Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inverse image is left adjoint to direct image on sheaves

Statement

Let f:X→Y be a continuous map, let G be a sheaf on Y, and let F be a sheaf on X. Then there is a natural bijection Hom⁡X(f−1G,F)≅Hom⁡Y(G,f∗F).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous map f:X→Y, a sheaf G on Y, and a sheaf F on X.

[F1]

The direct image satisfies (f∗F)(V)=F(f−1(V)) (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map).

[F2]

The inverse image is the sheafification of the neighbourhood-colimit presheaf fpG (Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf).

[L1]

A morphism from a presheaf to a sheaf factors uniquely through the sheafification (Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2L1given

Let α:f−1G→F be a sheaf morphism. By [F2] and [L1], α corresponds uniquely to a presheaf morphism α~:fpG→F.

1.2F1F2givenconstruct

Conversely, let β:G→f∗F be a sheaf morphism. For an open U⊆X, represent an element of (fpG)(U) by a pair (V,s) with f(U)⊆V and s∈G(V), and define β~U([V,s]):=βV(s)∣U∈F(U), where the restriction is taken from F(f−1(V)) to F(U). If (V,s) and (V′,s′) represent the same colimit class, then on some smaller open neighbourhood W⊆V∩V′ of f(U) one has s∣W=s′∣W, so βV(s)∣U=βV′(s′)∣U. Thus β~ is well defined and natural in U.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

For an open set V⊆Y and a section s∈G(V), let [V,s] denote its class in (fpG)(f−1(V)), and define βV(s):=α~f−1(V)([V,s])∈F(f−1(V))=(f∗F)(V). If V′⊆V, naturality of α~ shows βV′(s∣V′)=βV(s)∣V′, so the βV define a morphism β:G→f∗F.

2.2F2L1step 1.2construct

By [F2] and [L1], the presheaf morphism β~:fpG→F factors uniquely through a sheaf morphism α:f−1G→F.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

The constructions of steps 2.1 and 2.2 are inverse, because both are recovered from the same formula on representative classes [V,s]. Therefore Hom⁡X(f−1G,F)≅Hom⁡Y(G,f∗F) naturally in both sheaves.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources