Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring and let Z⊆Spec⁡(R) be a nonempty Zariski-closed subset. Write a=I(Z) for its unique radical defining ideal. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. Z is irreducible. 2. a is a prime ideal.

When these conditions hold, Z has the unique generic point a.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a nonempty Zariski-closed subset Z⊆Spec⁡(R), and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal; in particular Z=V(a) for the radical ideal a=I(Z) (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal).

[L2]

Vanishing sets satisfy V(JK)=V(J)∪V(K) and V(J+K)=V(J)∩V(K) (Vanishing-set identities).

[L3]

The closure of {p} is V(p) (The closure of a prime is its vanishing set).

[L4]

Distinct primes have distinct closures in a spectrum (Distinct primes have distinct closures, so the spectrum is T0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Suppose first that Z is irreducible. By [L1], write Z=V(a) with a radical. Let xy∈a. Then V(a)⊆V((xy))=V((x))∪V((y)) by [L2]. Since Z is irreducible, Z is contained in V((x)) or in V((y)). By [L1], this means x∈I(Z)=a or y∈I(Z)=a. Therefore a is prime.

1.2L1L2given

Suppose conversely that a is prime. If Z=F1∪F2 with F1,F2 closed subsets of Z, then each Fi is closed in the ambient spectrum, so [L1] gives radical ideals bi with Fi=V(bi). Using Z=V(a) and [L2], one has V(a)=V(b1)∪V(b2)=V(b1b2). Since [L1] identifies a as the radical defining ideal of Z, one has b1b2⊆a. Primality of a then gives b1⊆a or b2⊆a, so V(a)⊆V(b1) or V(a)⊆V(b2). Hence Z=F1 or Z=F2, and Z is irreducible.

2.1L3step 1.1step 1.2

Under either condition, steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that a is prime and Z=V(a). By [L3], the closure of {a} is V(a)=Z, so a is a generic point of Z in the sense of Specialisations, generalisations, and generic points.

3.1L3L4step 2.1

If η is another generic point of Z, then [L3] gives {η}‾=Z={a}‾. Fact [L4] now forces η=a. Thus the generic point is unique.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1∎

Therefore a nonempty Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and in that case it has the unique generic point a.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources