Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks

Statement

Let (X,OX) be a ringed space, let F,G be OX-modules, and let xX. Then there is a canonical isomorphism of OX,x-modules (FOXG)xFxOX,xGx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A ringed space (X,OX), two OX-modules F,G, and a point xX.

[F1]

The sheaf tensor product is the sheafification of the presheaf UF(U)OX(U)G(U) (Tensor product of sheaves of modules).

[F2]

Stalks are germs of sections over neighbourhoods of the point (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[L1]

Sheafification preserves stalks (Sheafification preserves stalks).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1] and [L1], it is enough to identify the stalk of the tensor-product presheaf UF(U)OX(U)G(U).

F1L1given
1.2

For every neighbourhood U of x, the germ maps F(U)Fx, G(U)Gx, and OX(U)OX,x induce an OX(U)-balanced pairing into FxOX,xGx. Hence there is a homomorphism F(U)OX(U)G(U)FxOX,xGx, and these maps are compatible with restriction. Therefore they induce a map Φ:(Fp,OXG)xFxOX,xGx.

F2construct
1.3

Conversely, if sxFx and txGx are represented by sections sF(U) and tG(U) on the same neighbourhood U of x, define Ψ(sxtx):=(st)x. If the representatives are changed on a smaller neighbourhood, the represented germ of st is unchanged there, so Ψ is well defined on simple tensors and extends linearly to a homomorphism Ψ:FxOX,xGx(Fp,OXG)x.

F2construct
2.1

On a simple tensor represented on one neighbourhood, Φ and Ψ plainly undo each other. Since both sides are generated by simple tensors, they are inverse isomorphisms. Combining this with step 1.1 gives the stated isomorphism for the sheaf tensor product.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources