How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fixed point for the specified Borel on a projective variety
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be the connected simply connected complex semisimple affine algebraic group with maximal torus and Borel subgroup of Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety and Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates. Let be a projective -variety over : a projective -scheme of finite type together with a morphism defining an action of the group . Then every nonempty -stable closed subvariety contains a -fixed point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the group of [F1], a projective -variety over , and a nonempty -stable closed subvariety .
is a closed connected unipotent subgroup normalized by , , and is a closed connected solvable subgroup of . (Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates)
Every projective morphism in the finite-dimensional -projective convention of the source item is proper: a morphism factoring as a closed immersion into followed by the projection is proper. (Projective morphisms are proper)
For a morphism of schemes of finite type and quasi-separated, properness is equivalent to existence and uniqueness of lifts of every valuative diagram over an arbitrary valuation ring. (Valuative criterion for properness)
If is separated, is an -scheme and is an open subscheme with injective, then two -morphisms agreeing on are equal; in particular this holds for a topologically dense open in a reduced . (Agreement on a schematically dense open)
is an affine group scheme of finite type over whose underlying scheme is connected and smooth, with Lie algebra . (Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety)
Proof
Build a normal one-dimensional filtration of the specified . Order the positive roots by decreasing height, breaking ties arbitrarily, and put , with . If , and is a root, then , so . The height-raising BCH commutator law and polynomial root coordinates of [F1] therefore make each a closed connected subgroup normalized by ; normalizes it because it scales every root coordinate, so . The multiplication is a polynomial isomorphism by the same triangular root-coordinate recursion, and ; thus is generated by and one copy of . Choose a coordinate decomposition and let be the first factors, . The preimages of under are closed and normal in , and each is generated by and the next coordinate copy of . With for , this gives , with each extension generated by its predecessor and one algebraic root or torus subgroup isomorphic to or .
Base case of . Let be projective with a action, let be a nonempty stable closed subvariety, choose , and write , . Projectivity makes proper by [F2], so the valuative criterion [F3] extends the generic map uniquely to the discrete valuation ring at , where . This local-ring map extends to an actual Zariski neighbourhood: choose an affine open containing the image of the closed point; the map from the local spectrum factors through , and the images of finitely many generators of are fractions in with denominators nonzero at . Invert their product , with , to obtain a morphism agreeing with the valuation-ring lift. On the integral overlap it and agree at the generic point; because is separated, their equalizer is closed, and because the overlap is reduced and irreducible, a closed equalizer containing its generic point is the whole overlap as a scheme. Thus they glue over the open cover to a morphism . For , translation extends to an automorphism of fixing , so and agree on and therefore on by [F4]. Evaluating at gives . The point lies in because is closed and contains the dense-open image , so it is the required -fixed point.
Base case of . Let be projective with a action, let be a nonempty stable closed subvariety, choose , and put , . Apply [F3] to the generic map at the two missing points of . At use the local ring , and at use with ; each lift extends to an affine open neighbourhood or by the finite-generator denominator argument of step 1.2. The three maps on , and agree on each integral pairwise overlap: their equalizer is closed because is separated, contains the generic point, and therefore equals the reduced irreducible overlap as a scheme. Hence they glue to . For , multiplication extends to an automorphism of fixing , and the maps and agree on the dense open , hence everywhere by [F4]. Thus is -fixed; it lies in because is closed and contains the dense-open image .
Induct along the filtration of step 1.1. For any nonempty projective -variety , set and let be the reduced closed subscheme of points fixed by . It is closed: for each the equalizer of the automorphism with is closed because is separated, and the intersection of these closed subsets is closed; taking the reduced induced structure gives . Since , the action of preserves setwise, and the restricted action factors through the reduced closed subscheme : the source is reduced over the perfect field , so a morphism whose closed-point image lies in annihilates its radical ideal. Each is projective as a closed subscheme of . Suppose is nonempty. The next one-dimensional subgroup or from step 1.1 acts on the nonempty projective variety , since is normal in ; step 1.2 or step 2.1 gives an -fixed point there. As is generated by and , that point lies in , so is nonempty. Induction from to yields a -fixed point. This uses normality of the chosen root-height and torus subgroups, without asserting that an arbitrary kernel of a vector-group character is normal.
The closed subvariety is projective over (a closed subvariety of a projective scheme in the same projective embedding) and nonempty and -stable, so it is a nonempty projective -variety; applying step 3.1 with yields , that is, a -fixed point of . The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the statement and declared as the dependency The Axiom of Choice; it is inherited by the suppliers [F1], [F2], [F3] and [F4], each of which assumes it, and no additional choice is made in the argument beyond the choice of the point inside the nonempty variety.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes (standard reference, not scraped)