How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing-set identities
Statement
Let be a commutative ring.
- .
- .
- For every family of ideals,
- For every finite family of ideals with ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring .
is the set of prime ideals containing (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).
Vanishing sets turn arbitrary sums into intersections (Vanishing sets of arbitrary sums).
Vanishing sets turn finite products into unions (Vanishing sets of finite products).
Proof
Every prime ideal contains , so . No prime ideal equals the whole ring, so no prime ideal contains ; hence .
The arbitrary-sum identity is exactly [L2], and the finite-product identity is exactly [L3].
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 supply the four listed vanishing-set identities.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §14 The spectrum of a ring (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.17: The spectrum of a ring (standard reference, not scraped)