Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pullback of modules is right exact, and flat stalk maps make it exact

Statement

Let

(f,f♯):(X,OX)⟶(Y,OY)

be a morphism of ringed spaces. Then the pullback functor

f∗:Mod⁡(OY)⟶Mod⁡(OX)

is right exact. Moreover, if every stalk ring map

OY,f(x)⟶OX,x

is flat, then f∗ is exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism of ringed spaces (f,f♯):(X,OX)→(Y,OY).

[F1]

The pullback is f∗G=OX⊗f−1OYf−1G (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces).

[F2]

A ring map is flat exactly when tensoring with the target module is exact (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms).

[L1]

The stalk of an inverse image is the stalk over the image point (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point).

[L2]

The stalk of a tensor-product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks).

[L3]

Exactness of sheaf sequences is equivalent to stalkwise exactness (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).

[L4]

Tensoring with a fixed module is right exact (Tensoring is right exact).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3given

Let M′→M→M′′→0 be an exact sequence of OY-modules, and fix x∈X with y=f(x). By [L1], the stalk sequence after applying f−1 is My′⟶My⟶My′′⟶0, which is exact because the original sequence is exact at every stalk. Hence f−1 is exact on the underlying sheaves.

2.1F1L2L3L4step 1.1

By [F1] and [L2], the stalk of the pulled-back sequence at x is OX,x⊗OY,yMy′⟶OX,x⊗OY,yMy⟶OX,x⊗OY,yMy′′⟶0. Step 1.1 gives exactness before tensoring, so [L4] makes this sequence right exact. Since this holds for every x, [L3] shows that f∗ is right exact.

3.1F2L3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Assume every stalk ring map OY,f(x)→OX,x is flat. By [F2], for each x∈X the functor OX,x⊗OY,f(x)− is exact on OY,f(x)-modules. Applying this to the exact stalk sequence from step 1.1 shows that the sequence in step 2.1 is exact at every x. Therefore [L3] implies that f∗ is exact.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources