How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the finiteness corollary cited below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (Field), let , and let be a closed immersion of schemes (Closed immersions of schemes, Relative projective space from standard charts). Thus the structure morphism (The underlying space of an affine spectrum) is projective over in the finite-dimensional H-projective convention (Projective morphisms before Proj), and it is proper (Projective morphisms are proper). Put a pullback of the twisting sheaf along the closed immersion (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces); it is an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves). The embedding and the sheaf are fixed once and for all, and below "projective " always means together with this fixed embedding.
Twists. For and an -module the -th twist of is (Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf), where denotes the -fold tensor power of for and the dual of the -fold tensor power for (Invertible sheaves).
The two functions. Let be a coherent -module (Coherent module sheaves). Each twist is then coherent again: coherence is local on , and on an open set on which the invertible sheaf is trivial the twist is isomorphic to (Invertible sheaves, Coherent module sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules). Since is proper over the field , the finiteness corollary Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field shows that every cohomology group (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections) is a finite-dimensional -vector space (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis) and that only finitely many of these groups are nonzero; hence the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf is a well-defined integer. The Hilbert function of with respect to the fixed embedding is the function and the Euler-characteristic function of is the function
Relation between the two. Writing for , only finitely many of which are nonzero, the two functions are related by In particular whenever the higher cohomology groups with all vanish; the higher groups contribute to the Euler-characteristic function but not to the Hilbert function, and the definition imposes no vanishing of them at any particular .
Hilbert polynomial. If there is a polynomial with then is called a Hilbert polynomial of with respect to the fixed embedding, and the notation is also used for it once it is known to exist. Existence and uniqueness of such a polynomial are not asserted by this definition.
If or , then all groups vanish, so and , and the zero polynomial is a Hilbert polynomial.
Depends on
- Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- The Axiom of Choice
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Coherent module sheaves
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf
- Field
- Invertible sheaves
- Projective morphisms before Proj
- Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf
- Projective morphisms are proper
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)