Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sheaf cohomology classes as derived morphisms

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a topological space, let Hq(X,−) be sheaf cohomology computed from the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I of Enough injective abelian sheaves (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections), and let ZX be the constant sheaf with value Z (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions). Under the standing smallness or supplied cofinal-denominator hypothesis of Derived category of an abelian category, for every abelian sheaf F on X and every p≥0 there is a canonical isomorphism Hom⁡D(Ab(X))(ZX[−p],F)→ ∼ Hp(X,F), exhibited by the chain Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],F)⟶Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],I∙(F))← Q Hom⁡K(ZX[−p],I∙(F))→ ∼ H0(Hom⁡‾∙(ZX[−p],I∙(F)))→ ∼ Hp(X,F), where the first arrow is composition with Q(ηF) for the coaugmentation ηF:F→I∙(F) of the datum, the second is the localization map Q of Derived category of an abelian category, and the last two identify the full Hom complex with the shift Γ(X,I∙(F))[p], including the negative degrees that supply boundaries in degree zero. Moreover:

  1. (Naturality and additivity.) The isomorphism is additive and natural in F: for every morphism ψ:F→G of abelian sheaves the square Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],F)⟶Hp(X,F)↓∘Q(ψ)↓Hp(X,ψ)Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],G)⟶Hp(X,G) commutes, Hp(X,ψ) being the map induced by Γ(X,ψ) on the cochain maps supplied with the datum (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

  2. (Degree zero.) For p=0 the composite of the isomorphism with the canonical isomorphism H0(X,F)→∼Γ(X,F) of Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections is the bijection φ↦φX(1X) of Morphisms from the constant sheaf are global sections; in particular the identity of ZX corresponds to 1X∈Γ(X,ZX).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Sheaf cohomology is defined by Hq(X,F):=RIqΓ(X,F)=Hq(Γ(X,I∙(F)del)), the cohomology object of the complex Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F))→⋯ obtained from the deleted resolution (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, Deleted resolutions).

[F2]

For a morphism φ:F→G of abelian sheaves the map Hq(X,φ) is the map on cohomology induced by Γ(X,−) applied to the cochain maps supplied with the datum, and it is additive in φ (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

[F3]

Under AC the datum assigns to every abelian sheaf one specific injective resolution, built functorially from F with no further selection (Enough injective abelian sheaves).

[F4]

An injective resolution of A is a coaugmented cochain complex 0→A→ηI0→I1→⋯ that is exact at every displayed term, with every In injective (Injective resolutions in an abelian category); in particular I∙(F) has injective terms, vanishes in negative degrees and the coaugmentation ηF induces isomorphisms on cohomology, so it is a quasi-isomorphism F→I∙(F) (Quasi-isomorphism).

[F5]

A bounded-below cochain complex of injective objects is K-injective, assuming dependent choice for the countable successive homotopy extensions (A bounded below complex of injectives is homotopically injective); in ZF the Axiom of Choice implies dependent choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F6]

For a K-injective complex I and any complex X the localization map Q:Hom⁡K(X,I)→Hom⁡D(X,I) is bijective (Morphisms into a homotopically injective complex need no roof).

[F7]

For complexes C,D there is a natural isomorphism Hom⁡K(A)(C,D)≅H0(Hom⁡‾(C,D)∙), and the cochain category K(A) is the reindexed published homotopy category (Hom in the homotopy category is zero-degree homology of the Hom complex, Derived category of an abelian category).

[F8]

In the cochain Hom complex the degree-r term is ∏nHom⁡(Pn,An+r), with differential (du)n=dAun−(−1)run+1dP, and shifts satisfy X[k]n=Xn+k with dX[k]n=(−1)kdXn+k (Homotopically projective bounded above complex, Derived category of an abelian category).

[F9]

A quasi-isomorphism becomes invertible under Q (The localization functor sends quasi isomorphisms to isomorphisms), and composition in the localization is bilinear (Addition of roofs makes an additive localization).

[F10]

For an abelian sheaf F the map φ↦φX(1X) is a bijection Hom⁡Ab(X)(ZX,F)→Γ(X,F), additive and natural in F, and it extends to cochain complexes: for every cochain complex J∙ of abelian sheaves the levelwise maps define an isomorphism of cochain complexes Hom⁡‾∙(ZX,J∙)≅Γ(X,J∙) with right-hand differentials Γ(X,dn) (Morphisms from the constant sheaf are global sections).

[F11]

The nth cohomology object of a cochain complex is Hn(C)=coker⁡(Bn(C)→Zn(C))=Zn(C)/Bn(C) with Zn(C)=ker⁡(dn) and Bn(C)=im⁡(dn−1), so H0 of a complex is the quotient of the 0-cocycles by the 0-coboundaries (Cohomology object of a cochain complex).

[F12]

For every abelian sheaf F there is a canonical isomorphism H0(X,F)→∼Γ(X,F), natural in F, identifying H0(X,F) with the kernel of Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F)) (Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections).

[F13]

A cochain map f:C∙→D∙ is a family fn:Cn→Dn with dDn∘fn=fn+1∘dCn, and a cochain complex is a family of objects with dn+1dn=0 (Cochain map, Cochain complex in an abelian category).

[F14]

A function f:U→A is locally constant when every point of U has an open neighbourhood on which f is constant, and the constant sheaf's sections over U are exactly these functions under θU (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).

[F15]

A morphism of sheaves is a family of group homomorphisms commuting with restriction, and addition of morphisms is componentwise, so Γ(X,−) is additive (Global sections of an abelian sheaf).

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a topological space X, the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I with its coaugmentations ηF:F→I∙(F) and its functorial cochain maps, an abelian sheaf F and an integer p≥0.

1.1

For every abelian sheaf F the datum gives a coaugmented complex 0→F→I0(F)→I1(F)→⋯ which is exact at every displayed term with every In(F) injective [F3, F4], so read as a map of complexes ηF:F→I∙(F) it is a quasi-isomorphism [F4]; the complex I∙(F) is bounded below with injective terms [F4], hence K-injective by [F5], dependent choice being available from the Axiom of Choice [F5].

F3F4F5
2.1

For every p composition with Q(ηF) is a bijection Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],F)⟶Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],I∙(F)), because Q(ηF) is invertible in D(Ab(X)) [F9] and composition with an isomorphism is bijective.

F9step 1.1
2.2

Since I∙(F) is K-injective [step 1.1], the localization map Q:Hom⁡K(ZX[−p],I∙(F))⟶Hom⁡D(ZX[−p],I∙(F)) is bijective [F6].

F6step 1.1
3.1

The natural isomorphism of [F7], read through the reindexing convention that makes K(Ab(X)) the published homotopy category, identifies the homotopy classes of cochain maps ZX[−p]→I∙(F) with the zeroth cohomology of the cochain Hom complex: Hom⁡K(ZX[−p],I∙(F))≅H0(Hom⁡‾∙(ZX[−p],I∙(F))).

F7step 2.2
4.1

By [F8] the degree-n term of Hom⁡‾∙(ZX[−p],I∙(F)) is ∏mHom⁡((ZX[−p])m,Im+n(F)), and (ZX[−p])m=ZXm−p is nonzero only for m=p, where it is ZX, so the term is Hom⁡(ZX,In+p(F)); its differential is (du)p=dIup−(−1)nup+1dZX[−p]p, and dZX[−p]p=(−1)−pdZX0=0 while up+1=0 because (ZX[−p])p+1=0 [F8], so (du)=dI∘u in every degree. Applying [F10] in every degree identifies this Hom complex with the full graded complex having degree-n term Γ(X,In+p(F)) for all n∈Z (zero when n+p<0), and differential Γ(X,dn+p). The degreewise sign twist u↦(−1)pnu identifies it with the standard shifted complex Γ(X,I∙(F))[p] when that shift uses differential (−1)pd [F13]. In particular degree −1 is retained when p>0 and contributes the boundaries in degree zero.

F8F10F13step 3.1
5.1

Taking zeroth cohomology in [step 4.1] gives the quotient of the 0-cocycles of that complex by the 0-coboundaries [F11], that is ker⁡(Γ(X,dp))/im⁡(Γ(X,dp−1))=Hp(Γ(X,I∙(F)del))=Hp(X,F), the middle expression being Hp of the deleted resolution, whose entries in degrees ≥0 are the In(F) and which has zero differential in negative degrees [F1, F4].

F1F4F11step 4.1
5.2

Let p=0 and let φ:ZX→F be a morphism with φX(1X)=s. Under [step 2.1] φ goes to Q(ηF∘φ), whose preimage under the bijection of [step 2.2] is the homotopy class of the cochain map ηF∘φ:ZX→I∙(F) [step 1.1]; under [step 3.1] and [step 4.1] this class corresponds to the class of the cocycle Γ(X,ηF)(s)=(ηF∘φ)X(1X)∈Γ(X,I0(F)), which is a cocycle because ηF∘φ is a cochain map [F13] and ZX has zero differentials in nonzero degrees [F8]. The canonical isomorphism of [F12] identifies H0(X,F) with the kernel of Γ(X,I0(F))→Γ(X,I1(F)) through exactly this map Γ(X,ηF), so the composite of clause 1 with it sends φ to φX(1X); by [F10] the map φ↦φX(1X) is a bijection onto Γ(X,F), and the constant section 1X is the image of the identity of ZX. The description of ZX(U) by locally constant functions [F14] and the additivity of Γ(X,−) [F15] are the ingredients of [F10] used here.

F8F10F12F13F14F15step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

Composing the bijection of [step 2.1] with the inverse of the bijection of [step 2.2], the isomorphism of [step 3.1] and the equality of [step 5.1] gives the canonical isomorphism of clause 1. Naturality: a morphism ψ:F→G of abelian sheaves comes with the cochain map I(ψ):I∙(F)→I∙(G) supplied by the functorial datum [F3] and commuting with the coaugmentations, so I(ψ)∘ηF=ηG∘ψ; every arrow used in [step 2.1], [step 2.2], [step 3.1], [step 4.1] and [step 5.1] is given by composition with I(ψ) and Γ(X,I(ψ)), and the levelwise bijections ΦJn of [F10] are natural in the sheaf variable, so the square of clause 1 commutes, the right-hand vertical map being Hp(X,ψ) [F2]. Additivity: the bijections of [step 2.1] and [step 2.2] are composition with fixed morphisms and hence additive, the identification of [step 3.1] is an isomorphism of abelian groups, the levelwise maps of [F10] are additive [F10], and H0 is additive, so the composite isomorphism is additive; alternatively additivity of the cup-style constructions follows from bilinearity of composition in the localization [F9].

F2F3F9F10step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1
7.1

Clause 1 is [step 6.1] with [step 5.1], and clause 2 is [step 5.2]. The Axiom of Choice is used only to obtain the functorial injective resolution datum [F3] and, through the Axiom of Dependent Choice [F5], the K-injectivity of the bounded-below injective complexes; no other selection occurs. ∎

F3F5step 6.1step 5.1step 5.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources