Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves

Statement

Let F be a presheaf on a topological space X, let ηF:FaF be its sheafification map, and let G be a sheaf on X. Then every morphism of presheaves φ:FG factors uniquely through ηF: there is a unique morphism of sheaves φ:aFG such that φ=φηF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A presheaf F, a sheaf G, and a morphism φ:FG.

[F1]

Sheafification is the double plus construction with unit ηF:FaF (Sheafification of a presheaf).

[L1]

The first plus construction is separated (The first plus construction is separated and preserves stalks).

[L2]

The second plus construction is a sheaf (The second plus construction is a sheaf).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let σF+(U) be represented by sections siF(Ui) on an open cover U=iUi. The sections φUi(si)G(Ui) have equal germs on overlaps because the si do. Since G is a sheaf, they glue uniquely to a section φU+(σ)G(U). This is independent of the chosen presentation because equivalent presentations have the same germs at every point, and a sheaf is separated. Thus φ extends uniquely to a morphism φ+:F+G.

F1L1L2givenconstruct
2.1

Apply the same construction again to the morphism φ+:F+G. Because G is already a sheaf, this yields a morphism φ:(F+)+=aFG whose restriction along the second unit map is φ+. Composing with the first unit map gives φηF=φ.

F1step 1.1construct
3.1

To prove uniqueness, let ψ,ψ:aFG satisfy ψηF=ψηF. Fix an open set U and a section σaF(U). By [F1], σ is represented locally by sections of F+, and each such local F+-section is itself locally represented by sections of F. Therefore U admits an open cover {Ui} and sections siF(Ui) such that σUi=ηF,Ui(si) for every i. On each Ui the hypothesis gives ψU(σ)Ui=ψUi(ηF,Ui(si))=ψUi(ηF,Ui(si))=ψU(σ)Ui. Since G is a sheaf, locality forces ψU(σ)=ψU(σ). Thus ψ=ψ.

F1L2step 2.1
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove that every morphism FG factors uniquely through ηF. This is the stated adjoint universal property.

F1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources