Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vanishing sets of arbitrary sums

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, and let (Iλ)λ∈Λ be a family of ideals of R. Write ∑λ∈ΛIλ for the ideal of finite sums of elements drawn from the family, with the empty sum equal to 0. Then V ⁣(∑λ∈ΛIλ)=⋂λ∈ΛV(Iλ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R and a family (Iλ)λ∈Λ of ideals of R.

[L1]

V(K) is the set of prime ideals containing the ideal K (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

If p∈V ⁣(∑λIλ), then ∑λIλ⊆p. Since every Iλ is contained in that sum, one has Iλ⊆p for every λ, so p∈V(Iλ) for all λ.

1.2L1givenalgebra

Conversely, if p∈V(Iλ) for every λ, then each Iλ lies in p. Because p is an ideal, it contains every finite sum of elements coming from the family, hence it contains ∑λIλ. Therefore p∈V ⁣(∑λIλ).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the displayed equality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources