Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Specialisation in a prime spectrum is reverse inclusion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring and let p,q∈Spec⁡(R). Then q is a specialisation of p if and only if p⊆q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, prime ideals p,q⊆R, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

A point y is a specialisation of x exactly when y∈{x}‾ (Specialisations, generalisations, and generic points).

[L2]

The closure of {p} is V(p) (The closure of a prime is its vanishing set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2

By [L1] and [L2], q is a specialisation of p exactly when q∈V(p).

2.1step 1.1algebra

By the definition of V(p), the condition q∈V(p) is exactly p⊆q.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Therefore specialisation in Spec⁡(R) is reverse inclusion of prime ideals.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources