Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed point for the specified Borel on a projective variety

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be the connected simply connected complex semisimple affine algebraic group with maximal torus T and Borel subgroup B=T⋉U of Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety and Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates. Let Y be a projective B-variety over C: a projective C-scheme of finite type together with a morphism B×Y→Y defining an action of the group B. Then every nonempty B-stable closed subvariety Z⊆Y contains a B-fixed point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the group B=T⋉U of [F1], a projective B-variety Y over C, and a nonempty B-stable closed subvariety Z⊆Y.

[F1]

U is a closed connected unipotent subgroup normalized by T, T∩U=1, and B=T⋅U=T⋉U is a closed connected solvable subgroup of G. (Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates)

[F2]

Every projective morphism in the finite-dimensional H-projective convention of the source item is proper: a morphism factoring as a closed immersion into PSn followed by the projection is proper. (Projective morphisms are proper)

[F3]

For a morphism of schemes of finite type and quasi-separated, properness is equivalent to existence and uniqueness of lifts of every valuative diagram over an arbitrary valuation ring. (Valuative criterion for properness)

[F4]

If Y→S is separated, X is an S-scheme and U⊆X is an open subscheme with OX→j∗OU injective, then two S-morphisms X→Y agreeing on U are equal; in particular this holds for a topologically dense open U in a reduced X. (Agreement on a schematically dense open)

[F5]

G is an affine group scheme of finite type over C whose underlying scheme is connected and smooth, with Lie algebra g=Lie⁡G. (Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety)

Proof

1.1F1F5given

Build a normal one-dimensional filtration of the specified B=T⋉U. Order the positive roots β1,…,βm by decreasing height, breaking ties arbitrarily, and put Sj={β1,…,βj}, Uj=∏β∈SjUβ with U0=1. If β∈Sj, γ∈Φ+ and β+γ is a root, then ht⁡(β+γ)>ht⁡(β), so β+γ∈Sj. The height-raising BCH commutator law and polynomial root coordinates of [F1] therefore make each Uj a closed connected subgroup normalized by U; T normalizes it because it scales every root coordinate, so Uj◃B. The multiplication Uj−1×Uβj→Uj is a polynomial isomorphism by the same triangular root-coordinate recursion, and Uβj≅Ga; thus Uj is generated by Uj−1 and one copy of Ga. Choose a coordinate decomposition T≅Gml and let Tk≅Gmk be the first k factors, 0≤k≤l. The preimages Bm+k:=U⋊Tk of Tk under B→T are closed and normal in B, and each is generated by Bm+k−1 and the next coordinate copy of Gm. With Bj:=Uj for 0≤j≤m, this gives 1=B0◃B1◃⋯◃Bm+l=B, with each extension generated by its predecessor and one algebraic root or torus subgroup isomorphic to Ga or Gm.

1.2F2F3F4given

Base case of Ga. Let Y be projective with a Ga action, let Z⊆Y be a nonempty stable closed subvariety, choose y∈Z, and write F:At1→Y, t↦t⋅y. Projectivity makes Y proper by [F2], so the valuative criterion [F3] extends the generic map Spec⁡C(t)→Y uniquely to the discrete valuation ring C[s](s) at ∞, where s=t−1. This local-ring map extends to an actual Zariski neighbourhood: choose an affine open V⊆Y containing the image of the closed point; the map from the local spectrum factors through V, and the images of finitely many generators of O(V) are fractions in C[s](s) with denominators nonzero at s=0. Invert their product h(s), with h(0)≠0, to obtain a morphism D(h)⊆As1→V⊆Y agreeing with the valuation-ring lift. On the integral overlap D(h)∩At1 it and F agree at the generic point; because Y is separated, their equalizer is closed, and because the overlap is reduced and irreducible, a closed equalizer containing its generic point is the whole overlap as a scheme. Thus they glue over the open cover P1=At1∪D(h) to a morphism Φ:P1→Y. For a∈C, translation τa(t)=t+a extends to an automorphism of P1 fixing ∞, so a⋅Φ(t) and Φ(t+a) agree on At1 and therefore on P1 by [F4]. Evaluating at ∞ gives a⋅Φ(∞)=Φ(∞). The point Φ(∞) lies in Z because Z is closed and contains the dense-open image Φ(At1), so it is the required Ga-fixed point.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.2given

Base case of Gm. Let Y be projective with a Gm action, let Z⊆Y be a nonempty stable closed subvariety, choose y∈Z, and put φ:Gm→Y, t↦t⋅y. Apply [F3] to the generic map at the two missing points 0,∞ of P1. At 0 use the local ring C[t](t), and at ∞ use C[s](s) with s=t−1; each lift extends to an affine open neighbourhood D(h0) or D(h∞) by the finite-generator denominator argument of step 1.2. The three maps on Gm, D(h0) and D(h∞) agree on each integral pairwise overlap: their equalizer is closed because Y is separated, contains the generic point, and therefore equals the reduced irreducible overlap as a scheme. Hence they glue to Φ:P1→Y. For a∈Gm, multiplication t↦at extends to an automorphism of P1 fixing 0, and the maps a⋅Φ(t) and Φ(at) agree on the dense open Gm, hence everywhere by [F4]. Thus Φ(0) is Gm-fixed; it lies in Z because Z is closed and contains the dense-open image Φ(Gm).

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Induct along the filtration of step 1.1. For any nonempty projective B-variety Y, set Y0=Y and let Yj be the reduced closed subscheme of points fixed by Bj. It is closed: for each b∈Bj(C) the equalizer of the automorphism y↦b⋅y with id⁡Y is closed because Y is separated, and the intersection of these closed subsets is closed; taking the reduced induced structure gives Yj. Since Bj◃B, the action of B preserves Yj setwise, and the restricted action factors through the reduced closed subscheme Yj: the source B×Yj is reduced over the perfect field C, so a morphism whose closed-point image lies in Yj annihilates its radical ideal. Each Yj is projective as a closed subscheme of Y. Suppose Yj−1 is nonempty. The next one-dimensional subgroup Hj≅Ga or Gm from step 1.1 acts on the nonempty projective variety Yj−1, since Bj−1 is normal in B; step 1.2 or step 2.1 gives an Hj-fixed point there. As Bj is generated by Bj−1 and Hj, that point lies in Yj, so Yj is nonempty. Induction from Y0 to Ym+l=YB yields a B-fixed point. This uses normality of the chosen root-height and torus subgroups, without asserting that an arbitrary kernel of a vector-group character is normal.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1discharge-construct∎

The closed subvariety Z is projective over C (a closed subvariety of a projective scheme in the same projective embedding) and nonempty and B-stable, so it is a nonempty projective B-variety; applying step 3.1 with Y=Z yields ZB≠∅, that is, a B-fixed point of Z. The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the statement and declared as the dependency The Axiom of Choice; it is inherited by the suppliers [F1], [F2], [F3] and [F4], each of which assumes it, and no additional choice is made in the argument beyond the choice of the point y inside the nonempty variety.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources