How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Grothendieck vanishing on a Noetherian space
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian topological space (Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets) with for an integer (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Then for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every integer , cohomology being that of Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections; in particular the cohomological dimension of relative to the class of all abelian sheaves is at most (Cohomological dimension relative to a sheaf class).
Facts & Assumptions
For a Noetherian space , is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of , and (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention).
Every irreducible component of a space is a closed subset (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
Every irreducible subset of a space is contained in an irreducible component (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
A nonempty irreducible space is its own unique irreducible component (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
If a space is the union of finitely many irreducible closed subsets with no redundant member, then these are exactly its irreducible components (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
If is irreducible and is closed with and , then the closure of in is irreducible (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
The closure of an irreducible subset is irreducible (Existence and basic properties of irreducible components).
A Noetherian space has only finitely many irreducible components (A Noetherian space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is Noetherian with and for every open and every , then for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every (Extension-by-zero generators detect sheaf-cohomology vanishing).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a closed subset with inclusion and a sheaf of abelian groups on one has for all (Pushforward along a closed immersion preserves sheaf cohomology).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is irreducible and is an abelian group, then for every (Constant sheaves on irreducible spaces are flasque and acyclic).
For an open subspace with closed complement and a sheaf of abelian groups on there is a short exact sequence ; for its first term is up to canonical isomorphism (Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence).
If is a sheaf of abelian groups on whose stalks vanish off a closed subset , then the unit is an isomorphism of sheaves of abelian groups (A sheaf with no stalks off a closed subset is a pushforward).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on gives a natural long exact cohomology sequence, independent of the injective resolutions used (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).
Every subspace of a Noetherian space is Noetherian (Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Then is a covariant additive functor on abelian sheaves on , so an isomorphism of sheaves induces an isomorphism of cohomology groups (Variance of sheaf cohomology).
For a sheaf of sets on a topological space, is a singleton (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set).
An exact functor between abelian categories has vanishing positive derived functors relative to any supplied injective resolution datum (An exact functor has vanishing positive derived functors).
The cohomological dimension of relative to a class satisfies if and only if for every and every (Cohomological dimension relative to a sheaf class).
The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the statement (The Axiom of Choice).
In ZF the Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
A topology is closed under finite intersections, so finite unions of closed subsets are closed (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
An irreducible component is an irreducible subset maximal under inclusion, so an irreducible subset strictly containing it cannot exist (Irreducible components of a topological space).
Irreducibility carries a nonemptiness clause (Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology).
if and only if some open with satisfies ; equivalently precisely when for every open (A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set).
The stalk at is the filtered colimit of the section groups over the open neighbourhoods of (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
A section of over an open is a section on which vanishes locally near every point of , and in particular when (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace).
A subset of a subspace is closed in if and only if for a closed (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
The constant sheaf on a space is the sheafification of the constant presheaf with value on (Sheafification of a presheaf).
Proof
Given: A Noetherian topological space with for an integer , the Axiom of Choice of [F21], and an arbitrary sheaf of abelian groups on .
I prove the assertion by induction on . The case , needed as the input for , is the assertion that every Noetherian space with satisfies for every sheaf on and every . If and , the singleton is irreducible [F25], so by [F8] its closure in is a nonempty irreducible closed subset of , which is a strict chain of length ; hence by [F2], and forces . For and any sheaf the group of global sections is , a singleton by [F18], that is the zero group; the functor is therefore the zero functor, which is exact, and by [F19] its positive derived functors vanish, so for every and the case holds. Now fix and assume the assertion for , i.e. for all Noetherian spaces of dimension at most and all sheaves on them. Since a Noetherian space has only finitely many irreducible components [F9], it is enough to prove, by induction on , the auxiliary statement : every Noetherian space with having at most irreducible components satisfies for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every .
Assume and , and let be Noetherian with and at most irreducible components; the spaces with fewer than components are covered by , so let have exactly components. Choose one component and let be the union of the remaining components of , a finite union by [F9], hence a closed subset of by [F3] and [F23]. Since is the union of its irreducible components by [F4], . Moreover : otherwise , a finite union of subsets closed in by [F3], and is irreducible and nonempty [F25], so for some component , that is , contradicting maximality of [F24]. The irreducible components of the space are exactly the components of : each such is an irreducible closed subset of by [F3], no is contained in the union of the others by the same maximality argument just given, and is that finite union, so [F6] applies; in particular has exactly irreducible components, and is Noetherian by [F16] with by [F2]. Finally let , the closure in of ; by [F7], whose hypotheses , irreducible and have just been verified, this is irreducible, and is nonempty because . By [F16] and [F2] the space is Noetherian of dimension at most , and by [F5] it has exactly one irreducible component; since we have , so applies to as well as to .
A space with no irreducible component is empty, because every point of a space lies in an irreducible component by [F4]; thus says that for all , which is the computation of [step 1.1] for the empty space, the classes of sheaves on being trivial and also vanishing there.
Keep the notation of [step 1.2] and let be a sheaf of abelian groups on ; write and let and be the inclusions. By [F13] there is a short exact sequence I claim for every . Indeed, if , then by [F26] there is an open neighbourhood of with ; every section of over an open has , so by [F28], and these are cofinal among the open neighbourhoods of , so the colimit of [F27] computing is a colimit of zero groups, that is . Therefore [F14] applies to and the closed subset , and the unit , the inclusion, is an isomorphism of sheaves; by [F17] it induces an isomorphism for every , and by [F11] the latter group is ; for this vanishes by applied to in [step 1.2]. Likewise for by [F11] and applied to .
: let be Noetherian with and at most one irreducible component, and let be open; I show for every . If this is [step 2.1], so assume ; then is irreducible, because [F4] puts every point in its sole irreducible component. If then is a sheaf on the empty space, so its only section group is zero by [F18], and and , whence in every degree [F19]. Assume now , put , and note that is closed in and . I claim . Let be a strict chain of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of the subspace ; each is also closed in by [F29] since is closed in , and irreducibility of is the same whether tested in or in , while itself is a nonempty irreducible closed subset of strictly containing ; so is a strict chain of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of , of length , and by [F2], that is ; hence by [F2]. Apply [F13] to : there is a short exact sequence the first term being identified with by clause 2 of [F13]. In the long exact sequence of [F15], the exact portion has vanishing outer terms for : the first is by [F11], and is Noetherian by [F16] with , so it vanishes by the induction hypothesis for because ; the second vanishes by [F12] because is irreducible and gives . Therefore for every and every open . Since is Noetherian with , [F10] now gives for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every , which is .
Let . The long exact sequence of [F15] attached to the short exact sequence of [step 2.2] contains the exact portion and both outer groups vanish for by [step 2.2]; hence . As was arbitrary this is for the space with exactly components, and spaces with fewer components are , so holds for all spaces of dimension at most with at most components; by induction on , using that all these spaces have finitely many components [F9], the assertion holds for every Noetherian space of dimension at most , which completes the induction on started in [step 1.1] and proves the theorem. The final clause follows from [F20], which identifies the condition with vanishing above for every sheaf in the class of all abelian sheaves. The Axiom of Choice [F21] is used for the supplied injective resolutions and the reduction [F10], and supplies DC for resolution comparison through [F22]: the cohomology groups used throughout are the derived functors of global sections computed from injective resolutions, as in [F15], [F11], [F12], [F17], [F19] and [F10], and the existence of those resolutions is what requires the choice principle; all topological arguments in [step 1.1], [step 3.1], [step 1.2] and [step 2.2] are choice-free. ∎
Depends on
- Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets
- Chain dimension and the empty-space convention
- Cohomological dimension relative to a sheaf class
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology
- Irreducible components of a topological space
- Existence and basic properties of irreducible components
- A Noetherian space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets
- Extension-by-zero generators detect sheaf-cohomology vanishing
- Pushforward along a closed immersion preserves sheaf cohomology
- Constant sheaves on irreducible spaces are flasque and acyclic
- Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence
- A sheaf with no stalks off a closed subset is a pushforward
- Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Variance of sheaf cohomology
- Subspaces of a Noetherian space and its compact open subsets
- A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set
- An exact functor has vanishing positive derived functors
- Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace
- Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- A point lies in the closure of $A$ iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets $A$; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals $A$ together with its derived set
- The stalk of a presheaf at a point
- Sheafification of a presheaf
- Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- Global sections of an abelian sheaf
- Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves
- Inverse image is left adjoint to direct image on sheaves
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)