How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cartier divisor local equation equivalence
Statement
Let be a scheme with sheaf of meromorphic functions and injective structure map (Sheaf total quotient rings), and let be the quotient sheaf of Cartier divisors (Cartier divisor).
Call a local-equation datum on a family , where is an open cover of and satisfies for all . Then:
- every local-equation datum determines a section whose restriction to is the class of ;
- every section is induced by a local-equation datum;
- if two local-equation data induce the same , then, after passing to a common refinement and choosing indices with , there exist units with .
In particular the sections of are exactly the local-equation data modulo refinement of the cover and multiplication of the equations by local units.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A scheme with meromorphic sheaf , the injective structure map , and the quotient sheaf of Cartier divisor.
The quotient sheaf is defined as the sheafification of the presheaf ; local equations whose ratios are units glue to a global section (Cartier divisor).
For a morphism of sheaves of abelian groups, the cokernel sheaf is the sheafification of the cokernel presheaf, and the kernel sheaf is the objectwise kernel (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).
Sheafification preserves stalks (Sheafification preserves stalks).
Every element of a presheaf stalk is represented by a section on a neighbourhood of the point (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
The kernel of a quotient group homomorphism is the subgroup being quotiented by (The quotient group and coset product ).
The structure map is injective on every stalk, as proved in step 2.1 of Sheaf total quotient rings. Hence embeds in .
A morphism of sheaves whose stalk maps are bijections is an isomorphism (A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk).
Two germs at a point are equal exactly when the representatives agree on a common neighbourhood (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
Sections of a sheaf that agree on the members of an open cover glue uniquely (A sheaf on a topological space).
A morphism of sheaves of abelian groups is surjective if and only if it is surjective on stalks, and surjectivity on a stalk is witnessed by sections over a neighbourhood (Sheafification of a presheaf, The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
Proof
The quotient sheaf is the cokernel of the map of sheaves . Indeed the cokernel sheaf is the sheafification of , which is exactly the quotient presheaf of [F1].
At every point one has . Let , so by [F1]. The map from to sends the class of a germ represented by to the germ of the sheafified class of . It is surjective: [F3] identifies with , and by [F4] every element of is represented by a quotient class on a neighbourhood of . To see injectivity, suppose the class of maps to the identity germ. By [F3] and [F8], after shrinking to a neighbourhood of , the quotient class is the identity class in . By [F5] this means is a section of , so belongs to . Conversely every germ from maps to the identity. The subgroup embeds in by [F6], giving the claimed quotient.
The quotient map has kernel exactly . For each the map is the quotient map by step 1.2, so its kernel is . The kernel subsheaf of therefore has the same stalks as , and the inclusion of subsheaves is an isomorphism by the stalkwise criterion.
Every section of is locally a class of a meromorphic unit. Let and . Because is a cokernel projection it is surjective on stalks, so the germ is the image of some element of ; that element is represented by a section of over an open neighbourhood of , and and have equal germs at , hence agree on some neighbourhood of contained in .
Every local-equation datum determines a global section of . On the ratio is a unit, so and have equal restriction because their difference is the class of a unit, which vanishes in the quotient. The sections therefore agree on all overlaps and glue by the sheaf axiom to a section with .
Every section of is induced by a local-equation datum. Let and take the set of all pairs with open, , and . By step 3.1, the opens in these pairs cover . For any two such pairs and , the equality of their images with the restrictions of gives on . By step 2.1, is a unit there. Thus this entire indexed family is a local-equation datum; no lift is selected separately for each point.
Two data inducing the same section differ by local units. Let and induce the same . The nonempty intersections form a common refinement. On each such , the classes of and agree, so lies in the kernel of , that is, in . Thus for the unit , and every unit multiple arises this way from another datum.
The sections of are exactly the local-equation data modulo refinement and local units.
The proof uses no choice principle: in step 4.1 it uses the set of all local lifts, and in step 4.2 it uses all pairwise intersections of the two covers.
Depends on
- Cartier divisor
- Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified
- The quotient group $G/N$ and coset product $(gN)(hN)=ghN$
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Sheaf total quotient rings
- Sheafification of a presheaf
- The stalk of a presheaf at a point
- A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk
- Sheafification preserves stalks
- Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, §§31.14–31.30 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, Ch. 15 §§15.1–15.3 (standard reference, not scraped)