How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a scheme and let . Then the structure morphism is proper. No Noetherian, field, reducedness or nonemptiness hypothesis is imposed on , and the empty base is included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A scheme , an integer , the projection of the relative projective space of Relative projective space from standard charts, and the Axiom of Choice.
The standard charts for are affine over and form an open cover of ; over an affine base one has , the overlap is the distinguished open , and on it for every , with the convention (so that ). The charts, their overlaps and these transitions commute with base change, and for an open subscheme . (Relative projective space from standard charts)
For every scheme and every the diagonal is a closed immersion; hence is separated. (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed)
For every scheme and every the projection is of finite type. (Projective space is of finite type over its base)
A morphism is of finite type exactly when it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms)
Assume AC. Let be a quasi-compact morphism. Then is universally closed if and only if every valuative diagram for over every valuation ring has a lift . (Valuation lifts detect universal closedness)
A valuative diagram for consists of a valuation ring with fraction field , a morphism and a morphism forming a commutative square; a lift is a morphism making both triangles commute. (Valuative uniqueness diagram)
A subring is a valuation ring of if for every at least one of and belongs to (Valuation rings); a valuation ring is local and its nonunits form its unique maximal ideal (A valuation ring is local).
A scheme is a locally ringed space in which every point has an open neighbourhood which, with the restricted structure sheaf, is an affine scheme. (Schemes)
A morphism is an open immersion if it identifies isomorphically with an open subscheme of ; in particular a morphism whose image lies in an open subscheme factors through it. (Open immersions of schemes)
For commutative unital rings the assignment gives a natural bijection . (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)
Iterating the universal property of a polynomial ring gives a unique unital ring homomorphism extending a prescribed map and sending each to a prescribed element . (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)
A morphism of schemes is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. (Proper morphisms)
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In the spectrum of a ring, a point is a specialization of exactly when . (Specialisation in a prime spectrum is reverse inclusion)
A morphism of schemes is a morphism of the underlying locally ringed spaces, so its underlying map is continuous. (Morphisms of schemes)
Proof
By [F3] the morphism is of finite type, hence by [F4] it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact, and by [F2] it is separated.
Let a valuative diagram for be given: a valuation ring with fraction field , morphisms and , and with [F6]. Let be the point corresponding to the unique maximal ideal of , which exists by [F7]. For every we have , so is a specialization of by [F14]. Continuity of [F15] shows that is a specialization of . Choose an affine open containing [F8]. Since is open and contains the specialization , it contains every generalization : otherwise its closed complement would contain and hence its closure, including . Thus the image of lies in and factors through [F9]. Since , the map factors through the open subscheme [F1, F9]. Replacing by , it suffices to construct a lift over the affine base ; when there is no morphism at all, so assume from here on that the diagram exists.
Over the affine base the charts , , form an open cover of [F1], so the point lies in some chart , which we fix; then factors through [F9]. By [F10] the morphism from to the affine chart corresponds to an -algebra homomorphism . Put for and .
The tuple has , so some entry is nonzero. We claim that there is an index with and for every . Start with and process the indices one at a time, maintaining the invariant that and for every already processed . If , then and is kept. If , apply [F7] to : either , and is kept, or , and we replace by ; in the second case for every processed , so the invariant is preserved. At the end for all , as claimed.
Since , the point lies in the distinguished open [F1], so factors through the open subscheme [F9]. By the transition formula of [F1], the restriction of to corresponds by [F10] to the -algebra homomorphism sending to , and for every by step 3.1.
Define to be the -algebra homomorphism with ; it exists and is unique with these values and the prescribed restriction to by the iterated universal property of polynomial rings [F11], and its composite with is the structure map encoded by . Let be the morphism corresponding to under [F10].
The composite corresponds under [F10] to the ring map , which is the structure map encoded by ; hence .
The composite corresponds under [F10] to the -algebra map sending to , and by step 4.1 this is the same map that the restriction of to corresponds to; hence .
Steps 1.2 through 6.2 produce a lift for an arbitrary valuative diagram for over an arbitrary valuation ring. Since is quasi-compact by step 1.1, [F5] shows that is universally closed. By [F12] a separated, finite-type, universally closed morphism is proper; with steps 1.1 and 1.2 this proves that is proper. The Axiom of Choice [F13] enters exactly through [F5]; the construction chose an affine open , one chart among the finitely many, and the index by a finite induction, so no other selection is made.
Depends on
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- The relative projective-space diagonal is closed
- Projective space is of finite type over its base
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Valuation lifts detect universal closedness
- Valuative uniqueness diagram
- Valuation rings
- Schemes
- Open immersions of schemes
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Proper morphisms
- The Axiom of Choice
- A valuation ring is local
- Specialisation in a prime spectrum is reverse inclusion
- Specialisations, generalisations, and generic points
- Morphisms of schemes
Used by
- Under AC, proper integral finite-type schemes over fields with multiple points are not affine Counterexample
- All twists on the projective line Example
- An upper jump of h0 in a flat projective family Example
- Incidence projection has closed determinantal image Example
- Chow lemma for proper Noetherian schemes Lemma
- Closed gluing of two projective three-spaces is proper Lemma
- Finite-stage descent of properness for finitely presented schemes Lemma
- High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme Theorem
- Projective morphisms are proper Theorem
- Veronese embedding pulls O(1) back to O(d) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.44.5 (tag 01WC) and Section 29.42 (tag 01W0), properness of projective space (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Constructions, Lemma 27.8.11 (tag 01MF), universally closedness of projective space (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea, sections on proper and projective morphisms and the valuative criteria (standard reference, not scraped)