Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from sheaf cohomology. Let X be a quasi-compact separated scheme (Separated morphism of schemes), let U0,…,Ur be a finite affine open cover of X and let F be a quasi-coherent OX-module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then every intersection of one or more members of this cover is affine, and, writing C∙(U,F) for the ordered Čech cochain complex of the cover in the given order (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover), the canonical comparison map Hˇq(U,F)⟶Hq(X,F) of the ordered Čech cohomology (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology) with sheaf cohomology (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections) is an isomorphism for every q≥0. The empty scheme is included: its cover may have no members or any finite number of empty members, and all cochain and cohomology groups are zero, so the comparison is the unique map 0→0. An empty index set is allowed in this case; r=0 gives a one-member cover.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A quasi-compact separated scheme X, a finite affine open cover U0,…,Ur of X and a quasi-coherent OX-module F.

[F1]

Separatedness criterion: if f:X→S, S=⋃iWi is an affine open cover, and each f−1(Wi) is covered by affine opens Uij=Spec⁡Bij over Wi=Spec⁡Ai, then f is separated exactly when, for every pair Uij,Uik over the same Wi, the intersection is affine and the natural map Bij⊗AiBik→Γ(Uij∩Uik,OX) is surjective. Equivalently, this condition may be checked for all pairs of affine opens over a common affine open of S; a single pair does not characterize separatedness. Thus, if X is separated over an affine base, every pair of affine opens of X has affine intersection. Empty intersections use the zero ring convention. (Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness, Separated morphism of schemes)

[F2]

The restriction of a quasi-coherent module to an open subscheme is quasi-coherent. (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)

[F3]

If Y is an affine scheme, including the empty affine scheme and the zero module, and G is quasi-coherent on Y, then Hq(Y,G)=0 for every q>0. (Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves)

[F4]

A cover (Ui)i∈I indexed by a linearly ordered set is F-acyclic when Hq(W,F∣W)=0 for all q>0 on every nonempty finite intersection W of its members. (Acyclic open cover for a sheaf)

[F5]

Leray acyclic-cover comparison: for an open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set and F-acyclic in the sense of [F4], the canonical comparison Hˇp(U,F)→Hp(X,F) is an isomorphism for every p≥0. (Leray acyclic-cover comparison)

[F6]

The ordered Čech cohomology Hˇq(U,F) is the cohomology of the complex C∙(U,F) under the given linear order of the index set, with the alternating signs of the Čech differential. (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology, Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover)

Proof

technique · direct: separatedness makes finite intersections of the affine cover affine, affine acyclicity makes the cover acyclic for the quasi-coherent sheaf, and the Leray comparison theorem finishes
1.1F1

Let U=Spec⁡B, V=Spec⁡C be affine opens of X. Fix an affine open W of the base of X over which both lie — for the structure morphism X→Spec⁡Z one may take W=Spec⁡Z itself. Since X is separated, the criterion [F1] applies to the pair U,V and shows that U∩V is affine, the empty intersection being the empty affine scheme.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Every finite intersection of members of the cover is affine. The claim is clear for one member; if Ui1∩⋯∩Uik is affine, its intersection with the affine open Uik+1 is affine by step 1.1. Consequently, for every nonempty finite intersection W of members of the cover, W is affine and F∣W is quasi-coherent by [F2], so Hq(W,F∣W)=0 for every q>0 by [F3]. This is exactly the acyclicity condition of [F4] for F and the cover, whose index set {0,…,r} is linearly ordered by the given ordering of the cover.

3.1F3F5F6step 2.1∎

Apply [F5] to the linearly ordered F-acyclic cover U0,…,Ur: the canonical comparison map Hˇq(U,F)→Hq(X,F) is an isomorphism for every q≥0, where the left-hand side is the cohomology of the ordered complex C∙(U,F) by [F6]. Boundary cases: if X=∅ every member of the cover is empty (including when the index set is empty), so every cochain group and both sides vanish; if r=0 the complex has the single term Γ(X,F) and the comparison is the identity in degree zero; degree q=0 is the global-sections identification and positive q is covered by the acyclicity of step 2.1. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F3] and [F5], with the finite induction of step 2.1 making no further selection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources