How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global sections are left exact but need not preserve epimorphisms
Statement
Let be a topological space. If
is exact in sheaves of abelian groups on , then
is exact. However, there exists an epimorphism of sheaves of abelian groups on some space whose induced map on global sections is not surjective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological space .
Global sections are sections over the whole space: (Sections, restrictions, and global sections of a presheaf).
Kernel sheaves are computed objectwise (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).
Exactness of sheaves means image equals kernel at each interior term (Exact sequences of sheaves).
Proof
Suppose is exact. By [L1], the kernel of the map is the section group of the kernel sheaf at . By [L2], that kernel sheaf is the image of , so its sections over are exactly the image of . Together with [F1], this is the displayed left exactness.
For the failure of surjectivity, let , let be the sheaf of continuous real-valued functions on , and let be the subsheaf of locally constant integer-valued functions. Let be the quotient sheaf obtained by sheafifying the presheaf . Every germ of a section of is represented locally by a continuous real-valued function, so the canonical map is locally surjective and hence an epimorphism of sheaves.
Cover the circle by the arcs and . Choose continuous angle functions and with . On one connected component of the difference is , and on the other it is , so the classes of and agree in the quotient presheaf and glue to a global section . If had a lift , then would be an integer-valued continuous function on the connected arc , hence a constant . On the two components of this would force to be both and , a contradiction. Thus is not surjective.
Step 1.1 gives left exactness, and step 1.3 gives an epimorphism whose global sections map is not surjective.
Depends on
Used by
- Global sections need not preserve surjections Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 17.3 and Section 6.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, Exercise 2.6.F (standard reference, not scraped)