Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Extension-by-zero generators detect sheaf-cohomology vanishing

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian topological space (Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets) with dim⁡X≤d for an integer d≥0 (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention), and assume that for every open subset U⊆X and every integer q>d the cohomology group Hq(X,jU!ZU) vanishes, where jU:U↪X is the inclusion, ZU is the constant sheaf associated to the constant presheaf with value Z on U (Abelian sheaves form a Grothendieck category, Sheafification of a presheaf) and jU! is extension by zero (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace), cohomology being that of Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections. Then Hq(X,F)=0 for every sheaf of abelian groups F on X and every integer q>d.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For a small filtered diagram of abelian sheaves on a Noetherian space with presheaf colimit P and F=aP, the sheaf F with the canonical maps is the colimit of the diagram in Ab(X), and the canonical map colim⁡iHq(X,Fi)→Hq(X,F) is an isomorphism for every q≥0 (Filtered colimits and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian spaces).

[F2]

The second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma gives that the canonical map colim⁡iHq(X,Fi)→Hq(X,F) induced by the maps Hq(X,Φi) is an isomorphism (Filtered colimits and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian spaces).

[F3]

A subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf generated by finitely many sections over compact open subsets admits a chain 0=F0⊆⋯⊆FN=K of subsheaves and, for every 1≤n≤N, compact open subsets V⊆U with a short exact sequence 0→jV!ZV→jU!ZU→Fn/Fn−1→0 (Finite filtration of a generated subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf).

[F4]

The subsheaf generated by a family of sections is the smallest subsheaf of abelian groups containing the generators: if H is a subsheaf of abelian groups with sα∈H(Uα) for all α, then ⟨sα⟩⊆H, and sections of the generated subsheaf over an open W are exactly the sections whose germs lie in the stalk subgroups generated by the germs of the generators (The subsheaf generated by a family of sections).

[F5]

A short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups induces a natural long exact sequence of cohomology groups, natural in the short exact sequence (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).

[F6]

Extension by zero along an open inclusion j:U↪X is left adjoint to restriction, Hom⁡X(j!F,G)≅Hom⁡U(F,j−1G) (Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves).

[F7]

Every morphism of presheaves from F into a sheaf factors uniquely through the sheafification map, so morphisms ZU→E out of the constant sheaf correspond to elements of E(U) (Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves).

[F8]

Every open subset of a Noetherian space is compact (Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets).

[F9]

In Ab(X) every morphism has a kernel and a cokernel sheaf, the cokernel being the sheafification of the cokernel presheaf, and the resulting sequence 0→ker⁡→⋅→coker⁡→0 is exact (Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories, Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified, Exact sequences of sheaves).

[F10]

In ZF the Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice, the principle under which the supplied injective resolution data and derived functors are constructed (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Proof

Given: A Noetherian topological space X with dim⁡X≤d, the vanishing hypothesis Hq(X,jU!ZU)=0 for all open U and all q>d, an arbitrary sheaf of abelian groups F on X, the set of all sections of F over compact open subsets and the subsheaves they generate.

1.1

Let S be the disjoint union of the sets F(U) over the compact open subsets U⊆X, a set, and for a finite subset A⊆S let FA⊆F be the subsheaf generated by the sections in A over their compact open domains. If A⊆A′ then FA⊆FA′ by the minimality half of [F4], so the assignment A↦FA is a diagram indexed by the directed partially ordered set of finite subsets of S (Filtered categories and filtered colimits), and the inclusions form a cocone on it with vertex F. For every open W⊆X the canonical map colim⁡AFA(W)→F(W) is an isomorphism: it is injective because every FA(W) is a subset of F(W) and an element of the filtered colimit of these subsets is zero in F(W) only if it is zero in the stage in which it appears, and it is surjective because for s∈F(W) the open set W is compact by [F8], so s is one of the sections in S and s∈F{s}(W) by [F4]. Hence the canonical morphism of sheaves colim⁡AFA→F is an isomorphism of presheaves, therefore of sheaves, and [F1] applies to the diagram A↦FA with colimit F. [F1, F4, F8, given]

F1F4F8
1.2

Fix a finite A⊆S with n elements and suppose n≥1; write A=A′∪{s0} with A′ having n−1 elements and let G:=FA′⊆FA be the subsheaf generated by the sections over the domains of A′. Let Q:=FA/G be the cokernel sheaf of the inclusion, so that by [F9] there is a short exact sequence 0→G→FA→Q→0; by [F5] its long exact sequence contains the exact portion Hq(X,G)→Hq(X,FA)→Hq(X,Q) for every q. If Hq(X,G)=0 and Hq(X,Q)=0 for all q>d, then Hq(X,FA)=0 for all q>d: the image of the first map is 0, so the second map is injective and its target is 0. Thus, by induction on n, the vanishing for all finitely generated FA follows once it is proved for subsheaves generated by a single section over a compact open subset; the case n=0 is F∅=0 by [F4]. [F4, F5, F9, given]

F4F5F9
2.1

By [step 1.1] and the second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma [F2], Hq(X,F)≅colim⁡AHq(X,FA) for every q≥0. Consequently it suffices to prove Hq(X,FA)=0 for every finite A⊆S and every q>d: then the colimit on the right is a filtered colimit of zero groups, as each Hq(X,FA) vanishes and the transition maps are the induced maps on cohomology, and the group Hq(X,F) is therefore zero. [F2, step 1.1, given]

F2step 1.1
2.2

It remains to treat a subsheaf of F generated by one section s∈F(U) over a compact open U⊆X, which by [step 1.2] is the missing input for the induction; note that Q in [step 1.2] is of this form, being generated by the image of s0. Consider the morphism ψ:jU!ZU⟶F corresponding under [F6] and [F7] to the element s∈F(U)=Hom⁡U(ZU,F∣U); its adjoint transpose carries the canonical section 1∈ZU(U) to s, and its image is a subsheaf of F containing s, so by the minimality half of [F4] the image contains the subsheaf generated by s, which is FA. Conversely, each image germ at x∈U is an integer multiple of sx, while at x∉U the source stalk vanishes; the stalk description [F4] therefore places every image section in FA. Thus the image is exactly FA, and the induced map jU!ZU→FA is an epimorphism, K:=ker⁡ψ is a subsheaf of jU!ZU (Subsheaves), and [F9] gives a short exact sequence 0→K→jU!ZU→FA→0. [F4, F6, F7, F9, step 1.2, given]

F4F6F7F9step 1.2
3.1

The identification of the constant sheaves ZU=ZX∣U [F7] makes the adjoint of the identity a monomorphism jU!ZU↣ZX whose image is the subsheaf of sections of ZX supported in U, so the subsheaf K of [step 2.2] is a subsheaf of ZX, and the same holds for every subsheaf of K.

F7step 2.2
4.1

Apply the construction of [step 1.1] with F replaced by K: the disjoint union SK of the sets K(V) over the compact open subsets V⊆X is a set, and for finite B⊆SK the subsheaf KB⊆K generated by the sections in B is generated by finitely many sections over compact opens and is a subsheaf of ZX by [step 3.1]; the same argument as in [step 1.1] shows that the canonical morphism colim⁡BKB→K is an isomorphism of sheaves, since for every open W the map colim⁡BKB(W)→K(W) is injective by the subset inclusions and surjective because W is compact [F8] and every section of K(W) lies in the subsheaf it generates [F4]. By [F1] the sheaves KB form a small filtered diagram with colimit K.

F1F4F8step 1.1step 3.1
5.1

Let B⊆SK be finite and let KB⊆ZX be as in [step 4.1]. By [F3] there are N≥0 and a chain of subsheaves 0=F0⊆F1⊆⋯⊆FN=KB of ZX such that for each 1≤n≤N there are compact open subsets V⊆W⊆X with a short exact sequence 0→jV!ZV→jW!ZW→Fn/Fn−1→0. We prove Hp(X,KB)=0 for every p>d by induction on n. For n=0 this is Hp(X,0)=0. For the induction step, [F9] and [F5] give the exact portion Hp(X,Fn−1)→Hp(X,Fn)→Hp(X,Fn/Fn−1) and the last group vanishes for p>d: applying [F5] to the short exact sequence of the previous display gives the exact portion Hp(X,jW!ZW)→Hp(X,Fn/Fn−1)→Hp+1(X,jV!ZV), in which the outer groups vanish for p>d by the hypothesis of the statement, so Hp(X,Fn/Fn−1)=0 for p>d. With Hp(X,Fn−1)=0 for p>d as the induction hypothesis, the first exact portion shows that Hp(X,Fn)=0 for p>d. Hence Hp(X,KB)=0 for all p>d and all finite B. [F3, F5, F9, given]

F3F5F9
6.1

By [step 4.1] and the second assertion of the filtered-colimit lemma [F2], applied to the diagram B↦KB with colimit K, Hp(X,K)≅colim⁡BHp(X,KB) for every p≥0; by [step 5.1] every group in this colimit is zero for p>d, so Hp(X,K)=0 for every p>d.

F2step 4.1step 5.1
7.1

In the short exact sequence 0→K→jU!ZU→FA→0 of [step 2.2], the long exact sequence [F5] contains the exact portion Hp(X,jU!ZU)→Hp(X,FA)→Hp+1(X,K) for every p. For p>d the first group vanishes by the hypothesis of the statement, since U is open, and the last group vanishes by [step 6.1] because p+1>d; hence Hp(X,FA)=0 for every p>d. [F5, step 6.1, step 2.2, given]

F5step 6.1step 2.2
8.1

Combining the steps: for every finite A⊆S the sheaf FA is generated by finitely many sections over compact opens, the induction of [step 1.2] reduces its vanishing to the case of one generator, which is [step 7.1], so Hq(X,FA)=0 for every q>d and every finite A; then [step 2.1] identifies Hq(X,F) with the filtered colimit of these zero groups for every q>d, which is zero. The proof is complete. The Axiom of Choice is used exactly through the vanishing theorem [F2] and the exactness statements [F1] that rest on derived global sections and injective resolutions, whose construction needs the Axiom of Dependent Choice [F10] supplied by AC. ∎

F1F2F10step 1.2step 7.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources