How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Closed immersions are proper
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every closed immersion of schemes is finite, hence proper; the empty closed immersion is included, no Noetherian, reducedness or nonemptiness hypothesis is used, and the Axiom of Choice enters through the affine quotient structure of closed immersions and the properness of finite morphisms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a closed immersion .
A morphism is a closed immersion when its underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset of its target and the structure-sheaf map is surjective. (Closed immersions of schemes)
Assume AC. For a closed immersion and every affine open there is a unique ideal with over ; conversely every quotient map induces a closed immersion, every base change of a closed immersion is a closed immersion, and the empty subscheme of corresponds to . (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change)
A morphism is finite when for every affine open the inverse image is affine, , and is module-finite over ; the zero ring is allowed. (Finite morphisms of schemes)
A module is cyclic when it is generated by one element and finitely generated when it is generated by a finite subset; the zero module is generated by the empty family. (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module)
An -algebra is module-finite over when is finitely generated as an -module. (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)
Assume AC. Every finite morphism of schemes is proper. (Finite morphisms are proper)
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Let be an affine open of . By [F1] and [F2] the restriction of over is a closed immersion with over for the unique ideal ; in particular the inverse image is affine.
The quotient is cyclic as an -module: the class generates it, because every lies in the submodule generated by , while that submodule always lies in ; if then is generated by the empty family. Hence is finitely generated, equivalently module-finite, over by [F4] and [F5].
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 verify the condition of [F3] on every affine open of : the inverse image is affine, , and its coordinate algebra is module-finite over the coordinate algebra of . Therefore the closed immersion is finite.
By [F6] the finite morphism is proper. The empty closed immersion is included: over each affine it corresponds by [F2] to the ideal , so its inverse image is , an affine chart whose coordinate ring is the zero ring and is module-finite by [F3], and the same argument applies to it. The Axiom of Choice [F7] is assumed and is used only through [F2] and [F6], the two AC-qualified suppliers; no further selection occurs, and no Noetherian, reducedness or nonemptiness hypothesis is used.
Depends on
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Finite morphisms are proper
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Closed immersion from a quotient ring Example
- Incidence projection has closed determinantal image Example
- Chow lemma for proper Noetherian schemes Lemma
- Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper Lemma
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction Lemma
- Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms Theorem
- Projective morphisms are proper Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.45.5 (tag 01WG) and Lemma 29.44.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Lemma 26.10.1 (tag 01IN) (standard reference, not scraped)