How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morphisms from the constant sheaf are global sections
Statement
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison). Let be the constant presheaf with value , let be its sheafification with sheafification map , and put where (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions, Sheafification of a presheaf). For an abelian sheaf on let be the abelian group of morphisms of sheaves of abelian groups, with addition computed componentwise (Global sections of an abelian sheaf, Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories). Then:
-
(Sections as morphisms.) For every abelian sheaf the map is a bijection. Its inverse sends to the unique morphism of sheaves with , and that morphism is described as follows: for every open , every locally constant and every one has the pair being the identification of clause 2 of The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions.
-
(Additivity and naturality.) is a homomorphism of abelian groups for every , hence an isomorphism, and for every morphism of abelian sheaves one has for all ; thus the bijections are natural in .
-
(Complexes.) If is a cochain complex of abelian sheaves (Cochain complex in an abelian category) and is read as the stalk complex concentrated in degree (Zero complex and stalk complex), then the levelwise maps define an isomorphism of cochain complexes (Cochain map) where the left-hand complex is the cochain Hom complex (Homotopically projective bounded above complex), the right-hand complex has the differentials and entries , and the isomorphism is natural in the complex .
Facts & Assumptions
The constant presheaf has for every open , with all restriction maps the identity, and the constant sheaf is , its sheafification (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).
There is a canonical isomorphism of sheaves of sets to the sheaf of locally constant -valued functions such that is the constant function with value ; in particular is a bijection for every open and is the constant function . Clause 3 of the same lemma equips with its abelian-sheaf structure and makes and group homomorphisms (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).
The sheafification map is the canonical morphism of the plus construction, and (Sheafification of a presheaf).
A morphism of presheaves is a family of maps with for all and all (Morphisms of presheaves).
For an open cover , sections with for all glue to a section with , and such is unique by locality (A sheaf on a topological space).
Restriction is written for and , and , for (Sections, restrictions, and global sections of a presheaf).
A presheaf of groups has every a group with every restriction map a group homomorphism (Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules).
is the category of sheaves of abelian groups on , and a morphism of sheaves is a family of group homomorphisms commuting with restriction; addition of morphisms is componentwise (Global sections of an abelian sheaf).
The category of sheaves of abelian groups on is an abelian category (Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories).
Every morphism of presheaves into a sheaf factors uniquely as with a morphism of sheaves (Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves).
The stalk complex has in degree , zero elsewhere, and every differential zero; it is concentrated in degree (Zero complex and stalk complex).
For cochain complexes the Hom complex has and ; the upper indices are read through the reindexing convention under which a cochain complex has chain complex (Homotopically projective bounded above complex, Cochain complex in an abelian category).
A cochain map is a family with for every (Cochain map).
Proof
Given: A topological space , the constant presheaf with sheafification , the global section , an abelian sheaf and its global section for an arbitrary morphism .
For every presheaf of abelian groups on the map is a bijection, where denotes presheaves of abelian groups with morphisms given by families of group homomorphisms commuting with restrictions. Injectivity: for a morphism and an open , additivity of gives for all , and naturality [F4] with the identity restriction maps of [F1] gives [F6], so is determined by . Surjectivity: for the formulas define group homomorphisms that commute with restriction, because for [F6, F7], and . The map is additive because addition of such morphisms is componentwise, so evaluation at preserves sums.
By [F2] there is a canonical isomorphism of sheaves of sets with each a bijection, and the constant function with value ; in particular is the constant function on . As an isomorphism of sheaves commutes with restrictions, so a section of over is a locally constant function and for the preimage is open, the sets , , forming a pairwise disjoint open cover of .
Fix a global section and an open with a locally constant . For set ; since the open sets are pairwise disjoint [step 1.2], the compatibility holds for all , for both sides being sections over the empty open set, and for being the same section, and [F5] provides a unique section with for every . This defines for every open .
The maps of [step 2.1] are group homomorphisms and commute with restriction, so they define a morphism of sheaves with . Additivity: for locally constant the sections and have the same restriction to each , namely , using that restriction is a group homomorphism [F7] and the defining property of [step 2.1], so locality [F5] gives . Naturality: for and locally constant , the restriction is locally constant with , and both and restrict to [F6, F7], so locality gives [F4, F5]. Finally because is the constant function [step 1.2], whose level set in degree is all of and whose level sets in degrees are empty.
By [step 3.1] every equals for some morphism ; hence is surjective.
Let be a morphism and put . For every open and every the section is the constant function on [step 1.2, F3], so naturality of [F4] and additivity of give , because [F6]; the same value is obtained from the morphism of [step 3.1] by its defining property [step 2.1]. Hence , and the uniqueness part of [F10] forces . Thus is injective with inverse . Moreover the computation displayed in clause 1 follows from naturality and additivity of [F8] applied to , the constant function over [step 1.2], and agrees with the description of in [step 2.1].
The map is additive: for morphisms the identity of componentwise addition [F8] gives . Together with [step 4.1] and [step 4.2] this makes an isomorphism of abelian groups. Naturality: for a morphism of abelian sheaves and one has by componentwise composition of families [F8].
Let be a cochain complex of abelian sheaves and read as the stalk complex concentrated in degree [F11]. In the cochain Hom complex the -th entry is [F12], and since for [F11] this entry is , with differential and [F11, F12], that is, . Transporting along the bijections of [step 5.1] sends to , and naturality of [step 5.1] turns composition with into the map , so the levelwise maps define a cochain map [F13] that is bijective in every degree, hence an isomorphism of cochain complexes, natural in because each is.
Clause 1 is [step 4.1] together with [step 4.2], the description of the inverse being the one constructed in [step 2.1] and verified in [step 3.1] and [step 4.2]; clause 2 is [step 5.1]; clause 3 is [step 6.1]. No choice principle is used anywhere. ∎
Depends on
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions
- Sheafification of a presheaf
- A presheaf on a topological space
- Morphisms of presheaves
- Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Sections, restrictions, and global sections of a presheaf
- Global sections of an abelian sheaf
- Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories
- Sheafification is left adjoint to the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves
- Zero complex and stalk complex
- Cochain complex in an abelian category
- Cochain map
- Homotopically projective bounded above complex
Used by
- Cup product in sheaf cohomology Definition
- Sheaf cohomology classes as derived morphisms Lemma
- Cup-product laws Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)