Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Inverse image is left adjoint to direct image on sheaves

Statement

Let f:XY be a continuous map, let G be a sheaf on Y, and let F be a sheaf on X. Then there is a natural bijection HomX(f1G,F)HomY(G,fF).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous map f:XY, a sheaf G on Y, and a sheaf F on X.

[F1]

The direct image satisfies (fF)(V)=F(f1(V)) (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map).

[F2]

The inverse image is the sheafification of the neighbourhood-colimit presheaf fpG (Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf).

[L1]

A morphism from a presheaf to a sheaf factors uniquely through the sheafification (Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let α:f1GF be a sheaf morphism. By [F2] and [L1], α corresponds uniquely to a presheaf morphism α~:fpGF.

F2L1given
1.2

Conversely, let β:GfF be a sheaf morphism. For an open UX, represent an element of (fpG)(U) by a pair (V,s) with f(U)V and sG(V), and define β~U([V,s]):=βV(s)UF(U), where the restriction is taken from F(f1(V)) to F(U). If (V,s) and (V,s) represent the same colimit class, then on some smaller open neighbourhood WVV of f(U) one has sW=sW, so βV(s)U=βV(s)U. Thus β~ is well defined and natural in U.

F1F2givenconstruct
2.1

For an open set VY and a section sG(V), let [V,s] denote its class in (fpG)(f1(V)), and define βV(s):=α~f1(V)([V,s])F(f1(V))=(fF)(V). If VV, naturality of α~ shows βV(sV)=βV(s)V, so the βV define a morphism β:GfF.

F1F2step 1.1construct
2.2

By [F2] and [L1], the presheaf morphism β~:fpGF factors uniquely through a sheaf morphism α:f1GF.

F2L1step 1.2construct
3.1

The constructions of steps 2.1 and 2.2 are inverse, because both are recovered from the same formula on representative classes [V,s]. Therefore HomX(f1G,F)HomY(G,fF) naturally in both sheaves.

step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources