Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An upper jump of h0 in a flat projective family

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice as inherited from the cited suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

Let k be a field (Field) and let S=Spec⁡k[a] be the affine line over k (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution), with origin (a)∈S and generic point η. Let X=PS1 with its two standard charts U0, U1, whose coordinate rings over S are k[a,z] and k[a,z−1] with z=x1/x0 (Relative projective space from standard charts, Two-affine projective line and its twists, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). Then there exist a rank-two vector bundle E on X (a locally free OX-module of finite rank Locally free sheaves of finite rank, Modules on a ringed space) that is flat over S (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms) and a short exact sequence of OX-modules 0⟶OX(−2)⟶E⟶OX⟶0, constructed by gluing the free rank-two modules with frames (u0,v0) over U0 and (u1,v1) over U1 by the transition u1=z−2u0,v1=v0+a z−1u0 on U0∩U1, whose determinant z−2 is a unit there. The extension cocycle of this sequence with respect to the cover {U0,U1} is a x0−1x1−1=a z−1 x0−2  ∈  Γ(U0∩U1,OX(−2)), so that on the fibre over a point u∈S the extension class is a(u) times the generator [1/(x0x1)] of H1(Pκ(u)1,O(−2))≅κ(u) (Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2), The residue field at a point of an affine scheme).

For every point u∈S let Xu=X×SSpec⁡κ(u) be the fibre, Eu the pullback of E (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces) and h0(Eu)=dim⁡κ(u)H0(Xu,Eu) (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections). Then:

  1. over the origin, h0(E(a))=1, the section restricting to v0 and v1 on the two charts being a basis;
  2. for every other point u≠(a) of S, including every closed point and the generic point η, h0(Eu)=0.

In particular h0 jumps up at the origin, in agreement with the upper semicontinuity of Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions: the sublevel set {h0<1}=S∖{(a)} is open. The field k is arbitrary, including k=F2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (and the Axiom of Dependent Choice through the upper-semicontinuity corollary), a field k, the base S=Spec⁡k[a] with the projective line X=PS1, its standard charts U0,U1 with coordinate z, and the glued rank-two bundle E of the statement.

[F1]

Charts and sections: X=PS1 is covered by the two affine charts U0 and U1 with OX(U0)=k[a,z], OX(U1)=k[a,z−1] and OX(U0∩U1)=k[a,z,z−1], where z=x1/x0 is a unit on the overlap; the global sections of the structure sheaf are OX(X)=k[a], so inside OX(U0∩U1) one has k[a,z]∩k[a,z−1]=k[a]. The twisting sheaf OX(1) is trivialised on U0 by x0 and on U1 by x1, with frame transition e1=z e0, so OX(d) has transition frame e1=zde0 and OX(−2) has transition z−2. (Relative projective space from standard charts, Two-affine projective line and its twists, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Twisting sheaf on Proj, Standard opens are affine, Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open)

[F2]

Gluing: a gluing datum (Fi,φij) for modules on an open cover of a ringed space glues to an OX-module F with isomorphisms F∣Ui≅Fi inducing the given φij, unique up to unique isomorphism; sections of F over an open W are the compatible families of sections of the Fi over W∩Ui, and if every Fi is free of rank r then F is locally free of rank r. (Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism, A gluing datum for sheaves on an open cover, Locally free sheaves of finite rank, Modules on a ringed space)

[F3]

Flatness: k[a,z] and k[a,z−1] are free k[a]-modules, hence flat, and a free module over a commutative ring is flat; a free module over a ring which is flat over the base, localised at a prime, is flat over the corresponding local ring of the base. Consequently E is finitely presented as an OX-module and flat over S, and X→S is proper by Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base and of finite presentation by its two polynomial charts and quasi-compact overlaps. Moreover the chart rings are Noetherian by A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian and If R is Noetherian then R[x1,…,xn] is Noetherian for every n∈N; hence the locally free finite-rank E is coherent by Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme. (Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank)

[F4]

The fibre computation: for a field κ and a scalar λ∈κ, let Nλ be the module on Pκ1 obtained by gluing free rank-two modules with frames (u0,v0) over D+(x0)=Spec⁡κ[z] and (u1,v1) over D+(x1)=Spec⁡κ[z−1] by u1=z−2u0, v1=v0+λz−1u0. Then dim⁡κH0(Pκ1,Nλ)=1 if λ=0 and 0 if λ≠0. (Constructed in the proof from [F1] and [F2]; no separate library item.)

[F5]

The extension cocycle: on Pk1 the class of x0−1x1−1 spans H1(Pk1,O(−2))≅k, for every field k. Hence the Čech cocycle of the statement, whose value in the frame u0=x0−2 of OX(−2)∣U0 is az−1, is a times this generator on each fibre, and the fibre sequence is 0→O(−2)→Eu→O→0. The long exact sequence of this sequence is 0→H0(O(−2))→H0(Eu)→H0(O)→δuH1(O(−2))→H1(Eu)→0, and δu(1)=a(u)⋅[1/(x0x1)]: the two standard affine charts and their intersection are acyclic for quasi-coherent sheaves, so Čech computes the long-exact connecting map by lifting 1 on each chart and taking their difference, as calculated in step 1.2. (Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2), Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme, Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology, Twisting sheaf on Proj)

[F6]

Upper semicontinuity: for a proper morphism of finite presentation with a coherent module flat over the base, hq(s)=dim⁡κ(s)Hq(Xs,Fs) is upper semicontinuous for every q; the corollary inherits the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice. (Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions, The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections)

