How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective morphisms are proper
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every projective morphism in the finite-dimensional H-projective convention of this page is proper: if factors over as with , a closed immersion and the second arrow the projection, then is proper. The empty source, the empty base and the case are included, and no Noetherian, field, reducedness or nonemptiness hypothesis is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a projective morphism with a factorization over , where , is a closed immersion and is the projection.
A morphism is projective on this page if for some it factors over as with a closed immersion; the relative projective space and its projection are those of the cited chart construction, and is allowed with . (Projective morphisms before Proj)
Assume AC. For every scheme and every the projection is proper. (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base)
Assume AC. Every closed immersion is finite, hence proper; the empty closed immersion is included. (Closed immersions are proper)
Assume AC. A composite of proper morphisms is proper. (Properness survives composition)
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
By [F1] the morphism admits a factorization over , where , is a closed immersion and is the projection of the relative projective space.
By the AC-qualified [F3] the closed immersion is finite, hence proper.
By the AC-qualified [F2] the projection is proper.
Since is a composite of the proper morphisms and , the AC-qualified [F4] shows that is proper.
This proves the theorem for the finite-dimensional H-projective convention fixed in [F1]; the separate projective-bundle convention of the sources is not treated here and is not claimed. The Axiom of Choice [F5] is assumed and is used only through [F2], [F3] and [F4]. The degenerate cases are included: for the projection is the isomorphism and is the closed immersion ; if then and the morphisms are the empty ones; if is the identity then is the projection, proper by [F2]; and if then is the empty closed immersion, proper by [F3]. No Noetherian, field, reducedness or nonemptiness hypothesis is imposed.
Depends on
Used by
- Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme Definition
- Eventual generation of coherent projective twists Lemma
- Fixed point for the specified Borel on a projective variety Lemma
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction Lemma
- Projective and proper are distinct notions Remark
- Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.44.5 (tag 01WC) and Lemma 29.44.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea, Section 17.4 and Exercise 11.3.F (standard reference, not scraped)