Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2)

Example

Let k be a field, let X=Pk1 with the two standard charts U0=D+(x0), U1=D+(x1) ordered by 0<1, and let OX(−2) be the twisting sheaf (Relative projective space from standard charts, Twisting sheaf on Proj). Then 1/(x0x1)=x0−1x1−1  ∈  Γ(U0∩U1,OX(−2)) is a Čech 1-cocycle for this cover, and its class spans the k-vector space H1(X,OX(−2))  ≅  k (Fixed-cover Čech cohomology, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections); in particular the class is nonzero and is a basis of H1. Every field k is allowed, including F2, and no smoothness, Noetherian or characteristic hypothesis is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k; the projective line X=Pk1 with the standard charts U0=D+(x0), U1=D+(x1) and the twisting sheaf OX(−2); and the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cited suppliers.

[F1]

Charts and affine cover (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Standard opens are affine): X=Pk1≅Proj⁡k[x0,x1]; the standard charts Ui=D+(xi) are affine open subschemes forming a cover of X, and the intersection U0∩U1=D+(x0x1) is again affine; the index set {0,1} is ordered by 0<1.

[F2]

Separatedness (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed): the diagonal ΔX/k is a closed immersion, so the structure morphism of X over Spec⁡k is separated.

[F3]

Twists and their sections (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf, Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open): OX(−2) is the associated sheaf S(−2)~ of the graded module S(−2), S=k[x0,x1], it is quasi-coherent, and for a homogeneous f of positive degree Γ(D+(f),OX(−2))=S(−2)(f) is the degree-zero part of the homogeneous localisation; for f=x0x1 this module has as k-basis the Laurent monomials x0e0x1e1 with e0+e1=−2, and the element 1/(x0x1) is the member e=(−1,−1).

[F4]

Ordered Čech complex (Ordered Čech cochain complex of a cover, Fixed-cover Čech cohomology): for an open cover indexed by a linearly ordered set one has Cp=∏i0<⋯<ipF(Ui0∩⋯∩Uip) with the alternating Čech differential; for the two-member cover U0,U1 this gives C0=F(U0)⊕F(U1), C1=F(U0∩U1) and Cp=0 for p≥2, with δ0(s0,s1)=(s1−s0)∣U0∩U1.

[F5]

Monomial decomposition of the Čech complex (Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex): for X=PAn with the ordered standard cover and OX(d) one has C∙(U,OX(d))=⨁eK∙(e), the sum over e∈Zn+1 with ∑iei=d, where Kp(e) is free on basis elements xσe indexed by the (p+1)-element subsets σ⊇N(e), N(e)={i:ei<0}; if N(e)=∅ then H0(K∙(e))=A and all higher cohomology vanishes, if N(e)={0,…,n} then Hn(K∙(e))=A and the other groups vanish, and if N(e) is nonempty and proper then K∙(e) is contractible; cohomology of the total complex is the direct sum of the cohomologies of the summands.

[F6]

Čech comparison (Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme): for a quasi-compact separated scheme X with a finite affine open cover U0,…,Ur and a quasi-coherent OX-module F, the canonical comparison Hˇq(U,F)→Hq(X,F) is an isomorphism for every q≥0.

[F7]

Top cohomology of projective twists (Top cohomology of projective twists): for n≥1 the group Hn(PAn,O(d)) is the free A-module on the Laurent monomials x0e0⋯xnen with all ei<0 and ∑iei=d, and it is zero for d>−n−1; for A=k a field, n=1 and d=−2 there is exactly one such monomial, x0−1x1−1, so H1(Pk1,O(−2)) is free of rank one over k.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function, inherited here from [F6] and [F7].

Verification

Proof technique: direct: the two-member Čech complex is computed by the Laurent-monomial decomposition, in which exactly one summand is all-negative and contributes the class of 1/(x0x1), and the comparison theorem identifies this Čech class with the cohomology class.

1.1F1F2F3F6

The cover (U0,U1) ordered by 0<1 is a finite affine open cover of the quasi-compact separated scheme X, and OX(−2) is quasi-coherent, so by [F6] the comparison map Hˇ1(U,OX(−2))→H1(X,OX(−2)) is an isomorphism.

2.1F4F3step 1.1

For the two-member cover the ordered Čech complex is 0→C0→δ0C1→0 with C0=Γ(U0,OX(−2))⊕Γ(U1,OX(−2)), C1=Γ(U0∩U1,OX(−2)) and δ0(s0,s1)=(s1−s0)∣U0∩U1; hence every 1-cochain is a cocycle and Hˇ1(U,OX(−2))=C1/im⁡δ0, and by [F3] the element 1/(x0x1) is the basis monomial x(−1,−1) of C1.

3.1F5step 2.1

In the monomial decomposition [F5] with n=1 and d=−2, a summand with N(e)=∅ would require e0,e1≥0 and e0+e1=−2, which is impossible, and N(e)={0,1} holds only for e=(−1,−1), whose summand satisfies K0=0 and K1=k⋅x{0,1}(−1,−1), so it contributes H1=k generated by the class of x(−1,−1); every other e has nonempty proper N(e) and contributes a contractible summand with zero cohomology, so Hˇ1(U,OX(−2))=k⋅[1/(x0x1)].

4.1F7step 1.1step 3.1

By the isomorphism of step 1.1 the class of 1/(x0x1) spans H1(X,OX(−2)), which by [F7] is free on the single all-negative monomial x0−1x1−1 and hence is k; in particular the class is nonzero and forms a basis.

5.1A1F1F7step 4.1∎

Boundary and degenerate cases: k is a field, so k≠0, X is nonempty and both charts and their intersection are nonempty; d=−2=−n−1 is the endpoint at which the top group H1 has rank (11)=1 and is nonzero, whereas d>−2 gives H1=0 and d<−2 gives higher rank; the degree q=1=n is the top degree of the two-chart cover and the only degree in which a cohomology class is exhibited; the field k=F2 and fields of every characteristic are allowed; the cover, the monomial x0−1x1−1 and the comparison map are canonical, so no selection beyond the inherited [A1] occurs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources