How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a commutative nonnegatively graded ring that is generated as an -algebra by its degree one part , and let with twisting sheaves (Twisting sheaf on Proj). By Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings each is invertible (Invertible sheaves), and the multiplication maps are isomorphisms.
Fixed embedding. The scheme is considered together with this fixed choice of degree-one generated presentation. Let be an -module. For every integer the -th twist of is the tensor product of sheaves of modules (Tensor product of sheaves of modules) Thus is again an -module, and for one has , with the canonical morphism induced by the multiplication maps of Twisting sheaf on Proj; this morphism is an isomorphism because . For all integers the isomorphisms above induce canonical isomorphisms
Quasi-coherence. If is quasi-coherent then so is every twist : the invertible sheaf is quasi-coherent, and the tensor product of two quasi-coherent modules is quasi-coherent by Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence.
General ample line bundles. If instead is an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) — for instance an ample one (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) — then for one writes ( factors, ) and for one writes , where is the inverse invertible sheaf of Invertible sheaves; the corresponding twist of is . For these powers only the pair is used, with no presentation of implicit.
No silent change of embedding. The notation is reserved for the twisting determined by the fixed invertible sheaf of the chosen presentation (or, for a projectively embedded scheme, by the pullback of along the fixed embedding). When the embedding or the line bundle changes, the twist is written explicitly as , so that never silently switches the embedding.
Depends on
Used by
- h0 differs from the Euler characteristic before vanishing Counterexample
- Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme Definition
- Generator cocycle for H1 of O(-2) Example
- High-degree section module is finite graded Lemma
- Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex Lemma
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction Lemma
- Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial Theorem
- Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial Theorem
- Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)