How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from sheaf cohomology. Let be a quasi-compact separated scheme (Separated morphism of schemes), let be a finite affine open cover of and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then every intersection of one or more members of this cover is affine, and, writing for the ordered Čech cochain complex of the cover in the given order (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover), the canonical comparison map of the ordered Čech cohomology (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology) with sheaf cohomology (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections) is an isomorphism for every . The empty scheme is included: its cover may have no members or any finite number of empty members, and all cochain and cohomology groups are zero, so the comparison is the unique map . An empty index set is allowed in this case; gives a one-member cover.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A quasi-compact separated scheme , a finite affine open cover of and a quasi-coherent -module .
Separatedness criterion: if , is an affine open cover, and each is covered by affine opens over , then is separated exactly when, for every pair over the same , the intersection is affine and the natural map is surjective. Equivalently, this condition may be checked for all pairs of affine opens over a common affine open of ; a single pair does not characterize separatedness. Thus, if is separated over an affine base, every pair of affine opens of has affine intersection. Empty intersections use the zero ring convention. (Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness, Separated morphism of schemes)
The restriction of a quasi-coherent module to an open subscheme is quasi-coherent. (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)
If is an affine scheme, including the empty affine scheme and the zero module, and is quasi-coherent on , then for every . (Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves)
A cover indexed by a linearly ordered set is -acyclic when for all on every nonempty finite intersection of its members. (Acyclic open cover for a sheaf)
Leray acyclic-cover comparison: for an open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set and -acyclic in the sense of [F4], the canonical comparison is an isomorphism for every . (Leray acyclic-cover comparison)
The ordered Čech cohomology is the cohomology of the complex under the given linear order of the index set, with the alternating signs of the Čech differential. (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology, Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover)
Proof
Let , be affine opens of . Fix an affine open of the base of over which both lie — for the structure morphism one may take itself. Since is separated, the criterion [F1] applies to the pair and shows that is affine, the empty intersection being the empty affine scheme.
Every finite intersection of members of the cover is affine. The claim is clear for one member; if is affine, its intersection with the affine open is affine by step 1.1. Consequently, for every nonempty finite intersection of members of the cover, is affine and is quasi-coherent by [F2], so for every by [F3]. This is exactly the acyclicity condition of [F4] for and the cover, whose index set is linearly ordered by the given ordering of the cover.
Apply [F5] to the linearly ordered -acyclic cover : the canonical comparison map is an isomorphism for every , where the left-hand side is the cohomology of the ordered complex by [F6]. Boundary cases: if every member of the cover is empty (including when the index set is empty), so every cochain group and both sides vanish; if the complex has the single term and the comparison is the identity in degree zero; degree is the global-sections identification and positive is covered by the acyclicity of step 2.1. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F3] and [F5], with the finite induction of step 2.1 making no further selection.
Depends on
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves
- Acyclic open cover for a sheaf
- Leray acyclic-cover comparison
- Fixed-cover Čech cohomology
- Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
Used by
- An upper jump of h0 in a flat projective family Example
- Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2) Example
- Embedding compatibility of smooth-projective Gysin traces Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
- Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology Lemma
- Higher direct images localize over an affine base Lemma
- Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms Theorem
- Finite coherent cohomology for proper schemes Theorem
- Projective n-space has quasi-coherent cohomological dimension at most n Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Section 18.2 (standard reference, not scraped)