How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Top cohomology of projective twists
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited theorem (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a commutative ring with (Commutative ring), let , let and let be the twisting sheaf on (Relative projective space from standard charts, Twisting sheaf on Proj). If , then is the free -module on the Laurent monomials with for every and . It is zero for , and for it has rank (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ) whenever , while it is the zero module for . For the top group is for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice as inherited, a commutative ring with , integers and , and the twisting sheaf on .
Cohomology of twists on projective space: for every commutative ring , every and every , is the free -module on the Laurent monomials with for all and , and it is nonzero precisely when and (for ); for , for every . (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)
Compositions with positive parts: for integers and the number of compositions of into exactly positive parts is , and there are none when . (Compositions of into positive parts are counted by )
The free module over a ring on an indexed set is the direct sum of copies of indexed by that set; when every such direct sum is the zero module, whatever the index set. (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules)
Proof
For apply [F1]: is the free -module on the Laurent monomials with for all and . This is the first assertion.
The all-negative exponent vectors correspond bijectively to tuples with , and these are the compositions of into exactly positive parts when . If , then . For , a sum of positive cannot equal ; for , the no-compositions clause of [F2] applies with and . Thus in either case the module is zero. If , then and [F2] with and counts the tuples as , so the free module has that rank when and is the zero module when by [F3].
For , [F1] gives for every ; the top group in dimension zero is , so the last assertion follows.
Boundaries and choice accounting. The endpoint is the first value with a basis monomial, namely for all and hence ; for one has , so by the second clause of [F2] there is no composition and the group is zero. The case and all positive give the zero group. The zero ring is handled by [F3]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F1] and nothing further is selected.
Depends on
- Compositions of $n$ into $k$ positive parts are counted by $\binom{n-1}{k-1}$
- The Axiom of Choice
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- Commutative ring
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Twisting sheaf on Proj
- Cohomology of O(d) on projective space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.8.2 (Tag 01XV) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Section 19.2 (standard reference, not scraped)