How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Three-open Čech sign cancellation
Example
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), let be a sheaf of abelian groups on , and let be an open cover of indexed by the three-element linearly ordered set , with ordered Čech cochains (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover). Write and . Then the differentials are acting componentwise on the three direct summands of , and while for . For every -cochain the two differentials compose to zero by term-by-term cancellation, each of occurring twice with opposite signs; consequently , and the identity is the case of (The Čech differential squares to zero).
Facts & Assumptions
The ordered -cochains are , and the differential is (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover).
For every one has , so the cochains form a cochain complex (The Čech differential squares to zero).
The Čech cohomology of the fixed cover is (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology).
For a sheaf of sets the group is a singleton, so for a sheaf of abelian groups the sections over an empty intersection form the zero group (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set).
Verification
Given: A topological space , a sheaf of abelian groups on , the open cover indexed by and a -cochain .
Proof technique: direct.
The increasing tuples of the linearly ordered set are the three singletons in degree , the three pairs in degree , the triple in degree , and no increasing -tuples for . Evaluating the product formula of [F1] on these tuples gives the four groups displayed in the statement, the product over an empty set of tuples being the zero group.
For and the pair the formula of [F1] reads , and the same computation for the pairs and gives and , that is, the three components of displayed in the statement with the signs attached to the second and first index respectively. For and the triple the formula reads , the alternating signs attaching to the omission of . Since by [step 1.1], the differential and all higher differentials are the zero maps, since their targets are zero.
Composing the two computations of [step 2.1] gives , all three terms lying in , the restrictions of the three components of to the triple intersection. Expanding, the terms and each occur twice, once with each sign: , and after collecting, so the sum is for every -cochain . This is the cancellation announced in the statement and the case of the general identity [F2].
The displayed groups of [step 1.1] and differentials of [step 2.1] are those of the ordered Čech complex of the three-open cover, and [step 3.1] verifies explicitly, in agreement with the general theorem [F2]; the vanishing of and of all higher differentials is [step 2.1], so all the remaining composites are zero as well and the cochain groups indeed form a complex. Applying the definition of fixed-cover cohomology [F3] in degree two, where and is displayed in [step 2.1], gives , and the groups in degrees zero and one are and . No choice principle is used: the tuples are finite and enumerated, the complex is finite and the cancellation is a finite computation in the abelian group . ∎
Depends on
- Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover
- The Čech differential squares to zero
- Fixed-cover Čech cohomology
- A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Sections, restrictions, and global sections of a presheaf
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiahui Gao and Shuwu Zhang, Lectures on Algebraic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)