How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves
Statement
Let be the inclusion of an open subspace.
- For every sheaf of abelian groups on and every sheaf of abelian groups on , there is a natural bijection
- The functor is exact on sheaves of abelian groups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open inclusion .
Restriction to is the inverse image sheaf (Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace).
A section of over an open is a section of whose support is closed in (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace).
Exactness of abelian sheaf sequences can be tested stalkwise (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).
Proof
Let be a morphism on . If is open, then [F2] gives , so the components define a morphism on .
Conversely, let be a morphism on . For an open set and a section , use to obtain a section on . For each point , the support condition in [F2] gives an open neighbourhood with , so we may assign the zero section of on . These local sections agree on overlaps, so they glue uniquely to a section of . This defines a morphism .
Let . If , then the neighbourhoods of that lie inside are cofinal among all neighbourhoods of , so . If and for some neighbourhood of , then [F2] gives an open neighbourhood with , so the germ of at is zero. Therefore .
The constructions in steps 1.1 and 1.2 are inverse, because on opens contained in they both recover the original morphism on , and outside the support condition forces the extension to vanish locally. Therefore is left adjoint to .
Apply step 1.3 to a short exact sequence on . At points of the stalk sequence after is the original exact stalk sequence, and outside it is . Hence [L1] implies that preserves exact sequences.
Depends on
Used by
- Point operations and the open closed constructible line Example
- Abelian sheaves form a Grothendieck category Lemma
- Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves Lemma
- Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings Lemma
- Complex algebraic constructible complexes have finite conical cochain models Lemma
- Derived adjunction for finite rings and closed immersions Lemma
- Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves Lemma
- Enough injective sheaves of modules Lemma
- Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence Lemma
- Extension-by-zero generators detect sheaf-cohomology vanishing Lemma
- Finite filtration of a generated subsheaf of the constant integer sheaf Lemma
- Finite simplicial constructible sheaves have an actual derived incidence model Lemma
- Geometric Gauss-Manin Hodge variations and integral lattices Lemma
- Global sections on module sheaves have ordinary sheaf cohomology as derived functors Lemma
- Injective abelian sheaves are flasque Lemma
- Injective modules are flasque and Ext from the structure sheaf is cohomology Lemma
- Koszul sheaf Ext of a smooth regular immersion is concentrated in codimension Lemma
- Local-to-global Ext collapse for a regular immersion Lemma
- Locally contractible metric spaces have singular constant sheaf cohomology Lemma
- Locally split Cech nerves give actual derived Cartesian sheaf descent Lemma
- Support localization, base change, projection and trace calculus Lemma
- Cohomology of a finite disjoint union Theorem
- Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation Theorem
- Exceptional inverse image as the adjoint of derived proper-support image Theorem
- Grothendieck vanishing on a Noetherian space Theorem
- Mayer–Vietoris sequence for sheaf cohomology Theorem
- Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, Sections 2.7.D and 2.7.F (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 6.31 (standard reference, not scraped)