Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Pullback of modules is right exact, and flat stalk maps make it exact

Statement

Let

(f,f):(X,OX)(Y,OY)

be a morphism of ringed spaces. Then the pullback functor

f:Mod(OY)Mod(OX)

is right exact. Moreover, if every stalk ring map

OY,f(x)OX,x

is flat, then f is exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism of ringed spaces (f,f):(X,OX)(Y,OY).

[F1]

The pullback is fG=OXf1OYf1G (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces).

[F2]

A ring map is flat exactly when tensoring with the target module is exact (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms).

[L1]

The stalk of an inverse image is the stalk over the image point (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point).

[L2]

The stalk of a tensor-product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks).

[L3]

Exactness of sheaf sequences is equivalent to stalkwise exactness (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).

[L4]

Tensoring with a fixed module is right exact (Tensoring is right exact).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let MMM0 be an exact sequence of OY-modules, and fix xX with y=f(x). By [L1], the stalk sequence after applying f1 is MyMyMy0, which is exact because the original sequence is exact at every stalk. Hence f1 is exact on the underlying sheaves.

L1L3given
2.1

By [F1] and [L2], the stalk of the pulled-back sequence at x is OX,xOY,yMyOX,xOY,yMyOX,xOY,yMy0. Step 1.1 gives exactness before tensoring, so [L4] makes this sequence right exact. Since this holds for every x, [L3] shows that f is right exact.

F1L2L3L4step 1.1
3.1

Assume every stalk ring map OY,f(x)OX,x is flat. By [F2], for each xX the functor OX,xOY,f(x) is exact on OY,f(x)-modules. Applying this to the exact stalk sequence from step 1.1 shows that the sequence in step 2.1 is exact at every x. Therefore [L3] implies that f is exact.

F2L3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources