How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing sets of arbitrary sums
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, and let be a family of ideals of . Write for the ideal of finite sums of elements drawn from the family, with the empty sum equal to . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and a family of ideals of .
is the set of prime ideals containing the ideal (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).
Proof
If , then . Since every is contained in that sum, one has for every , so for all .
Conversely, if for every , then each lies in . Because is an ideal, it contains every finite sum of elements coming from the family, hence it contains . Therefore .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the displayed equality.
Depends on
Used by
- Vanishing-set identities Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §14 The spectrum of a ring (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §13 The Spectrum of a Ring (standard reference, not scraped)