How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves
Statement
Let be a presheaf on a topological space , let be its sheafification map, and let be a sheaf on . Then every morphism of presheaves factors uniquely through : there is a unique morphism of sheaves such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A presheaf , a sheaf , and a morphism .
Sheafification is the double plus construction with unit (Sheafification of a presheaf).
The first plus construction is separated (The first plus construction is separated and preserves stalks).
The second plus construction is a sheaf (The second plus construction is a sheaf).
Proof
Let be represented by sections on an open cover . The sections have equal germs on overlaps because the do. Since is a sheaf, they glue uniquely to a section . This is independent of the chosen presentation because equivalent presentations have the same germs at every point, and a sheaf is separated. Thus extends uniquely to a morphism .
Apply the same construction again to the morphism . Because is already a sheaf, this yields a morphism whose restriction along the second unit map is . Composing with the first unit map gives .
To prove uniqueness, let satisfy . Fix an open set and a section . By [F1], is represented locally by sections of , and each such local -section is itself locally represented by sections of . Therefore admits an open cover and sections such that for every . On each the hypothesis gives Since is a sheaf, locality forces . Thus .
Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove that every morphism factors uniquely through . This is the stated adjoint universal property.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces, Section 17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, Class 3, Section 4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)