Proof

technique · direct: build the rank-two bundle by gluing two free rank-two modules over the two standard charts with an invertible transition matrix, verify the sub-line-bundle and quotient, check flatness from the local freeness over the flat charts, and compute the global sections on each fibre by solving the two-chart gluing equations with power-series comparisons in the field's Laurent polynomial ring
1.1F1F2

The gluing datum. On U0 let F0=OU0⊕2 with frame u0,v0 and on U1 let F1=OU1⊕2 with frame u1,v1. On the overlap, which is D(z)⊆U0 mapped isomorphically to D(z−1)⊆U1 by z↔z−1 by [F1], define φ10:F0∣U0∩U1→F1∣U0∩U1 by u0↦z2u1 and v0↦−a z u1+v1, equivalently u1=z−2u0, v1=v0+az−1u0. The matrix (z−2az−101) has determinant z−2, a unit on the overlap, so φ10 is an isomorphism; with φ01=φ10−1 and φ00=φ11=id⁡, the cocycle condition is vacuous on a two-element cover. By [F2] the datum glues to an OX-module E, locally free of rank two, with E∣U0≅OU0⊕2 in the frame u0,v0 and similarly over U1.

1.2F1F2F5

The sub-line-bundle and the quotient. The submodules OU0u0 and OU1u1 are identified by φ10 because u0↦z2u1 and z−2u0=u1, so by [F2] they glue to a rank-one submodule L⊆E with L∣U0=Ou0 and L∣U1=Ou1; its transition is u1=z−2u0, which by [F1] is the transition of OX(−2), so L≅OX(−2) (both are invertible modules glued from trivialisations with the same transition function, and they agree on the overlap identifications). Likewise the classes vˉi of vi in the quotients glue with transition vˉ1=vˉ0, so the quotient E/L is isomorphic to OX. Checking on the two charts, the kernel of E→OX is exactly L, so 0→OX(−2)→E→OX→0 is exact, and the extension cocycle with respect to {U0,U1} is the off-diagonal entry az−1 read in the frame u0=x0−2 of OX(−2)∣U0, that is, a x0−1x1−1. On a fibre over u, lift the global section 1 of the quotient O by v0 and v1 on the two affine charts. Their overlap difference is v1−v0=a(u)z−1u0; the Čech comparison and class calculation of [F5] therefore give δu(1)=a(u)[1/(x0x1)] directly.

1.3F2F31.1

Flatness and finite presentation. By [F3] the coordinate rings k[a,z], k[a,z−1] are free, hence flat, over k[a], so the free modules E∣U0≅OU0⊕2 and E∣U1≅OU1⊕2 are flat over S and finitely presented; flatness and finite presentation are local, so E is flat over S and finitely presented, and X→S is proper of finite presentation since PS1→S is projective.

1.4F1F41.2

Fibre sections. Fix u∈S with residue field κ=κ(u) and scalar λ=a(u)∈κ; the fibre Xu=Pκ1 has the two charts Spec⁡κ[z], Spec⁡κ[z−1], the pullback Eu has the same gluing datum with a replaced by λ, and, by [F4], h0(Eu)=1 when λ=0 and h0(Eu)=0 when λ≠0. Indeed, a global section is given by a1(z)u0+b1(z)v0 on U0 and c1(z−1)u1+d1(z−1)v1 on U1 with a1,b1∈κ[z], c1,d1∈κ[z−1]; rewriting the U1-expression in the frame of U0 over the overlap and comparing coefficients gives b1=d1 and a1=z−2c1+λz−1b1. If λ=0 then a1=z−2c1 with a1∈κ[z], c1∈κ[z−1], which forces c1=a1=0, while b1=d1∈κ[z]∩κ[z−1]=κ by [F1]; the solutions form the one-dimensional space spanned by the section restricting to v0 and v1. If λ≠0 then b1=d1=β∈κ by [F1], and z2a1=(λβ)z+c1 is an equality in κ[z,z−1]. Its coefficient of z gives λβ=0 because the left side has only degrees at least 2 and c1 has only nonpositive degrees. Then z2a1=c1 lies in z2κ[z]∩κ[z−1]=0, so a1=c1=0: the only global section is zero.

1.51.11.4

The jump. The origin (a)∈S has residue field k and λ=a((a))=0, so h0(E(a))=1 by 1.4 with basis the section restricting to v0 and v1; every other point u≠(a) has a(u)≠0: if the corresponding prime contained a, it would contain the maximal ideal (a) and therefore equal (a); this covers closed points of arbitrary residue degree as well as the generic point — so h0(Eu)=0 by 1.4. Both assertions of the statement follow, and the fibres are Pκ(u)1.

2.1F2F4F5F61.11.41.5∎

Boundaries and consistency. The field k is arbitrary, including k=F2; the special fibre is nonempty and E(a)≅O(−2)⊕O there because the transition matrix is diagonal when a=0, consistent with h0=1. Since h0 takes the value 1 at the origin and 0 on the nonempty open complement S∖{(a)}, the function is upper semicontinuous in the sense of [F6] and the example shows that the jump is an upward one at the origin, so the conclusion of [F6] cannot be improved to local constancy of h0; the long exact sequence of [F5] gives the same kernel and cokernel description of the connecting map δu (multiplication by a(u)), so vanishing of the class at the origin is exactly the failure of the connecting map to be injective. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited through [F6] and the gluing and cohomology suppliers of [F2], [F4] and [F5]; no further family is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

179 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources