Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring and let ZSpec(R) be a nonempty Zariski-closed subset. Write a=I(Z) for its unique radical defining ideal. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. Z is irreducible. 2. a is a prime ideal.

When these conditions hold, Z has the unique generic point a.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a nonempty Zariski-closed subset ZSpec(R), and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal; in particular Z=V(a) for the radical ideal a=I(Z) (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal).

[L2]

Vanishing sets satisfy V(JK)=V(J)V(K) and V(J+K)=V(J)V(K) (Vanishing-set identities).

[L3]

The closure of {p} is V(p) (The closure of a prime is its vanishing set).

[L4]

Distinct primes have distinct closures in a spectrum (Distinct primes have distinct closures, so the spectrum is T0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose first that Z is irreducible. By [L1], write Z=V(a) with a radical. Let xya. Then V(a)V((xy))=V((x))V((y)) by [L2]. Since Z is irreducible, Z is contained in V((x)) or in V((y)). By [L1], this means xI(Z)=a or yI(Z)=a. Therefore a is prime.

L1L2given
1.2

Suppose conversely that a is prime. If Z=F1F2 with F1,F2 closed subsets of Z, then each Fi is closed in the ambient spectrum, so [L1] gives radical ideals bi with Fi=V(bi). Using Z=V(a) and [L2], one has V(a)=V(b1)V(b2)=V(b1b2). Since [L1] identifies a as the radical defining ideal of Z, one has b1b2a. Primality of a then gives b1a or b2a, so V(a)V(b1) or V(a)V(b2). Hence Z=F1 or Z=F2, and Z is irreducible.

L1L2given
2.1

Under either condition, steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that a is prime and Z=V(a). By [L3], the closure of {a} is V(a)=Z, so a is a generic point of Z in the sense of Specialisations, generalisations, and generic points.

L3step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

If η is another generic point of Z, then [L3] gives {η}=Z={a}. Fact [L4] now forces η=a. Thus the generic point is unique.

L3L4step 2.1
4.1

Therefore a nonempty Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and in that case it has the unique generic point a.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources