How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2)
Example
Let be a field, let with the two standard charts , ordered by , and let be the twisting sheaf (Relative projective space from standard charts, Twisting sheaf on Proj). Then is a Čech -cocycle for this cover, and its class spans the -vector space (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections); in particular the class is nonzero and is a basis of . Every field is allowed, including , and no smoothness, Noetherian or characteristic hypothesis is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field ; the projective line with the standard charts , and the twisting sheaf ; and the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cited suppliers.
Charts and affine cover (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Standard opens are affine): ; the standard charts are affine open subschemes forming a cover of , and the intersection is again affine; the index set is ordered by .
Separatedness (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed): the diagonal is a closed immersion, so the structure morphism of over is separated.
Twists and their sections (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf, Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open): is the associated sheaf of the graded module , , it is quasi-coherent, and for a homogeneous of positive degree is the degree-zero part of the homogeneous localisation; for this module has as -basis the Laurent monomials with , and the element is the member .
Ordered Čech complex (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover, Fixed-cover Čech cohomology): for an open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set one has with the alternating Čech differential; for the two-member cover this gives , and for , with .
Monomial decomposition of the Čech complex (Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex): for with the ordered standard cover and one has , the sum over with , where is free on basis elements indexed by the -element subsets , ; if then and all higher cohomology vanishes, if then and the other groups vanish, and if is nonempty and proper then is contractible; cohomology of the total complex is the direct sum of the cohomologies of the summands.
Čech comparison (Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme): for a quasi-compact separated scheme with a finite affine open cover and a quasi-coherent -module , the canonical comparison is an isomorphism for every .
Top cohomology of projective twists (Top cohomology of projective twists): for the group is the free -module on the Laurent monomials with all and , and it is zero for ; for a field, and there is exactly one such monomial, , so is free of rank one over .
The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function, inherited here from [F6] and [F7].
Verification
Proof technique: direct: the two-member Čech complex is computed by the Laurent-monomial decomposition, in which exactly one summand is all-negative and contributes the class of , and the comparison theorem identifies this Čech class with the cohomology class.
The cover ordered by is a finite affine open cover of the quasi-compact separated scheme , and is quasi-coherent, so by [F6] the comparison map is an isomorphism.
For the two-member cover the ordered Čech complex is with , and ; hence every -cochain is a cocycle and , and by [F3] the element is the basis monomial of .
In the monomial decomposition [F5] with and , a summand with would require and , which is impossible, and holds only for , whose summand satisfies and , so it contributes generated by the class of ; every other has nonempty proper and contributes a contractible summand with zero cohomology, so .
By the isomorphism of step 1.1 the class of spans , which by [F7] is free on the single all-negative monomial and hence is ; in particular the class is nonzero and forms a basis.
Boundary and degenerate cases: is a field, so , is nonempty and both charts and their intersection are nonempty; is the endpoint at which the top group has rank and is nonzero, whereas gives and gives higher rank; the degree is the top degree of the two-chart cover and the only degree in which a cohomology class is exhibited; the field and fields of every characteristic are allowed; the cover, the monomial and the comparison map are canonical, so no selection beyond the inherited [A1] occurs.
Depends on
- Top cohomology of projective twists
- The Axiom of Choice
- Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover
- Fixed-cover Čech cohomology
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf
- Twisting sheaf on Proj
- Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open
- Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex
- The relative projective-space diagonal is closed
- Standard opens are affine
- Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme
- Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)