How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sections, restrictions, and global sections of a presheaf
Definition
Let be a presheaf on a topological space .
An element of is called a section of over . We also write
If and , its restriction to is
A global section of is a section over the whole space:
The presheaf identities imply
Depends on
Used by
- Refinement choices differ on cochains but not on cohomology Counterexample
- Affine-overlap separation condition Definition
- c-soft sheaves Definition
- Cech cohomology of holomorphic sections of a line bundle on finite good covers Definition
- Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors Definition
- Flasque sheaf Definition
- Germs of sections Definition
- Global sections of an abelian sheaf Definition
- Linear systems, base loci, and general members Definition
- Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover Definition
- Refinement map of ordered open covers Definition
- A skyscraper sheaf is flasque and acyclic Example
- Three-open Čech sign cancellation Example
- A section of an invertible sheaf has a canonical zero subscheme Lemma
- Čech H0 equals global sections Lemma
- Constant sheaves on irreducible spaces are flasque and acyclic Lemma
- Extensions of line bundles on the projective line split after ordering Lemma
- Global sections are left exact but need not preserve epimorphisms Lemma
- Morphisms from the constant sheaf are global sections Lemma
- Ordered and alternating Čech complexes agree Lemma
- The Čech differential squares to zero Lemma
- Refinement choices induce the same Čech map Theorem
- The sheaf axiom is the equalizer condition on a cover Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)