subset and every integer the cohomology group vanishes, where is the inclusion, is the constant sheaf associated to the constant presheaf with value on (Abelian sheaves form a Grothendieck category, Sheafification of a presheaf) and is extension by zero (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace), cohomology being that of Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections. Then for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every integer .
Facts & Assumptions
For a small filtered diagram of abelian sheaves on a Noetherian space with presheaf colimit and , the sheaf with the canonical maps is the colimit of the diagram in , and the canonical map is an isomorphism for every (Filtered colimits and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian spaces).
The second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma gives that the canonical map induced by the maps is an isomorphism (Filtered colimits and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian spaces).
A subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf generated by finitely many sections over compact open subsets admits a chain of subsheaves and, for every , compact open subsets with a short exact sequence (Finite filtration of a generated subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf).
The subsheaf generated by a family of sections is the smallest subsheaf of abelian groups containing the generators: if is a subsheaf of abelian groups with for all , then , and sections of the generated subsheaf over an open are exactly the sections whose germs lie in the stalk subgroups generated by the germs of the generators (The subsheaf generated by a family of sections).
A short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups induces a natural long exact sequence of cohomology groups, natural in the short exact sequence (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).
Extension by zero along an open inclusion is left adjoint to restriction, (Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves).
Every morphism of presheaves from into a sheaf factors uniquely through the sheafification map, so morphisms out of the constant sheaf correspond to elements of (Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves).
Every open subset of a Noetherian space is compact (Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets).
In every morphism has a kernel and a cokernel sheaf, the cokernel being the sheafification of the cokernel presheaf, and the resulting sequence is exact (Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories, Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified, Exact sequences of sheaves).
In ZF the Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice, the principle under which the supplied injective resolution data and derived functors are constructed (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Proof
Given: A Noetherian topological space with , the vanishing hypothesis for all open and all , an arbitrary sheaf of abelian groups on , the set of all sections of over compact open subsets and the subsheaves they generate.
Let be the disjoint union of the sets over the compact open subsets , a set, and for a finite subset let be the subsheaf generated by the sections in over their compact open domains. If then by the minimality half of [F4], so the assignment is a diagram indexed by the directed partially ordered set of finite subsets of (Filtered categories and filtered colimits), and the inclusions form a cocone on it with vertex . For every open the canonical map is an isomorphism: it is injective because every is a subset of and an element of the filtered colimit of these subsets is zero in only if it is zero in the stage in which it appears, and it is surjective because for the open set is compact by [F8], so is one of the sections in and by [F4]. Hence the canonical morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism of presheaves, therefore of sheaves, and [F1] applies to the diagram with colimit . [F1, F4, F8, given]
Fix a finite with elements and suppose ; write with having elements and let be the subsheaf generated by the sections over the domains of . Let be the cokernel sheaf of the inclusion, so that by [F9] there is a short exact sequence ; by [F5] its long exact sequence contains the exact portion for every . If and for all , then for all : the image of the first map is , so the second map is injective and its target is . Thus, by induction on , the vanishing for all finitely generated follows once it is proved for subsheaves generated by a single section over a compact open subset; the case is by [F4]. [F4, F5, F9, given]
By [step 1.1] and the second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma [F2], for every . Consequently it suffices to prove for every finite and every : then the colimit on the right is a filtered colimit of zero groups, as each vanishes and the transition maps are the induced maps on cohomology, and the group is therefore zero. [F2, step 1.1, given]
It remains to treat a subsheaf of generated by one section over a compact open , which by [step 1.2] is the missing input for the induction; note that in [step 1.2] is of this form, being generated by the image of . Consider the morphism corresponding under [F6] and [F7] to the element ; its adjoint transpose carries the canonical section to , and its image is a subsheaf of containing , so by the minimality half of [F4] the image contains the subsheaf generated by , which is . Conversely, each image germ at is an integer multiple of , while at the source stalk vanishes; the stalk description [F4] therefore places every image section in . Thus the image is exactly , and the induced map is an epimorphism, is a subsheaf of (Subsheaves), and [F9] gives a short exact sequence [F4, F6, F7, F9, step 1.2, given]
The identification of the constant sheaves [F7] makes the adjoint of the identity a monomorphism whose image is the subsheaf of sections of supported in , so the subsheaf of [step 2.2] is a subsheaf of , and the same holds for every subsheaf of .
Apply the construction of [step 1.1] with replaced by : the disjoint union of the sets over the compact open subsets is a set, and for finite the subsheaf generated by the sections in is generated by finitely many sections over compact opens and is a subsheaf of by [step 3.1]; the same argument as in [step 1.1] shows that the canonical morphism is an isomorphism of sheaves, since for every open the map is injective by the subset inclusions and surjective because is compact [F8] and every section of lies in the subsheaf it generates [F4]. By [F1] the sheaves form a small filtered diagram with colimit .
Let be finite and let be as in [step 4.1]. By [F3] there are and a chain of subsheaves of such that for each there are compact open subsets with a short exact sequence We prove for every by induction on . For this is . For the induction step, [F9] and [F5] give the exact portion and the last group vanishes for : applying [F5] to the short exact sequence of the previous display gives the exact portion , in which the outer groups vanish for by the hypothesis of the statement, so for . With for as the induction hypothesis, the first exact portion shows that for . Hence for all and all finite . [F3, F5, F9, given]
By [step 4.1] and the second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma [F2], applied to the diagram with colimit , for every ; by [step 5.1] every group in this colimit is zero for , so for every .
In the short exact sequence of [step 2.2], the long exact sequence [F5] contains the exact portion for every . For the first group vanishes by the hypothesis of the statement, since is open, and the last group vanishes by [step 6.1] because ; hence for every . [F5, step 6.1, step 2.2, given]
Combining the steps: for every finite the sheaf is generated by finitely many sections over compact opens, the induction of [step 1.2] reduces its vanishing to the case of one generator, which is [step 7.1], so for every and every finite ; then [step 2.1] identifies with the filtered colimit of these zero groups for every , which is zero. The proof is complete. The Axiom of Choice is used exactly through the vanishing theorem [F2] and the exactness statements [F1] that rest on derived global sections and injective resolutions, whose construction needs the Axiom of Dependent Choice [F10] supplied by AC. ∎
Depends on
- Filtered colimits and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian spaces
- Finite filtration of a generated subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf
- The subsheaf generated by a family of sections
- Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets
- Chain dimension and the empty-space convention
- Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace
- Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves
- Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves
- Sheafification of a presheaf
- Abelian sheaves form a Grothendieck category
- Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified
- Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Filtered categories and filtered colimits
- Subsheaves
- Morphisms of presheaves
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)