How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The closure of a prime is its vanishing set
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring and let . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a prime ideal , and the Axiom of Choice.
Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal).
is the set of prime ideals containing (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).
Proof
Since , the point lies in by [L2]. Because is closed, the closure is contained in .
Let be a closed subset containing . By [L1], write for its radical defining ideal . Since , fact [L2] gives . Therefore every prime ideal containing also contains , so .
Step 1.2 shows that every closed set containing also contains . Hence is the smallest closed set containing , that is, .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 14.4(b) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.17: The spectrum of a ring (standard reference, not scraped)