Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Three-open Čech sign cancellation

Example

Let X be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), let F be a sheaf of abelian groups on X, and let U=(U0,U1,U2) be an open cover of X indexed by the three-element linearly ordered set {0<1<2}, with ordered Čech cochains C∙(U,F) (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover). Write Uij:=Ui∩Uj and U012:=U0∩U1∩U2. Then C0=F(U0)⊕F(U1)⊕F(U2),C1=F(U01)⊕F(U02)⊕F(U12),C2=F(U012),Cp=0 (p≥3), the differentials are δ0(s0,s1,s2)=(s1∣U01−s0∣U01, s2∣U02−s0∣U02, s2∣U12−s1∣U12), acting componentwise on the three direct summands of C1, and δ1(c01,c02,c12)=c12∣U012−c02∣U012+c01∣U012∈F(U012), while δp=0 for p≥2. For every 0-cochain s=(s0,s1,s2) the two differentials compose to zero by term-by-term cancellation, (δ1(δ0s))012=(s2−s1)∣U012−(s2−s0)∣U012+(s1−s0)∣U012=0, each of s0,s1,s2 occurring twice with opposite signs; consequently Hˇ2(U,F)=F(U012)/im⁡δ1, and the identity is the p=0 case of δp+1∘δp=0 (The Čech differential squares to zero).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The ordered p-cochains are Cp(U,F)=∏i0<⋯<ipF(Ui0∩⋯∩Uip), and the differential is (δps)i0⋯ip+1=∑j=0p+1(−1)jsi0⋯ij^⋯ip+1∣Ui0∩⋯∩Uip+1 (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover).

[F2]

For every p one has δp+1∘δp=0, so the cochains form a cochain complex (The Čech differential squares to zero).

[F3]

The Čech cohomology of the fixed cover is Hˇp(U,F)=ker⁡δp/im⁡δp−1 (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology).

[F4]

For a sheaf of sets the group F(∅) is a singleton, so for a sheaf of abelian groups the sections over an empty intersection form the zero group (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set).

Verification

Given: A topological space X, a sheaf of abelian groups F on X, the open cover U=(U0,U1,U2) indexed by {0<1<2} and a 0-cochain s=(s0,s1,s2)∈F(U0)⊕F(U1)⊕F(U2).

Proof technique: direct.

1.1

The increasing tuples of the linearly ordered set {0<1<2} are the three singletons (0),(1),(2) in degree 0, the three pairs (0,1),(0,2),(1,2) in degree 1, the triple (0,1,2) in degree 2, and no increasing (p+1)-tuples for p≥3. Evaluating the product formula of [F1] on these tuples gives the four groups displayed in the statement, the product over an empty set of tuples being the zero group.

F1F4
2.1

For s=(s0,s1,s2)∈C0 and the pair (0,1) the formula of [F1] reads (δ0s)01=∑j=01(−1)js0⋯j^⋯1=s1∣U01−s0∣U01, and the same computation for the pairs (0,2) and (1,2) gives (δ0s)02=s2∣U02−s0∣U02 and (δ0s)12=s2∣U12−s1∣U12, that is, the three components of δ0 displayed in the statement with the signs +,− attached to the second and first index respectively. For c=(c01,c02,c12)∈C1 and the triple (0,1,2) the formula reads (δ1c)012=∑j=02(−1)jc0⋯j^⋯2=c12∣U012−c02∣U012+c01∣U012, the alternating signs +,−,+ attaching to the omission of j=0,1,2. Since C3=0 by [step 1.1], the differential δ2 and all higher differentials are the zero maps, since their targets are zero.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Composing the two computations of [step 2.1] gives (δ1(δ0s))012=(s2−s1)∣U012−(s2−s0)∣U012+(s1−s0)∣U012, all three terms lying in F(U012), the restrictions of the three components of δ0s to the triple intersection. Expanding, the terms s2,s1 and s0 each occur twice, once with each sign: s2−s2=0, −s1+s1=0 and +s0−s0=0 after collecting, so the sum is 0 for every 0-cochain s. This is the cancellation announced in the statement and the case p=0 of the general identity [F2].

F2step 2.1
4.1

The displayed groups of [step 1.1] and differentials of [step 2.1] are those of the ordered Čech complex of the three-open cover, and [step 3.1] verifies δ1∘δ0=0 explicitly, in agreement with the general theorem [F2]; the vanishing of δ2 and of all higher differentials is [step 2.1], so all the remaining composites are zero as well and the cochain groups indeed form a complex. Applying the definition of fixed-cover cohomology [F3] in degree two, where δ2=0 and δ1 is displayed in [step 2.1], gives Hˇ2(U,F)=ker⁡δ2/im⁡δ1=F(U012)/im⁡δ1, and the groups in degrees zero and one are Hˇ0=ker⁡δ0 and Hˇ1=ker⁡δ1/im⁡δ0. No choice principle is used: the tuples are finite and enumerated, the complex is finite and the cancellation is a finite computation in the abelian group F(U012). ∎

F3step 3.1step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources